Re: H5N1 Expenditures: Summary by Country
Getting there....this is a table, but I don't know how to post it as such in this forum, from
http://www.fin.gc.ca/wp/2007-04e.html
on page 56. (once you get the free .pdf)
But note, for the US, also
http://healthyamericans.org/reports/flurecession/FluRecession.pdf
which CIDRAP is quoting.
J.
Table 6.13: GDP Impacts of Pandemic Scenarios: Comparison of Studies
Study Scenario Characteristics Pandemic Year GDP Impacts
This study ? 1918 scenario ?
base case
1918 mortality (0.4 per cent) Canada: -0.4 to -0.9 per cent;
Similar impacts in other advanced
economies and in emerging
economies
This study ? 1918 scenario ?
with workplace-avoidance
absenteeism
1918 mortality (0.4 per cent) Canada: -0.4 to ?1.1 per cent;
Similar impacts in other advanced
economies and in emerging
economies
This study ? 1957 scenario 1957 mortality (0.04 per cent) Canada: -0.1 to -0.3; Similar
impacts in other advanced
economies and in emerging
economies
CBO (1) Mortality double that of 1918 U.S.: -5 per cent
CBO (2) 1957 mortality U.S.: - 1.5 per cent
Kennedy et al. (Australian
Treasury)
Mortality half that of 1918 Australia: -9.3 per cent
McKibbin and Sidorenko (1) Mortality roughly double that of
1918 in advanced economies
U.S.: -5.5; Canada: -5.7; Japan: -
15.8; Europe: -8.0; Singapore: -
21.7; Philippines: -37.8; LDCs: -
12.2
McKibbin and Sidorenko (2) 1918 mortality U.S.: -3.0; Canada: -3.1; Japan: -
8.36; Europe: -4.3; Singapore: -
11.2; Philippines: -19.3; LDCs: -
6.3
McKibbin and Sidorenko (3) 1957 mortality U.S.: -1.4; Canada: -1.5; Japan: -
3.3; Europe: -1.9; Singapore: -4.4;
Philippines: -7.3; LDCs: -2.4
McKibbin and Sidorenko (4) 1968 mortality U.S.: -0.6; Canada: -0.7; Japan: -
1.0; Europe: -0.7; Singapore: -0.9;
Philippines: -1.5; LDCs: -0.69
Bloom, Wit et al. (ADB) Mortality double that of 1957 Asia: -2.6 to -6.8
Jonung and R?ger (1) Same as CBO(1) E.U.: -1.6