Re: A/Shanghai/60T/2009(H1N1) released 6/22
The above travel logs show that the three earlier Shanghai sequences are from the same sub-clade. For PB1 the defining polymorphism is also in 71T, suggesting the E627K in PB2 has a Shanghai origin.
It is also worth noting that the defining PB1 polymorphism is also in human H3N2 (and PB1 traces back to human H3N2 PB1), while the defining polymorphism in PB2 is shared with avian isolates and PB2 originated in avian.
This association linked to newly acquired polymorphisms is NOT a coincidence, and these acquisitions are NOT due to random de novo mutations created by a "sloppy" polymerase, as described in dogma cited by WHO and its band of consultants.
The above travel logs show that the three earlier Shanghai sequences are from the same sub-clade. For PB1 the defining polymorphism is also in 71T, suggesting the E627K in PB2 has a Shanghai origin.
It is also worth noting that the defining PB1 polymorphism is also in human H3N2 (and PB1 traces back to human H3N2 PB1), while the defining polymorphism in PB2 is shared with avian isolates and PB2 originated in avian.
This association linked to newly acquired polymorphisms is NOT a coincidence, and these acquisitions are NOT due to random de novo mutations created by a "sloppy" polymerase, as described in dogma cited by WHO and its band of consultants.
Comment