• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Duck Die-Off in Idaho

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Duck Die-Off in Idaho

cartski said:
Would not bacteria and fungi tests need time to grow? more than, what, 24 hours now? Please excuse my ignorance of such tests.

J.
The ducks began dying a week ago. 500 died last weekend. They should have started testing Monday. Bacteria or fungi should be visible under a microscope. I believe fatal aspirgillus would produce visible mold on internal organs.

There are SIX agencies involved, including Homeland Security.

A spike in duck deaths due to mold or bacteria would not generate this interest level.
 
Re: Duck Die-Off in Idaho

Thanks.

Politics has to catch up with science, again. So much for real-time communication.
 
Death of 1,000 mallards in Idaho raises health concerns

Death of 1,000 mallards in Idaho raises health concerns

Thursday, Dec 14, 2006
Death of 1,000 mallards in Idaho raises health concerns


The death of more than 1,000 mallard ducks along a southern Idaho creek bed has puzzled wildlife agencies in the United States.
Investigators from the Idaho Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security are testing tissue samples, hoping to rule out an avian flu outbreak.
Migratory mallards from Canada and their local cousins began dying last week around Land Springs Creek, about 300 kilometres southeast of Boise.


While other birds such as geese, crows and eagles in the area have been unaffected, reports said the ducks were still perishing Wednesday, staggering and struggling to breathe before collapsing.
In October, 243 mallard ducks died in a similar manner in Chilliwack, B.C.
Investigators at the British Columbia Ministry of Agriculture's animal health centre found those ducks died of pulmonary aspergillosis, a condition caused when fungal spores are inhaled. The ducks may have contracted the fungal infection while feeding in a cornfield.

The mass deaths of ducks in B.C. were not seen as a risk to the general population, a spokesperson for the Fraser Health Authority said at the time.
Health experts take bird deaths seriously for fear they might be connected to the Avian flu virus, a deadly virus with at least one strain capable of passing on to humans.
With files from the Associated Press

http://www.mytelus.com/news/article.do?pageID=cbc/world_home&articleID=2485330
 
Re: Duck Die-Off in Idaho

If test results for the ducks take this long with 5 gov't agencies involved, one wonders how timely we will find out when a pandemic breaks out in humans.
 
Re: Duck Die-Off in Idaho

4-ABBA said:
If test results for the ducks take this long with 5 gov't agencies involved, one wonders how timely we will find out when a pandemic breaks out in humans.

I think it is the announcement of test results that is taking so long. For humans it will just be "best of luck" (H5N1 doesn't read press releases)
 
Re: Duck Die-Off in Idaho

http://www.localnews8.com/news/local/4929016.html

UPDATE: Fish & Game Determine Cause of Duck Deaths
Fish and Game officials in Boise have received confirmation it was a fungus that killed over 3,000 mallard ducks near a creek in Cassia County.

The fungus was Aspergillosis, which is commonly found growing on decaying vegetation. In this case officials think the mallards ate some moldy waste grain and then congregated to the warm spring water creek to rest and digest-then died.

The fungus is not contagious, and cannot be spread to humans or other animals. Fish and Game says this should not effect duck hunting season. Officials are currently looking for the source of the infection
Story Created: Dec 15, 2006 at 1:46 PM MST

Story Updated: Dec 15, 2006 at 1:47 PM MST
 
Re: Duck Die-Off in Idaho

What was the data conveyed in that "confirmation" that Fish and Game "officials" received?

Lab tests with data?

Or just an "opinion"?

Do the "officials" at Fish and Game that received that "confirmation" have names?

From whom (i.e., what agency) did that "confirmation" come from?

Was any person directly quoted in the originating source of that "confirmation"?

WHY SO VAGUE WITH SUCH A MOMENTOUS ISSUE?
 
Re: Duck Die-Off in Idaho

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Homeland Security, Department of Environmental Quality, Department of Agriculture and South Central Health District joined Fish and Game in trying to determine the cause of death.
With the Incident Command System, there is a chain of command and there are jurisdictions of responsibility. There's the need to determine the cause and to protect citizens locally and more widely if needed.

There's always a designated "lead agency" that, when it needs to, partners up with others, based on pre-arrangement (the MOUs). Idaho Dept of Fish and Game has or had the lead on this one as the dieoff originated in their SRA (a park), I'm sure. It's likely they defer up to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for their primary fed interaction if and when it's needed since migratory birds ignore state jurisdictional boundaries.

I am pretty sure the Dept of Agriculture is not part of the testing program, per se. My guess is that it's the same with Dept of Homeland Security. It's my understanding that DOA will not be involved directly until the agency in charge of sending off the samples and getting the results actually gets some results back. Sounds like primary responsibility rests with or originally rested with the State of Idaho.

Sometimes incidents call for "joint command" between state and fed. I don't know if this one does. Without agreements on who's in charge, who's consulted, who is kept apprised, and how those relationships change as the incident evolves, there would be chaos.

KC correct me if I'm wrong.
 
Iran vs Idaho

Iran vs Idaho

hawkeye said:

I think it is a toss-up between the 4000 dead exhasted birds in Iran (twice at the same migration time of the year) and the Rest In Peace tale for the 3000 dead birds in Idaho.
 
Re: Duck Die-Off in Idaho

4-ABBA said:
What was the data conveyed in that "confirmation" that Fish and Game "officials" received?

Lab tests with data?

Or just an "opinion"?

Do the "officials" at Fish and Game that received that "confirmation" have names?

From whom (i.e., what agency) did that "confirmation" come from?

Was any person directly quoted in the originating source of that "confirmation"?

WHY SO VAGUE WITH SUCH A MOMENTOUS ISSUE?

No definitive tests named.
No actual data results defined.
No spokesperson named.
No source/lead agency ID'd.

No comprende.
 
Re: Duck Die-Off in Idaho

Sheriff: County should have been in on duck death investigation

By Renee Wells/South Idaho Press
Friday, December 15, 2006 11:35 AM CST
<TABLE class=photo-bdr cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=500 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top width=500>
1ducks3.jpg
</TD></TR><TR><TD class=cutline vAlign=top width=500>A sign warns hunters not to consume waterfowl from an area near Oakley after Idaho Fish and Game officers discovered thousands of dead mallards along a single creek in the area beginning Friday, Dec. 8. Photo by Laurie Welch/South Idaho Press </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>Some Cassia County officials were a little miffed and very concerned that they weren?t notified immediately of the recent duck deaths near Oakley and the subsequent investigation.

A conference call Thursday afternoon pulled everyone together, but did little to solve the mystery of more than 2,500 dead mallards found at Land Springs Creek near Oakley over the last week.

?I couldn?t get anybody to return my phone calls,? said Sheriff Jim Higens, who is also the county?s homeland security coordinator. ?Everything I knew, I learned from the local newspaper.?

Higens said it upset him that officials issued a press release Wednesday saying homeland security was involved in the investigation but he had been left out of the loop.

?It?s the responsibility of elected officials in this county to let the citizens know what?s going on,? Higens said. ?We couldn?t give our citizens any good advice because we simply didn?t know anything.?

Higens said while he was waiting Thursday morning for a call from Idaho State Homeland Security officials, he received an email inviting him to participate in the afternoon conference call.
<TABLE class=clear-table cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top><SCRIPT src="/shared-content/adsys/creative.js" type=text/javascript></SCRIPT><SCRIPT src="http://adsys.townnews.com/global/capped.js" type=text/javascript></SCRIPT><SCRIPT type=text/javascript><!-- document.write('<scr' + 'ipt type="text/javascript" src="http://adsys.townnews.com/global/capped.js"></scr' + 'ipt>');aCampaigns = new Array();aCampaigns[28] = 100;aAds = new Array();nAdsysTime = new Date().getTime()/1000;if ((nAdsysTime >= 1143871200) && (nAdsysTime <= 1175403599)) {aAd = new Array('news+middle', '44287', 'gif');aAd[3] = 'http://www.cassiaregional.com';aAd[4] = '1';aAd[7] = 10;aAd[8] = 0;aAd[9] = 28;aAd[10] = 0;aAd[11] = 0;aAds[aAds.length] = aAd;}adsys_displayAd('http://adsys.townnews.com', 'southidahopress.com', aAds, aCampaigns);// --></SCRIPT><SCRIPT src="http://adsys.townnews.com/global/capped.js" type=text/javascript></SCRIPT>http://adsys.townnews.com/c35398308...dle/44287.gif?r=http://www.cassiaregional.com </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>Cassia County Commissioner Paul Christensen also expressed concern that the county had not been apprised of what was going on. But he said he was certain if there had been an immediate health or safety threat to local citizens, commissioners would have been contacted.

?I?m concerned, but I have confidence in the agencies that are doing the investigation,? Christensen said.

Regional officials at Idaho Fish and Game said when they got the call, they contacted state communications.

?They are the coordinating agency,? said Regional Supervisor Dave Parish. ?I can?t tell you who they contacted or why, but they are the ones who have been coordinating the investigation.?

Department of Environmental Quality Air Quality and Remediation Regional Manager Bill Allred said he did not think there was any conspiracy or planned effort to leave anyone out of the loop intentionally.

?I think we just each took care of what we felt was our own issue and didn?t think about who was or was not included,? Allred said.
<TABLE class=photo-bdr cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top></TD></TR><TR><TD class=cutline vAlign=top></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>Thursday?s conference call gave no clues to the cause of the duck deaths, Higens said.

?A lot of what they talked about was really over my head, but to make a long story short, they told us they still don?t have any decisive answers to the cause,? Higens said.

Initial tests did indicate the ducks did not die from avian flu, Higens said.

?They are going to have another conference call on Monday,? he said, ?hopefully with some results to the testing that is being done.?

Higens said he received an apology from the state homeland security office and assurance that the office would look into why county officials were not notified of the incident.

Higens said state agriculture officials and Fish and Game officers are leading the investigation

http://www.southidahopress.com/articles/2006/12/15/news/local/1ducks3.txt
 
Re: Duck Die-Off in Idaho

<TABLE cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=3 width=448 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=mainTitles vAlign=top>Concentration of natural fungus may have killed mallards</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=1 width=400 align=center border=0><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top>By Gary Stivers</TD></TR><TR><TD>Friday, December 15, 2006</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=1 width=448 bgColor=#ffffff border=0><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top align=middle><TABLE cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=3 width=395 bgColor=#ffffff border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=text11 vAlign=top>
121406.IS.biologists-771C.jpg


The sudden death of 2,500 wild mallard ducks near Oakley, ID may have resulted from their exposure to aspergillus fungus, a pathogen found growing on dead leaves, stored grain, compost piles, or in other decaying vegetation, Reuters News has reported.

The fungus can attack humans with impaired health, but the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality has found no humans affected in the region around Oakley. The National Library of Medicine, a division of the National Institutes of Health, notes that "although most people are frequently exposed to aspergillus, infections caused by it such as a pneumonia or fungus ball (aspergilloma) are rare," adding only that "people with predisposing factors (asthma, cystic fibrosis, etc.) should try to avoid environments where this fungus is found if possible."
The behavior of the fungus matches the damage done the ducks ?hemorrhaging in heart muscle, bacterial lesions in their lungs. Such a large dieoff of wild ducks suggests they encountered a large concentration of the aspergillus fungus somewhere near Oakley. Investigations by DEQ and IDFG have yet to find any such concentration.

IDFG Jerome region manager Dave Parrish Thursday told the Associated Press every mallard in a radius of several miles of Oakley has died ? 2,500 and perhaps a few more- but no other bird species have been affected and no other biotic communities in the water or in the riparian environment alongside Land Springs Creek were disturbed. Numerous golden eagles, geese, magpies, crows populate the same area and none were found with any health problems Thursday.

http://www.sunvalleyonline.com/news/article.asp?ID_Article=2808
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
Re: Duck Die-Off in Idaho

Fungal Infection May Have Killed Ducks

By JESSE HARLAN ALDERMAN Friday, December 15, 2006

<!--<div border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="[component:image-photo-width]">--><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 align=right border=0><TBODY><TR><TD>
d8m1i5to1.jpg

In this December 2006 photo provided by the Idaho Dept. of Fish and Game, Idaho Dept. of Fish and Game biologists look at a cluster of dead ducks discovered in Land Springs Creek, near Oakley, Idaho. State wildlife agencies and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security on Wednesday, Dec. 13, 2006, were testing the tissue samples from more than 1,000 mallard ducks that are dying in a bizarre cluster along a southeastern Idaho creek bed, hoping to rule out an avian flu outbreak.

</TD></TR><TR><TD><SCRIPT src="/shared-content/adsys/creative.js" type=text/javascript></SCRIPT><SCRIPT src="http://adsys.townnews.com/global/capped.js" type=text/javascript></SCRIPT><SCRIPT type=text/javascript><!-- document.write('<scr' + 'ipt type="text/javascript" src="http://adsys.townnews.com/global/capped.js"></scr' + 'ipt>');aCampaigns = new Array();aCampaigns[542] = 100;aAds = new Array();nAdsysTime = new Date().getTime()/1000;if ((nAdsysTime >= 1144040400) && (nAdsysTime <= 1459745999)) {aAd = new Array('ap+rtcontophorsize.2', '44537', 'swf');aAd[3] = '336';aAd[4] = '280';aAd[5] = new Array();aAd[5][0] = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.wyocoldwellbanker.com';aAd[6] = 'ap%2Brtcontophorsize.2';aAd[7] = 10;aAd[8] = 0;aAd[9] = 542;aAd[10] = 0;aAd[11] = 0;aAds[aAds.length] = aAd;}if ((nAdsysTime >= 1153458000) && (nAdsysTime <= 1170395999)) {aAd = new Array('ap+rtcontophorsize.2', '53153', 'swf');aAd[3] = '336';aAd[4] = '280';aAd[5] = new Array();aAd[5][0] = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.prestigehomebrokers.com';aAd[6] = 'ap%2Brtcontophorsize.2';aAd[7] = 10;aAd[8] = 0;aAd[9] = 542;aAd[10] = 0;aAd[11] = 0;aAds[aAds.length] = aAd;}if ((nAdsysTime >= 1159678800) && (nAdsysTime <= 1191214799)) {aAd = new Array('ap+rtcontophorsize.2', '58182', 'swf');aAd[3] = '336';aAd[4] = '280';aAd[5] = new Array();aAd[5][0] = 'http%3A%2F%2Fwww.amcentralmortgage.com%2Fdefault.aspx';aAd[6] = 'ap%2Brtcontophorsize.2';aAd[7] = 10;aAd[8] = 0;aAd[9] = 542;aAd[10] = 0;aAd[11] = 0;aAds[aAds.length] = aAd;}adsys_displayAd('http://adsys.townnews.com', 'casperstartribune.net', aAds, aCampaigns);// --></SCRIPT><SCRIPT src="http://adsys.townnews.com/global/capped.js" type=text/javascript></SCRIPT></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>BOISE, Idaho - A fungal infection likely killed 2,500 mallard ducks in a mysterious cluster along a tiny southeastern Idaho creek, a federal wildlife biologist said Friday.

The chances are "extremely high" that Aspergillosis, which can create a fungal toxin on moldy grains and rotting corn, caused the mass die-off, Paul Slota, a biologist with the U.S. Geological Survey's National Wildlife Health Center in Madison, Wis., told The Associated Press.

Aspergillosis will not spread from bird to bird. All the dead mallards probably ate from the same tainted food source, Slota said.

"We've seen that before with birds that feed heavily on grains," he said. "Never in Idaho, but there have been enough reports elsewhere in North America. Aspergillosis die-offs are not a terribly uncommon thing. It happens."
</SPAN>The Wildlife Health Center has already screened nine intestinal tissue swabs from the dead ducks. Each sample showed fungal plaque in the lungs typical of Aspergillosis and tested negative for avian influenza, Slota said.

Scientists at the Wisconsin laboratory were still testing additional tissue swabs and eight mallard carcasses shipped from Idaho. They were waiting to cross-check their results with tests performed at the U.S. Department of Agriculture's National Animal Disease Center in Ames, Iowa, before making an official diagnosis.

The testing was expected to definitively rule out all strains of avian influenza virus, including the much-feared H5N1 Asian bird flu, Slota said.

Officials from the Idaho Department of Fish and Game, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and several other agencies also were awaiting test results on water samples and grain from nearby farm depots that may have become moldy and poisoned the birds.

Farmland surrounds the backwoods creek near the remote town of Oakley, about 180 miles southeast of Boise. A cattle feedlot is close by.

There are no factories in the area that discharge toxins into local streams and rivers. Wastewater does not run into the spring-fed creek, said David Parrish, the regional supervisor for the Idaho Department of Fish and Game.

The ducks began dying last week. On Thursday, state workers cleared the last remaining carcasses and brought them to a nearby incineration site.

Local mallards and migratory ducks from Canada staggered and struggled to breathe before collapsing, Parrish said. The symptoms _ bacterial lesions in the lungs and hemorrhaging in the heart wall _ are consistent with Aspergillosis, Slota said.

Parrish said every mallard in a radius of several miles died.

The massive outbreak had puzzled scientists because scavenger birds feeding on the dead ducks were not showing signs of illness. Golden eagles, geese, magpies, crows and other birds in the area all remained healthy.

Among the 2,500 mallards, wildlife officials found one pintail duck, said Kelton Hatch, a spokesman for Idaho Fish and Game.

Slota said biologists also tested an American Wigeon that died near the creek, which also showed symptoms of Aspergillosis.

Last year, about 500 mostly mallard ducks died in similar circumstances at a pond in Waterloo, Iowa. The Iowa Department of Natural Resources said the ducks likely died from Aspergillosis.

Iowa wildlife officials said the ducks likely all ate from the same store of discarded grain that festered in melted snow.

A service of the Associated Press(AP)

http://www.casperstartribune.net/articles/2006/12/15/ap/science/d8m1i5to1.txt
 
Re: Duck Die-Off in Idaho

Aspergillosis in Birds
Veterinary & Aquatic Services Department, Drs. Foster & Smith, Inc.

http://www.peteducation.com/article.cfm?cls=15&cat=1829&articleid=2384

What is aspergillosis and what causes it?
Aspergillosis is a respiratory disease of birds caused by the fungus Aspergillus, which is found almost everywhere in the environment.

A. fumigatus is the most common species of the fungus to cause disease, although A. flavus, A. niger, and others can also cause problems. Aspergillus grows readily in warm and moist environments. The microscopic spores of the fungus become airborne, and poor ventilation, poor sanitation, dusty conditions, and close confinement increase the chance the spores will be inhaled.

Usually, the fungus does not cause disease, however, if a bird does not have a healthy immune system, it can cause illness. Predisposing factors include other illnesses, stress, poor nutrition, poor husbandry or unsanitary conditions, another injury to the respiratory system (e.g.; smoke inhalation), and prolonged use of certain medications such as antibiotics or corticosteroids.

The combination of the number of spores in the environment and the presence of predisposing factors determine which birds are most at risk of disease. Aspergillosis appears to be more common in parrots and mynahs than other pet birds.

What are the signs of aspergillosis?

Aspergillosis can follow one of two courses - acute or chronic. Birds with acute aspergillosis have severe difficulty breathing, decreased or loss of appetite, frequent drinking and urination, cyanosis (a bluish coloration of mucous membranes and/or skin), and even sudden death. The fungus generally affects the trachea, syrinx (voice box), and air sacs. The lungs may also be involved. Diagnosis is generally made through a post-mortem examination.

Chronic aspergillosis is much more common, and unfortunately, much more deadly due to its insidious nature. The bird may not become symptomatic until the disease has progressed too far for a cure. The respiratory system is the primary location of infection. White nodules appear and ultimately erode through the tissue, and large numbers of spores enter the bloodstream. The spores then travel throughout the body, infecting multiple organs including kidneys, skin, muscle, gastrointestinal tract, liver, eyes, and brain.

Respiratory symptoms will be the first to occur but will depend on the location of the greatest areas of colonization. Difficulty breathing, rapid breathing and/or exercise intolerance are common. If the syrinx (voice box) is involved, a change in voice, reluctance to talk, or a "click" may occur. Nares may become plugged or you may see a discharge. Eventually, severe respiratory compromise may kill the bird.

Other signs and symptoms will vary, depending on the other organs involved. If any portion of the central nervous system has become involved, the bird may have tremors, an uneven or wobbly gait, seizures, or paralysis. With liver involvement, a green discoloration to the urates may be seen, and the veterinarian may feel an enlarged liver. Generalized, non-specific symptoms can include loss of appetite leading to weight loss, muscle wasting, gout (painful, inflamed joints due to urate deposits), regurgitation, abnormal feces or diarrhea, excessive urination, depression, and lethargy.

Spores can penetrate fresh or incubating eggs and will kill the embryos.

How is aspergillosis diagnosed?

Aspergillosis can be very difficult to diagnose since the signs of disease mimic those of many other illnesses, especially in the chronic form. The veterinarian will need a detailed history of the course of the illness, and an accurate description of the diet and husbandry of the bird. Radiographs, a complete blood count, and a chemistry panel may help support a diagnosis. Endoscopy can be used to view lesions in the syrinx or trachea, and a sample can be taken for culture and microscopic examination, either of which can confirm a diagnosis. A diagnosis can also be made based on a specific blood test used to detect antibodies to Aspergillus in the blood. Sometimes, however, the test can be falsely negative, especially if the bird's immune system is suppressed.

How is aspergillosis treated?

Surgery may be performed to remove accessible lesions. Antifungal drugs, such as itraconazole, ketoconazole, terbinafine, flucytosine, and amphotericin B, may be administered orally, topically, by injection, or nebulizing, depending upon the drug. Therapy needs to be continued for weeks to months and more than one antifungal drug may be used. Supportive care such as oxygen, supplemental heat, tube feeding, and treatment of underlying conditions are often needed. Unfortunately, the prognosis is always guarded.

How can aspergillosis be prevented?

The importance of good husbandry to prevent outbreaks of aspergillosis cannot be overstated. Keep your bird in a well-ventilated environment. Clean food and water dishes every day. Replace substrate (material lining the cage bottom) regularly. Remove your bird and thoroughly clean cages, toys, perches, etc., at least once a month. Pay attention to good nutrition, offering the right combination of fruits, vegetables, grains and seeds with variety, and only a sprinkling of "treats." Essentially, you want to do everything you can to alleviate stress in your bird's life and provide a scrupulously clean environment.

A susceptible bird that has been exposed to Aspergillus may be treated with flucytosine and itraconazole in an attempt to prevent infection.


References and Further Reading


Rupley, AE. Manual of Avian Practice. W.B. Saunders Co. Philadelphia, PA; 1997.

Oglesbee, BL. Mycotic Diseases. Altman, RB; Clubb, SL; Dorrestein, GM; Quesenberry, K. (eds.). Avian Medicine and Surgery. W.B. Saunders Co. Philadelphia, PA; 1997.

Olsen, GH; Orosz, SE. Manual of Avian Medicine. Mosby, Inc. St. Louis, MO; 2000.
 
Last edited:
Re: Duck Die-Off in Idaho

IMPORTANT: See highlighted text below. Authoritative website covers what species of birds get aspergillus; and how it can be diagnosed in deceased birds via visual tissue examination immediately, and via examining tissue stains in 24 hours.

Epidemics with sudden die-offs only occur in very young birds.

It is important to note that hemmorhage of heart tissue is not listed anywhere as symptomatic evidence.

====================

http://www.aspergillus.org.uk/secure/veterinary/chap1avian.htm

AVIAN ASPERGILLOSIS

Disease Name Aspergillosis. Syn. Pneumonomycosis, Bronchomycosis, Cytomycosis, Brooder pneumonia, and in part Pseudotuberculosis and Mycosis; in ostriches Chick fever and Yellow liver. Pneumonie du couveuse (Fr.).

Pathogens. Aspergillus fumigatus Fresenius, 1850-53. Syn. A. nigrescens Robin, 1853; A. aviarius Peck, 1891. Aspergillus flavus Link, 1809. (Schieblich, 1921). Aspergillus niger van Tieghem, 1867. (Hare, 1937). Aspergillus nidulans (Eidam) Wint.,1884. (Ainsworth & Rewell, 1949 ). Aspergillus terreus Thom, 1916. (Ainsworth & Austwick, 1955a).

Hosts. Domesticated and caged birds; fowl, turkey, duck, goose, pigeon, canary, budgerigar, parrot, ostrich. Captive wild birds, especially water birds; duck, geese, penguin, stork, flamingo, cormorant, parrot, hawk, owl, pheasant, peafowl. Free-living wild birds; wood-pigeon, seagull, rook, pheasant, sparrow, swan, jay, grouse, Manx shearwater, thrush.

Geographical Distribution. World-wide. Severe economic losses occur, chiefly in areas of intensive rearing.

The striking post-mortem picture presented by avian aspergillosis was no doubt responsible for its early recognition so that by the end of the nineteenth century some 60 contributions had been made on the disease of birds alone. At first there was little attempt to identify the "green mould" seen in the air-sac and bronchial lesions (Owen, 1832) and many of the early accounts are difficult to interpret for this reason. There was also much confusion between the pathogenic and saprophytic species of Aspergillus. Progress in the study of the disease was also slowed by controversy over the aetiological significance of the fungi found sporulating on the lesions and although the primary pathogenicity of most of these is now well established, the epidemiology and development of the disease still require further investigation.



There are extensive reviews of avian aspergillosis by Lesbouyries (1941), Urbain & Guillot (1938) and Verge (1927), in which may be found detailed accounts of the species of birds affected, and of the pathology, diagnosis, mycology and therapy of the disease.

Symptomatology

Because almost any organ of the avian body may be affected by aspergillosis, the symptoms are extremely varied. They may be respiratory, digestive or nervous and occur in birds of all ages.

Acute aspergillosis -This typically occurs in very young birds and may be associated with considerable losses. Watkins (1940), for instance, estimated that 10% of all deaths in chicks under 14 days old were caused by this disease. Typically there is loss of appetite, increased respiration, a rise in temperature, listlessness, foetid diarrhoea and rapid loss of condition. Convulsions sometimes occur and affected birds often die within 24-48 hours of the onset of symptoms. Epidemic outbreaks in young birds frequently have a very high death rate before control measures can be taken. Similar symptoms may occur in pullorum disease (Salmonella pullorum), from which this form of aspergillosis must be distinguished.

Chronic aspergillosis -The onset of this form is insidious and the affected birds may survive for long periods in a gradually declining state. The symptoms of the acute disease are often present in a milder form together with anaemia, yellowing of the faeces and the presence of a respiratory rattle. The chronic disease generally occurs sporadically and is the usual form in adult birds.

Pathology

Although the appearance of the lesions is almost diagnostic, it is necessary to eliminate tuberculosis and other granulomatous diseases. Differential diagnosis can be conclusive if the fungus is fruiting within the respiratory cavities of the bird but as this only occurs in the chronic stages of the disease, the demonstration of hyphae in the nodules is the most useful method. This is carried out by crushing the whole or a piece of a nodule under a coverslip on a slide in a drop of 20% potassium hydroxide or in lactophenol cotton blue. The hyphae can usually be seen projecting from the edges of the masses of caseous material and if the latter technique is used they will stain deeply.

Lungs - In the lungs the acute form typically appears as yellowish- white miliary nodules 1-3 mm. in diameter which are generally evenly distributed throughout the tissue. Each nodule is surrounded by a dark infiltrated zone, the remainder of the lung appearing normal. Chronic lesions either result from the coalescence of many nodules or are formed by the enlargement of single ones and may eventually become calcified. A peracute pneumonic form also occurs in which there is complete congestion of lung tissue without the formation of nodules.

Air-sacs -The serous membrane of the air-sacs becomes thickened in places by the development of small yellowish-white plaque-like lesions which enlarge rapidly, become raised in the centre, and then coalesce to form a complete membranous or caseous lining to the serosa up to 5 mm. thick.

Bronch and Trachea -These organs may become blocked either by lesions similar to those described in the air-sacs, or, in the pneumonic form, by mucoid discharge.

Wherever the surface of a lesion is exposed to the air, the conidiophores of A. fumigatus can develop, forming the characteristic greenish-blue or dark grey patches of sporing heads so often described by early observers.

Lesions in sites other than the respiratory organs are generally chronic:-

Alimentary canal - Plaque-like lesions may occur in the mouth, the gizzard and the intestines especially in turkeys (Lignires & Petit, 1898).

Liver, spleen, kidneys and ovaries - Nodular lesions have been found in all these organs sometimes associated with those in adjacent abdominal air-sacs (Emmel, 1929). Peritonitis is not uncommon and the disease in ostrich chicks has been termed "yellow liver" (Walker, 1915).

Nervous system -The occurrence of nervous symptoms in aspergillosis including convulsions and torticollis has been partly attributed by Henrici (1939) to the production of toxins by the growth of A. fumigatus in the body. There are however several reports of abscesses in the cerebrum and cerebellum containing the hyphae of A. fumigatus both in the presence (Raines et al.,1956) and absence (Jungherr & Gifford, 1944) of pulmonary and other lesions.

Eyes - Lesions have been noted in the eyes of baby chicks by Hudson (1947) and in turkeys by Moore (1953), the latter author finding the condition significantly more common in males than in females.

Bones and joints - Osteo-arthritis may be set up in the joints with subsequent lameness (Bizard & Pommay, 1887) and lesions in the long bones were observed very early by Heusinger (1821).

Skin -There is some doubt as to the reliability of the reports of skin infection (Lahaye, 1928), mostly because of the inability of the aspergilli to utilize keratin. Moulds can always be isolated from the skin of birds, where they are probably present as spores, and any sustained moist condition of the skin will lead to their germination.

Following castration - Babic (1930) reported infection with Aspergillus fumigatus at the site of surgical caponization, with spread to the liver and the air-sacs, and a similar incident was reported by Chute et al. (1955).

In the nodular lesions, there is a central necrotic zone containing a radiating mass of branching hyphae (2-3 micra diam.). These hyphae are generally clearly septate but may be either irregular in outline and appear to consist of swollen segments, or of normal elongated appearance and very sparsely septate. Numerous epithelioid and giant cells surround this centre and outside is a reaction zone of eosinophiles, lymphocytes and fibrous tissue (Lesbouyries, 1941). Völker (1924) claimed that the presence of eosinophiles was in itself sufficient to distinguish the infection from tuberculosis, which however may also be present in the same bird (Ainsworth & Rewell, 1949).

The development of the lesions has been followed in detail only by Nicolaus (1934). He found that lesions produced experimentally in the air-sacs of fowls were visible within eight hours of inoculation by the intratracheal route. At twelve hours they consisted of subepithelial nodules formed from pseudo-eosinophiles accumulating around the invading fungus hyphae. At three days he observed the temporary development of conidiophores within the central necrotic zone, the formation of daughter nodules and the appearance of histiocytes, epithelioid cells and giant cells. In the later stages a many-Iayered fibrous capsule was formed round the necrotic centre and the lesions reached a diameter of 25 mm. in twenty-two days.

Mycology

Diagnosis by direct examination of the lesions is not always successful and the isolation of the pathogen must always be undertaken to identify the species. The best method is to plate out small pieces of the lesions or affected tissues on to malt agar or Sabouraud glucose agar, containing antibacterial antibiotics. Mycelial growth is usually visible within twenty-four hours at 37°C. and the characteristic conidiophores are often produced within two days.

Aspergillus fumigatus is the commonest cause of avian aspergillosis. It was first described by Fresenius in 1850-53 from the lungs of a great bustard in the Frankfurt zoo but many of the earlier records of avian aspergillosis would appear to have been associated with this species although the descriptions are inadequate for certain identification. Other species of Aspergillus have also been incriminated (see list of pathogens) of which A. flavus and A. nidulans are probably the most frequent (Schieblich 1921; Ainsworth & Rewell, 1949). Yet further species reported from birds include A. glaucus (Spring, 1848), A.candidus (Rayel & Montagne, 1842) and A.dubius (Heusinger, 1821) but these are either well known saprophytes which were undoubtedly contaminants (e.g. A.glaucus series) or were doubtful identifications of pathogenic species.

The identification of the different species of Aspergillus has been greatly facilitated by the manual of Thorn & Raper (1945) and this can be referred to for keys and descriptions. The genus Aspergillus is characterized by the formation of a vesicle on the end of the upright conidiophore, followed by the appearance of peg-Iike structures over its surface. These are the sterigmata and they form chains of conidia from their distal ends, giving the columns of spores seen in culture. The different species are primarily distinguished on the structure of the sporing "heads" and on the colour of the spore mass. A few Aspergillus spp. form the "perfect" state in culture and are classed as Ascomycetes. In these, e.g. A. nidulans, the asci are formed inside closed fruiting bodies caIled cleistothecia and each contains up to eight ascospores. This type of spore probably plays little part in the epidemiology of aspergillosis although ascospores are generally more resistant: to adverse conditions than conidia.

There is some evidence that moulds other than Aspergillus spp. can cause similar lesions, but a great many of such reports appear to be due to the high rate of contamination of bird lungs by the spores of saprophytic fungi (Baker et al., 1934). Proof of infection by these fungi must depend on the isolation of a species with the same hyphal morphology as that seen in the lesions. Further work should show whether different species of Aspergillus cause distinct forms of the disease as for example in the association of caseating pneumonia with A. niger reported by Hare (1937).

Strain variation and Susceptibility.

Although Henrici (1939) states that "many strains of A.fumigatus isolated from air or vegetation show no pathogenicity" there seems little confirmation of this and a remarkable constancy in morphology and pathogenicity is a characteristic of this species. Occasional isolates are white, floccose and produce few spores, but these have not been reported from birds.

On the other hand considerable variation occurs in the susceptibility of different varieties of domestic birds to aspergillosis. Generali (1879) first showed that the finer bred races of pigeon succumbed to the disease more readily than others, and Asthana (1944) considered that the races of Rhode Island Red hens he studied were affected more seriously than Black Minorcas or White Leghorns. Brooksbank & Austwick (1955) showed how heavy losses in a hatchery occurred only in the weeks when eggs from inbreeding pens were hatching, whilst the alternating crossbred hatches escaped infection although in the same incubator. This outbreak also suggested that certain strains of Rhode Island Reds and White Leghorns were apparently more susceptible than others.

Epidemiology

There is no doubt that infection follows the inhalation of fungus spores from mouldy litter, grain, meal or other sources. The quantitative aspects of natural infection are quite unknown but the main habitat of A.fumigatus and other pathogenic species is in rotting plant and animal material especially damp hay, straw and grain which have heated up during storage. In this way A.fumigatus may become the predominant mould.

Although the source of infection for domestic fowls may often be traceable it is not so with aspergillosis in free-living and captive wild birds. Davis & McClung (1940) said that A.fumigatus developing in rotting seaweed was responsible for widespread deaths in herring gulls at Boston, U.S.A., whilst mouldy combine straw has been considered to have led to the deaths of pheasants. In captive water birds the litter and food are generally regarded as the inoculum source, but Ainsworth & Rewell (1949) found advanced cases in birds which had been captured only two days previously so that infection must have been present in the wild.

In connexion with the occurrence of aspergillosis in wild geese, Sladen & Austwick (1955) undertook a study of the fungus flora of the upper respiratory tracts of wild pink footed geese in lceland and Scotland. They were unable to detect the presence of A. fumigatus in throat swabs from these birds but found over a dozen other species of fungi which were thought to have been present as spores. The source of infection for free-living wild birds is still obscure.

Treatment and Control

The treatment of avian aspergillosis is influenced by the lack of clinical diagnosis, for the symptoms are not specific and generally the peak of mortality has been passed before any therapeutic measures can be instituted. Because of this reports of successful treatment or even spontaneous recovery are doubtful.

Various methods have been used in the direct treatment of individual birds. They include the inhalation of tar vapours (Otte, 1928), chlorine or sulphur dust, but so far no information is available concerning the use of iodide therapy which has been successfully employed in the experimental disease in rabbits and also in human cases.

By far the most effective method of control is by removing the source of infection, i.e. the mouldy litter or food; this should be burned and the premises adequately cleaned out, perhaps using a fungicidal solution. Another method of prevention is described by Urbain & Guillot (1938), who regularly fed the penguins in the Paris zoo with 5-6 mg. of potassium iodide daily for eight consecutive days in each month. Each dose being inserted into a fish. By this technique they found that the incidence of aspergillosis in these birds was greatly reduced. Good sanitation and careful control of feeding stuffs and litter remain the best methods of prevention in domestic birds.

Egg Infection

Aspergillus fumigatus can readily attack both fresh and incubating eggs once it has gained entry through the shell. Infection does not seem to occur in the oviduct but results from the external contamination of the shell after laying. Penetration occurs through the pores of the shell and the fungus grows well on the shell membranes, killing the embryo if present and occasionally penetrating into the white. Eventually conidiophores and spores are formed in the air-space and affected eggs can be detected by candling. On breaking open the air-space the greenish felt of hyphae and spores is seen.

The chief fungus reported from eggs in incubation is A.fumigatus but several others have been obtained from stored eggs. Of these probably Cladosporium herbarum is the most important in causing the "black spot" discoloration reported by Weston & Halnan (1927). Lucet (1897) demonstrated that clean eggs cannot be infected by direct application of the spores of A.fumigatus and that it was necessary to put a thin layer of butter or other grease on the shell before infection would take place. Hence he concluded that dirty eggs were more liable to infection than clean, and cited an outbreak of egg infection in ducks in which the nests were heavily contaminated with A.fumigatus.


Back
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top