• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

WTB says migratory birds not to be blamed for spread of bird flu in the country

Commonground

Senior Moderator
[Link to original story is at the bottom of the post]
hat-tip Treyfish
WTB says migratory birds not to be blamed for spread of bird flu in the country

Wildlife Trust of Bangladesh (WTB) has said that migratory birds might be responsible for initial introduction of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) in Bangladesh, but ?not mainly responsible? for outbreak of avian influenza (AI) in the country.

Referring to a report published in the Daily Star on Monday under a headline 'Migratory Birds Responsible for Bird Flu', the WTB said the report based on a FAO-BLRI joint study is an ?obvious misrepresentation of fact.?

In a press release, the WTB said that the sensational headline and the leading line of the news report can only mislead people and be counter- productive to what FAO has been doing in Bangladesh and the world over to contain AI.

?The news report makes no mention of the fact that no HPAI has been found in the migratory birds in Bangladesh so far,? it said.

The WTB press release mentioned that HPAI has been found in only six cases out of 350,000 migratory birds tested all over the world.

The web-site of the Scientific Task Force on AI (http://www.aiweb.info) has up-to-date information on AI. It has found no direct evidence of contamination of poultry with AI by the migratory birds anywhere in the world, the release noted.
--UNB, Dhaka
http://www.bangladeshinfo.com/news/other_news_head.php?othid=46349

Published On: 2008-06-30
Migratory birds responsible for bird flu: Study
http://www.thedailystar.net/story.php?nid=43552
 
Re: WTB says migratory birds not to be blamed for spread of bird flu in the country

[Link to original story is at the bottom of the post]
hat-tip Treyfish
WTB says migratory birds not to be blamed for spread of bird flu in the country



The WTB press release mentioned that HPAI has been found in only six cases out of 350,000 migratory birds tested all over the world.

http://www.bangladeshinfo.com/news/other_news_head.php?othid=46349

Published On: 2008-06-30
Migratory birds responsible for bird flu: Study
http://www.thedailystar.net/story.php?nid=43552
The propaganda campaign continues.
 
Re: WTB says migratory birds not to be blamed for spread of bird flu in the country

Published On: 2008-06-30​
Metropolitan​

Migratory birds responsible for bird flu: Study

Staff Correspondent


Migratory birds are mainly responsible for the outbreak of avian influenza (AI) or bird flu in the country, according to a study report.

The report said that migratory birds might be responsible for initial introduction of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) in Bangladesh.

Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute (BLRI), Bangladesh Agriculture University, Chittagong Veterinary University, Department of Livestock Service and Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) jointly conducted the study from February to June this year.

The study involved phylogenetic, epidemiological and socio-economic analysis.

The research findings were presented at a seminar at BLRI in Savar. Former vice chancellor of Bangladesh Agriculture University Prof Dr MU Ahmed Chowdhury was present as the chief guest and BLRI Director General Dr Jahangir Alam presided over the seminar.

Dr Jahangir Alam said that from the epidemiological study, it might be predicted that after the introduction of HPAI in Bangladesh the virus spread to waterfowl and initially the native chicken and ducks might have been infected after coming into contact with the migratory birds.

Then the virus would have spread to commercial farms through poultry workers, poultry feed and medicine suppliers, feed and egg carriers and egg trays.

Socio-economic analysis shows that the poultry industry of Bangladesh faced a financial loss in 2008 due to the second wave of bird flu attack, which was estimated at Tk 3,858.31 crore. The affected farms lost their business and many of them were reluctant to go back to the production system.

The study recommended promulgating an ordinance to control movement of migratory birds throughout the country, except in selected locations or sanctuaries.

Early detection of HPAI virus, efficient surveillance and strict maintenance of bio-safety measures should also be ensured, it added.

At the same time, it is important to share information and undertake studies on HPAI bilaterally and regionally to minimise the risk of sustained endemic of AI in poultry in the region.

http://www.thedailystar.net/story.php?nid=43552
 
Re: WTB says migratory birds not to be blamed for spread of bird flu in the country

It might be prudent for the WTB to consider substantial evidence of frequent external reintroduction of new viral strains within specific study locations, in human seasonal influenza global circulation patterns. Not one, but several papers have independently stated this conclusion from exceptionally detailed genome and phylogeny mapping.

Wild birds travel in regularized, seasonal migration patterns, and so do humans.

Secondly, science reports have repeatedly documented polymorphic changes in viral genome sequences that can be mapped to distant locations, verifying that seasonal movement of avian influenza virus along migration paths.

In fact, if you zoom out on many of Niman's influenza outbreak event Google maps, you will recognize this virus travel vectorization pattern.

Localized spread of virus is probably enhanced by poultry distribution patterns, but the fact remains: rapid viral evolutionary change is continually being reintroduced into affected countries by migrating waterfowl (and to a lesser extent, by infected scavenger passerine, gullacious and raptor species).

Bangladesh is no exception.
 
Re: WTB says migratory birds not to be blamed for spread of bird flu in the country

Commentary

Migration of H5N1 Into Bangladesh
Recombinomics Commentary 12:57
July 7, 2008

Migratory birds are mainly responsible for the outbreak of avian influenza (AI) or bird flu in the country, according to a study report.

The report said that migratory birds might be responsible for initial introduction of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) in Bangladesh.

Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute (BLRI), Bangladesh Agriculture University, Chittagong Veterinary University, Department of Livestock Service and Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) jointly conducted the study from February to June this year.

The study involved phylogenetic, epidemiological and socio-economic analysis.

The above comments on H5N1 in Bangladesh are not a surprise. Although no H5N1 sequences from Bangladesh have been made public, media reports indicated the H5N1 in Bangladesh was similar to H5N1 in West Bengal. Sequences from West Bengal have also not been made published, but earlier outbreaks in India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iran were the Qinghai sub-clade 2.2.3.

The Qinghai strain was first reported at Qinghai Lake in the spring of 2005. Qinghai Lake is due north of Bangladesh, and migratory birds that winter in south Asia migrate to the Qinghai Lake in the spring, and summer in areas to the north in Siberia and Mongolia. The Ganges Delta in Bangladesh and West Bengal attract a variety of waterfowl, which would facilitate movement of H5N1 into both countries.

The involvement of waterfowl in the recent outbreaks provoked the standard disclaimers by conservation groups, which rely on negative data linked to minimal testing of waterfowl, or surveillance programs which target fecal samples or cloacal swabs, which have low or undetectable levels of clade 2.2.

In the recent outbreak in Bangladesh, dead crows tested positive for H5N1 as did one child. Crows also died in West Bengal in association with poultry outbreaks, but there are no reports of wild bird H5N1 in India. Testing in India is minimal, and only poultry has tested positive, even though resident and migratory wild birds have died in association with H5N1 positive poultry deaths. The reporting failures in India are common.

The migratory bird linkage to outbreaks in Bangladesh and India were expected. Release of sequence data by both countries would be useful.


.
 
Re: WTB says migratory birds not to be blamed for spread of bird flu in the country

"<i>A picture is worth a thousand words."</i>

http://www.werc.usgs.gov/sattrack/qinghai/overallmaps.html

USGS Satellite Tracking Project, Qinghai Migration Map

qinghailake.jpg
 
Re: WTB says migratory birds not to be blamed for spread of bird flu in the country

Compare to Niman's outbreak map.
http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?hl=e...d=106484775090296685271.0004421e05585ace94799

I tried a number of times to match flight patterns to outbreak patterns and didn't get good enough matches to settle the issue in my mind. On Niman's India map, outbreak patterns go north and then turn west at the base of the mountains. It's my understanding the geese come straight over; maybe some species detour?

I always think I see trade routes in outbreak patterns... railroad tracks and highways.
 
Re: WTB says migratory birds not to be blamed for spread of bird flu in the country

Compare to Niman's outbreak map.
http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?hl=e...d=106484775090296685271.0004421e05585ace94799

I tried a number of times to match flight patterns to outbreak patterns and didn't get good enough matches to settle the issue in my mind. On Niman's India map, outbreak patterns go north and then turn west at the base of the mountains. It's my understanding the geese come straight over; maybe some species detour?

I always think I see trade routes in outbreak patterns... railroad tracks and highways.
Only poultry outbreaks are reported. No one is testing wild birds in Bangladesh, Tibet, or India.
 
Re: WTB says migratory birds not to be blamed for spread of bird flu in the country

Lateral movement in Southern Asia (Pakistan-India-Bangladesh) reflects drought impact and loss of former migration destination wetlands (much of it drained and re-developed recently).
 
Re: WTB says migratory birds not to be blamed for spread of bird flu in the country

Only poultry outbreaks are reported. No one is testing wild birds in Bangladesh, Tibet, or India.
I'm not sure what testing wild birds has to do with their flight patterns. And even when they do test them, you only accept the results that agree with your stance on the issue.

It seems that if flight patterns were overlaid onto poultry breakouts, we should see that they coincide. Then I finally could settle the issue in my mind. As it is, I can see where infected wild ducks could infect tame ducks and they, in turn, infect nearby chickens. Otoh, initial outbreaks in enclosed layer facilities operating under strict biosecurity guidelines don't fit that pattern.

However, As each year goes by and AI becomes more and more prevelant and deeply ingrained in the environment, it's probably not going to matter so much one way or the other.

Lateral movement in Southern Asia (Pakistan-India-Bangladesh) reflects drought impact and loss of former migration destination wetlands (much of it drained and re-developed recently).
So some of the birds are detouring. Did you compare the flight map you posted with Niman's map?
 
Re: WTB says migratory birds not to be blamed for spread of bird flu in the country

I'm not sure what testing wild birds has to do with their flight patterns. And even when they do test them, you only accept the results that agree with your stance on the issue.

It seems that if flight patterns were overlaid onto poultry breakouts, we should see that they coincide. Then I finally could settle the issue in my mind. As it is, I can see where infected wild ducks could infect tame ducks and they, in turn, infect nearby chickens. Otoh, initial outbreaks in enclosed layer facilities operating under strict biosecurity guidelines don't fit that pattern.

However, As each year goes by and AI becomes more and more prevelant and deeply ingrained in the environment, it's probably not going to matter so much one way or the other.

So some of the birds are detouring. Did you compare the flight map you posted with Niman's map?
If you haven't settle the wild bird issue by now, you should stop trying. The case was closed in the summer of 2005 when Qinghai was confirmed in Siberia and Mongolia.
 
Re: WTB says migratory birds not to be blamed for spread of bird flu in the country

Niman's map is a poultry outbreak map - that's local dissemination. The larger scale of outbreaks maps roughly in proximity (sometimes VERY tightly correlated) to nearby bird/wildlife sanctuaries and known migratory staging waterways (identified through numerous birding society websites).

If you look at Niman's map of the outbreaks areas along the China Coast, from Far Eastern Russia all the way to the top of Indochina peninsula (you must really zoom out on his google map), you have the vector I mentioned.

You also see it in this H5N1 phylogeny geographical distribution map, although it doesn't show the N-S route between the northern Tibetan plateau and destinations in India-Bengal and Bangladesh.

http://www.pnas.org/content/104/11/4473/F2.large.jpg

At times, the spread of the virus has been so rapid, very little sequence change is apparent among geographically distant isolates (Tibetan steppes to eastern Europe, for instance) in 2006.

The grand irony is this: the seminal papers that provide stellar explanation of cause and effect for H5N1 long distance carriage of highly infectious H5N1 were written by bird ecologists.

Apparently those that decry the OBVIOUS evidence of carriage aren't reading these papers. NOT MY PROBLEM - they can tap dance out their explanations to funding agencies, when they are shown to be thoroughly CLUELESS as to cause-and-effect mechanics behind the rise and spread of H5N1.
 
Re: WTB says migratory birds not to be blamed for spread of bird flu in the country

Niman's map is a poultry outbreak map - that's local dissemination. The larger scale of outbreaks maps roughly in proximity (sometimes VERY tightly correlated) to nearby bird/wildlife sanctuaries and known migratory staging waterways (identified through numerous birding society websites).

If you look at Niman's map of the outbreaks areas along the China Coast, from Far Eastern Russia all the way to the top of Indochina peninsula (you must really zoom out on his google map), you have the vector I mentioned.

You also see it in this H5N1 phylogeny geographical distribution map, although it doesn't show the N-S route between the northern Tibetan plateau and destinations in India-Bengal and Bangladesh.

http://www.pnas.org/content/104/11/4473/F2.large.jpg

At times, the spread of the virus has been so rapid, very little sequence change is apparent among geographically distant isolates (Tibetan steppes to eastern Europe, for instance) in 2006.

The grand irony is this: the seminal papers that provide stellar explanation of cause and effect for H5N1 long distance carriage of highly infectious H5N1 were written by bird ecologists.

Apparently those that decry the OBVIOUS evidence of carriage aren't reading these papers. NOT MY PROBLEM - they can tap dance out their explanations to funding agencies, when they are shown to be thoroughly CLUELESS as to cause-and-effect mechanics behind the rise and spread of H5N1.

Oracle and others, Wild birds are carriers and poultry smuggling are carriers.

Doctor Niman made it clear since 2005 in the Quinhai incident.

Poultry smuggling and railroad, pave road, and so on are carriers indeed, Migratory birds are carriers too.


Plain facts.
 
Re: WTB says migratory birds not to be blamed for spread of bird flu in the country

AFAIK the viruses from Qinghai-lake and India,BDesh are different
 
Re: WTB says migratory birds not to be blamed for spread of bird flu in the country

only one sequence from 2007 or later at genbank and that matches
VNM/1203/2004.

India 2006 was closest to H5N1 from Italy,Krasnodar,Iran
 
Re: WTB says migratory birds not to be blamed for spread of bird flu in the country

No one is testing wild birds in Bangladesh, Tibet, or India.
India
This year long project jointly implemented by Wetlands International (WI) South Asia and Bombay Natural History Society (BNHS) for WCS was completed at the end of Quarter 8.

Objectives were to conduct AI surveillance with wild birds, to enhance
veterinary staff capacity to handle wild birds, to detect and respond to outbreaks, and to understand transmission of avian influenza strains in migratory and resident wild bird species.

Surveillance
? 308 samples of 24 species were collected in total for this subaward and sent to the High Security Animal Disease Laboratory (HSADL) in Bhopal between January 2007 and March 2008 from Chilika Lake. Of these, 216 samples from 22 species were collected during the 2007-2008 which included 25 sick birds of 6 species.
? 106 individuals of 22 species were sampled from Nandur Madhmeswar. Over
25% of these samples were garganey (Anas querquedula) and common teal (Anas crecca). All sampled individuals were ringed and released.
? Besides the regular study sites, samples were also collected from avian influenza outbreak areas in Manipur and West Bengal States. Two Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) outbreaks were reported in July 2007 from Manipur and in January 2008 in West Bengal. July is the lean period for migratory birds in India whereas January is the peak period for wintering birds. In both times, the AI was confirmed from poultry. During both outbreaks, the BNHS team visited those areas to collect samples. In Manipur, wild birds were sampled from the surrounding area of the outbreak zone (5 km away) and from Manipur Zoological Garden (MZG). Sampling was also carried out in the Loktak Lake area, 50 km from the reported outbreak zone. A total of 50 samples of 11 species were collected in Manipur.
? In West Bengal, outbreaks were reported from13 districts, but sampling had to be restricted to only four districts. The samples were collected from Ballavpur Wildlife Sanctuary and Bakreshwar Dam from Birbum district; Purbasthali in Burdwan district; Ahiron in Nadia-Murshidabad district, and Kulik & Balurghat in North Dinajpur district respectively. In total 168 birds of 44species were sampled and ringed. Samples collected from Chilka and Nandur-Madhmeshwar were sent to the High Security Animal Disease Laboratory (HSADL), Bhopal, and samples collected from the high risk areas were directly taken to the laboratory by the BNHS veterinarian. Final results are pending.
The India team made regular visits to local bird trapping families in communities in the southeast coast (Tamil Nadu) of India, to monitor the trade in wild waterbirds, although sampling was not conducted.

Training
Two highly successful training courses were held during January and February 2008 at Chilika, and Nandur-Madhmeshwar/Gangapur. The training programme at Chilika was timely, since an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza in domestic poultry was reported in West Bengal, a neighboring state.
? 19 participants representing Departments of Wildlife/Forests and Veterinary Svs. from Orissa, West Bengal, Chattisgarh and Andhra Pradesh were trained during the Chilka Training Workshop, held at the Wetland Research and Training Center of the Chilika Development Authority (CDA), Chandraput. Training aimed at understanding complex interactions between wild and domestic birds in the spread of the virus and emphasized the importance of coordinated actions by the veterinarians and wildlife agencies. Dr. Taej Mundkur, Deputy Wildlife Coordinator for Avian Influenza (FAO) participated as a trainer. The course emphasized hands-on practice in capturing, sampling and surveying wild birds imparting knowledge on epidemiology; developing criteria for AI surveillance in wild bird; and early detection and control of highly pathogenic AI (H5N1) in poultry in Maharashtra.
? 818 birds of 12 species were ringed at Chilika.
? 43 participants from 7 states (Maharashtra M.P., Kerala, Karnataka, Kolkata,
Chattisghar, Goa) participated in the course at Nandur-Madmeshwar/ Gangapur, along with Mr. Sayam Uddin Chowdhury and Dr. Sajahan Sarder from Nature Conservation Committee, Bangladesh. Dr. C.L. Trisal, Director of Wetlands International - South Asia, delivered the welcome address. Mr. Mohan, Conservator of Forests, Government of Maharashtra emphasized that the state had faced an AI outbreak in February 2006 without the benefit of a formal training program like this; he sent 20 forest officials from his state to receive training at the workshop.

Bird population counts in key wetland sites for migratory birds
? Regular fortnightly bird population monitoring was carried out at Chilika Lake
from January-May 2007 and November-December 2007. Monthly surveys were
carried out from August to October.
? 124 species were recorded in Chilika. Among the ducks, northern pintail (Anas acuta) was predominant followed by the gadwall (Anas strepera).
? 5000 brahminy shelduck and 1200 bar-headed geese were also recorded during different periods of the year 2007.
? The over 820,000 individuals recorded during the Asian Waterbird Count on 12 January 2007 was the maximum waterbirds number observed in Chilika Lake.
? Regular monthly field population monitoring activities were carried out at
Nandur-Madhmeswar from January to December 2007. A total of 78 bird species were recorded.
? Monthly population monitoring was carried out in the Karaivetty Waterbird
Sanctuary from January 2007 onwards. A total of 153 bird species were recorded at Karaivetty during the surveys. Garganey (Anas querquedula) was the most common species among all ducks, and northern pintail (Anas acuta) and northern shoveller (Anas clypeata) were common duck species. A record of 1,500 barheaded geese were recorded in February.
? Bird mortality at Chilika was significantly lower during 2007?08 season as
compared to the previous two seasons. The death rate had declined over 80% compared to 2005-06. However, samples from 25 sick birds of 6 species were collected and sent to the HSADL laboratory for testing for H5N1.
? A comprehensive manual on bird identification, bird population monitoring and AI surveillance that the team prepared is expected to be ready for printing shortly.

Strengthening of the Asian-Pacific Working Group on Migratory Waterbirds and Avian Influenza
The Working Group consists of representatives from major flyway countries and partner agencies (linking with the East Asian-Australasian Flyway Partnership and the Central Asian Flyway Action Plan). It provides a forum and framework for establishing flywaywide coordinated color marking protocols for higher risk species/groups and surveillance of selected species. The Group works with the established frameworks of the African-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement and American Flyways to build alliances with partner
agencies in areas of flyway and species overlaps. Specific activities include the creation of a website on banding, color marking and satellite tracking of waterbirds in the Asia-Pacific region (www.wetlands.tekdi.net). The site has been updated with responses and information from key contacts and experts in the region. Regular email group discussions have been held and updates of information on HPAI outbreaks in the region and relevant literature have been shared. WCS and its subawardee in India remain in close partnership with Dr. Sanjay Upadhyay (USAID), Dr. Mohinder Oberoi (FAO-India), and Dr. Scott Newman (FAO-Rome).
http://www.gains.org/Home/tabid/36/language/en-US/Default.aspx
------------------------------------------------------------------
I can post on the testing done in Mongolia, at Erhel Nuur and at Russia and Kazakhstan; but others may want to read the update for themselves.
 
Re: WTB says migratory birds not to be blamed for spread of bird flu in the country

India
This year long project jointly implemented by Wetlands International (WI) South Asia and Bombay Natural History Society (BNHS) for WCS was completed at the end of Quarter 8.

Objectives were to conduct AI surveillance with wild birds, to enhance
veterinary staff capacity to handle wild birds, to detect and respond to outbreaks, and to understand transmission of avian influenza strains in migratory and resident wild bird species.

Surveillance
• 308 samples of 24 species were collected in total for this subaward and sent to the High Security Animal Disease Laboratory (HSADL) in Bhopal between January 2007 and March 2008 from Chilika Lake. Of these, 216 samples from 22 species were collected during the 2007-2008 which included 25 sick birds of 6 species.
• 106 individuals of 22 species were sampled from Nandur Madhmeswar. Over
25% of these samples were garganey (Anas querquedula) and common teal (Anas crecca). All sampled individuals were ringed and released.
• Besides the regular study sites, samples were also collected from avian influenza outbreak areas in Manipur and West Bengal States. Two Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) outbreaks were reported in July 2007 from Manipur and in January 2008 in West Bengal. July is the lean period for migratory birds in India whereas January is the peak period for wintering birds. In both times, the AI was confirmed from poultry. During both outbreaks, the BNHS team visited those areas to collect samples. In Manipur, wild birds were sampled from the surrounding area of the outbreak zone (5 km away) and from Manipur Zoological Garden (MZG). Sampling was also carried out in the Loktak Lake area, 50 km from the reported outbreak zone. A total of 50 samples of 11 species were collected in Manipur.
• In West Bengal, outbreaks were reported from13 districts, but sampling had to be restricted to only four districts. The samples were collected from Ballavpur Wildlife Sanctuary and Bakreshwar Dam from Birbum district; Purbasthali in Burdwan district; Ahiron in Nadia-Murshidabad district, and Kulik & Balurghat in North Dinajpur district respectively. In total 168 birds of 44species were sampled and ringed. Samples collected from Chilka and Nandur-Madhmeshwar were sent to the High Security Animal Disease Laboratory (HSADL), Bhopal, and samples collected from the high risk areas were directly taken to the laboratory by the BNHS veterinarian. Final results are pending.
The India team made regular visits to local bird trapping families in communities in the southeast coast (Tamil Nadu) of India, to monitor the trade in wild waterbirds, although sampling was not conducted.

Training
Two highly successful training courses were held during January and February 2008 at Chilika, and Nandur-Madhmeshwar/Gangapur. The training programme at Chilika was timely, since an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza in domestic poultry was reported in West Bengal, a neighboring state.
• 19 participants representing Departments of Wildlife/Forests and Veterinary Svs. from Orissa, West Bengal, Chattisgarh and Andhra Pradesh were trained during the Chilka Training Workshop, held at the Wetland Research and Training Center of the Chilika Development Authority (CDA), Chandraput. Training aimed at understanding complex interactions between wild and domestic birds in the spread of the virus and emphasized the importance of coordinated actions by the veterinarians and wildlife agencies. Dr. Taej Mundkur, Deputy Wildlife Coordinator for Avian Influenza (FAO) participated as a trainer. The course emphasized hands-on practice in capturing, sampling and surveying wild birds imparting knowledge on epidemiology; developing criteria for AI surveillance in wild bird; and early detection and control of highly pathogenic AI (H5N1) in poultry in Maharashtra.
• 818 birds of 12 species were ringed at Chilika.
• 43 participants from 7 states (Maharashtra M.P., Kerala, Karnataka, Kolkata,
Chattisghar, Goa) participated in the course at Nandur-Madmeshwar/ Gangapur, along with Mr. Sayam Uddin Chowdhury and Dr. Sajahan Sarder from Nature Conservation Committee, Bangladesh. Dr. C.L. Trisal, Director of Wetlands International - South Asia, delivered the welcome address. Mr. Mohan, Conservator of Forests, Government of Maharashtra emphasized that the state had faced an AI outbreak in February 2006 without the benefit of a formal training program like this; he sent 20 forest officials from his state to receive training at the workshop.

Bird population counts in key wetland sites for migratory birds
• Regular fortnightly bird population monitoring was carried out at Chilika Lake
from January-May 2007 and November-December 2007. Monthly surveys were
carried out from August to October.
• 124 species were recorded in Chilika. Among the ducks, northern pintail (Anas acuta) was predominant followed by the gadwall (Anas strepera).
• 5000 brahminy shelduck and 1200 bar-headed geese were also recorded during different periods of the year 2007.
• The over 820,000 individuals recorded during the Asian Waterbird Count on 12 January 2007 was the maximum waterbirds number observed in Chilika Lake.
• Regular monthly field population monitoring activities were carried out at
Nandur-Madhmeswar from January to December 2007. A total of 78 bird species were recorded.
• Monthly population monitoring was carried out in the Karaivetty Waterbird
Sanctuary from January 2007 onwards. A total of 153 bird species were recorded at Karaivetty during the surveys. Garganey (Anas querquedula) was the most common species among all ducks, and northern pintail (Anas acuta) and northern shoveller (Anas clypeata) were common duck species. A record of 1,500 barheaded geese were recorded in February.
• Bird mortality at Chilika was significantly lower during 2007–08 season as
compared to the previous two seasons. The death rate had declined over 80% compared to 2005-06. However, samples from 25 sick birds of 6 species were collected and sent to the HSADL laboratory for testing for H5N1.
• A comprehensive manual on bird identification, bird population monitoring and AI surveillance that the team prepared is expected to be ready for printing shortly.

Strengthening of the Asian-Pacific Working Group on Migratory Waterbirds and Avian Influenza
The Working Group consists of representatives from major flyway countries and partner agencies (linking with the East Asian-Australasian Flyway Partnership and the Central Asian Flyway Action Plan). It provides a forum and framework for establishing flywaywide coordinated color marking protocols for higher risk species/groups and surveillance of selected species. The Group works with the established frameworks of the African-Eurasian Waterbird Agreement and American Flyways to build alliances with partner
agencies in areas of flyway and species overlaps. Specific activities include the creation of a website on banding, color marking and satellite tracking of waterbirds in the Asia-Pacific region (www.wetlands.tekdi.net). The site has been updated with responses and information from key contacts and experts in the region. Regular email group discussions have been held and updates of information on HPAI outbreaks in the region and relevant literature have been shared. WCS and its subawardee in India remain in close partnership with Dr. Sanjay Upadhyay (USAID), Dr. Mohinder Oberoi (FAO-India), and Dr. Scott Newman (FAO-Rome).
http://www.gains.org/Home/tabid/36/language/en-US/Default.aspx
------------------------------------------------------------------
I can post on the testing done in Mongolia, at Erhel Nuur and at Russia and Kazakhstan; but others may want to read the update for themselves.
The conservation groups test cloacal swabs (or 350,000 fecal samples), which are negative for clade 2.2. As was seen in experimaental infections, isolation of H5N1 from experimentally infected birds is limited to 24 hours. Testing of a few hundred live birds (and far fewer dead or dying birds) is a joke (as was clearly demonstrated in Mongolia in the summer of 2005 when these groups failed to detect H5N1 in live birds at Erhel Lake, where H5N1 infected dead birds were reported).

This is a propaganda exercise. This wild bird issue was settled in 2005.

Note that these groups NEVER discuss H5 antibodies in wild birds (resident and migrating).
 
Re: WTB says migratory birds not to be blamed for spread of bird flu in the country

only one sequence from 2007 or later at genbank and that matches
VNM/1203/2004.

India 2006 was closest to H5N1 from Italy,Krasnodar,Iran
Please. Italy/Krasnodar/Iran were clade 2.2.3.

Isolates from Pakistan from 2007 were also clade 2.2.3.

You need to get an understanding of phylogenetic analysis.

You continue to post nonsense.
 
Back
Top Bottom