• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

DRC – 17th Ebola Outbreak (Bundibugyo virus) - Concerns over reliability of Government reported cumulative cases and deaths - May 2026+

Rwanda Closes Rubavu Borders Over Ebola Outbreak in DR Congo

May 17, 2026
facebook.svg

whatsapp.svg
Authorities in Rubavu District have confirmed the closure of border crossings linking Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo through Rubavu following the resurgence of the Ebola virus in eastern DR Congo.

Rubavu District Mayor, Mulindwa Prosper, told UMUSEKE that the measure came into effect on the morning of Sunday, May 17, 2026, as part of efforts to halt cross-border movement and prevent the deadly virus from spreading into Rwanda.

He explained that Rwandan citizens currently in DR Congo are still being allowed to return home under strict health screening procedures.

“Every Rwandan has the right to return to their country, just as Congolese citizens have the right to return to theirs. At the borders, health authorities are conducting the necessary screening measures,” he said.

According to the mayor, all travelers crossing the border are undergoing Ebola screening, while hygiene measures and public…
​:tiphat:
https://www.kigalitimes.rw/2026/05/17/rwanda-closes-rubavu-borders-over-ebola-outbreak-in-dr-congo/
 
WHO convenes partners to strengthen Ebola response in the Democratic Republic of the Congo

17 May 2026
Brazzaville/Kinshasa — As part of efforts to support the ongoing response to the Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the World Health Organization convened governments, partners and technical agencies to align response priorities and reinforce preparedness across affected and neighbouring countries.

The outbreak has affected several health zones in Ituri Province, including Mongbwalu, Rwampara and Bunia, where health authorities are responding to confirmed cases, suspected deaths and infections among healthcare workers. The evolving situation, combined with insecurity and population mobility linked to mining and trade activities, continues to complicate response efforts and increase the risk of wider transmission.

WHO is reinforcing support to national and provincial authorities through deployment of technical expertise and emergency supplies to strengthen surveillance, case investigation, infection prevention and control, laboratory capacity, clinical care and community engagement activities.

Additional specialists in epidemiology, logistics, laboratory diagnostics, clinical care and community engagement are being mobilized to support frontline teams and help strengthen outbreak control measures in affected areas.

“Clear coordination mechanisms at provincial level will be critical to help partners rapidly align and mobilize support where it is most needed,” said Dr Mir Rahimzai, FHI 360.

Participants highlighted the importance of strong community engagement and coordinated operational approaches to strengthen public trust and support response efforts in affected communities.

The meeting brought together more than 220 participants from WHO, Ministries of Health, Africa CDC, UN agencies, humanitarian organizations, research institutions and partners following the official declaration of the outbreak by the Government of the Democratic Republic of the Congo on 15 May.

Partners are expanding response activities on the ground. Médecins Sans Frontières is supporting patient isolation and infection prevention and control activities in Mongbwalu and Bunia, while additional teams and supplies are being mobilized for deployment to the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda.

The World Food Programme confirmed readiness to support airlift operations between Kinshasa and Bunia to facilitate rapid delivery of emergency supplies and equipment to affected areas.

The International Organization for Migration is supporting preparedness and surveillance activities at points of entry and along key cross-border corridors linking the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Uganda and South Sudan.

“Cross-border population movement remains a key factor in this outbreak. IOM teams are already supporting preparedness and surveillance efforts on the ground in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda,” said Dr Jerry Geoffrey Mtike, IOM.

Countries across the region are also strengthening readiness measures to reduce the risk of further spread. Zambia highlighted vulnerabilities linked to mining and trade corridors and identified diagnostic capacity, sample transport systems and cross-border surveillance among key preparedness priorities.

Dr Francis Kasolo, WHO Representative, Ethiopia, underscored the importance of strengthening preparedness beyond land borders, including air travel routes, and called for pre-positioning of essential supplies in high-risk countries.


WHO is also scaling up regional readiness activities, including deployment of supplies, laboratory coordination and development of a multi-country Strategic Preparedness and Response Plan with partners. Priority countries are being supported to strengthen emergency coordination, border surveillance, healthcare worker training and contingency planning to enhance readiness and reduce the risk of further spread.



For Additional Information or to Request Interviews, Please contact:
Chinyere Nwonye

Emergencies Communications Officer
WHO Africa Regional Office
nwonyec@who.int
+2348034645524

Collins Boakye-Agyemang

Communications and marketing officer
Tel: + 242 06 520 65 65 (WhatsApp)
Email: boakyeagyemangc@who.int
​:tiphat:
https://www.afro.who.int/news/who-c...then-ebola-response-democratic-republic-congo
 
Ebola confirmed in east DR Congo city held by Rwanda-backed militia

A laboratory has confirmed an Ebola case in the major eastern Democratic Republic of Congo city of Goma.

59 minutes ago

A laboratory has confirmed an Ebola case in the major eastern Democratic Republic of Congo city of Goma, under the control of the Rwanda-backed M23 militia, health authorities told AFP on Sunday.
​A positive case in Goma has been confirmed by tests carried out by the laboratory. It involves the wife of a man who died of Ebola in Bunia, who travelled to Goma after her husband’s death whilst already infected
,” Professor Jean-Jacques Muyembe, director of the Congolese National Institute for Biomedical Research (INRB), told AFP.​
:tiphat:
https://witness.co.za/news/2026/05/...-dr-congo-city-held-by-rwanda-backed-militia/
 
People from the #Ebola outbreak areas of the #Ituri province who could be infected have been identified in the province of #Kivu North. As was to be feared, the virus is moving #RDC
:tiphat:
sK7wJV7c_normal.jpg

CongoActual
@CongoActual
·
1h
Se han identificado en la provincia de #Kivu Norte personas procedentes de las zonas del brote de Ébola de la provincia​
 
TreyfishN
·
20s
13 m #Ebola outbreak Bundibugyo: #Canary Islands receives maritime arrivals from the African continent every day and this makes it even more important to strengthen health controls, epidemiological surveillance and early detection protocols.
:tiphat:
fIU3sNB0_normal.jpg

CVCANARIAS
@cvcanarias
·
15m
Translated from Spanish
Ebola Bundibugyo Outbreak: #Canarias receives daily maritime arrivals from the African continent, and this makes it even more important to strengthen health​
 
The Congolese Ministry of Public Health has denied, through the National Institute of Public Health (INSP), any presence of confirmed Ebola cases in Kinshasa. This denial comes as the WHO stated on Saturday, May 16, in its international public health emergency declaration, that a confirmed case had been detected in the Congolese capital in a person returning from Ituri. This contradiction between national health authorities and the UN organization is sowing confusion about the true state of the virus's spread, at a time when the transparency of information is a central issue in the epidemic response.:rolleyes:
 
:tiphat:
Georges Kisando Sokomeka
@GeorgesKisando
Translated from French
#Ebola: The Military Governor of North Kivu, Évariste Somo Kakule, formally prohibits the transport of deceased bodies without authorization signed by the competent health authority. This measure is part of efforts to prevent the spread of the virus, with authorities reminding that handling contaminated remains can facilitate transmission. Families are urged to collaborate with teams responsible for dignified and secure burials in cases of suspected deaths. Any suspected case or death must be reported to the toll-free number: 082 080 0001. Eka News​
 
Related to posts #23 & 24

Hat tip to MAO ZIGABE@maozigabe

image.png - Click image for larger version  Name:	image.png Views:	11 Size:	896.6 KB ID:	1034968

image.png - Click image for larger version  Name:	image.png Views:	11 Size:	839.4 KB ID:	1034969

-------------------------------------------------

English translation by Grok

DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF THE CONGO
NORTH KIVU PROVINCE
The Governor
OFFICIAL DECLARATION OF THE GOVERNOR OF NORTH KIVU PROVINCE
STRENGTHENING OF PREVENTIVE MEASURES AGAINST EBOLA VIRUS DISEASE (BUNDIBUGYO STRAIN)


The Governorate of North Kivu Province informs the population that a first confirmed case of Ebola Virus Disease (EVD), Bundibugyo strain, has been detected in the city of Goma.

According to the initial information gathered by the health services, the confirmed case reportedly came recently from Bunia, in Ituri Province, where a flare-up of the disease is currently the subject of reinforced medical care.

Upon confirmation of this case, the provincial authorities, in coordination with the health services and local medical structures, have immediately activated the response mechanisms to prevent any spread of the disease in the areas under the administration of the AFC/M23.

The patient has been taken into care and isolated in accordance with the sanitary protocols in force. Contact tracing and follow-up operations are underway to rapidly identify all persons who may have been exposed.

Furthermore, reinforced sanitary measures have been put in place in health facilities, at entry and exit points, as well as in areas with high population density. Medical and epidemiological surveillance teams remain mobilized throughout the affected territory.

The Governorate, through its technical service which is the Provincial Health Division, recalls that Ebola virus disease is transmitted through direct contact with blood, biological fluids, contaminated objects or infected persons presenting symptoms. It is not transmitted through the air.The most frequent symptoms are notably:
  • Sudden fever
  • Severe headaches
  • Muscle and joint pain and intense fatigue
  • Vomiting and diarrhea
  • Generalized weakness
  • Unexplained bleeding
Faced with this situation, the population is called upon to strictly observe the following measures:
  • Avoid any physical contact with persons presenting suspicious signs;
  • Wash hands regularly with clean water and soap;
  • Avoid any contact with biological fluids;
  • Immediately report any suspected case to the health authorities or the nearest health facility;
  • Follow the instructions given by medical teams and local authorities.
The Provincial Governor reassures the population that all necessary measures have been taken to protect the inhabitants and rapidly contain this health threat. The competent services are working in close coordination with available health partners to ensure a rapid and effective response.

The population is invited to remain calm, avoid the spread of rumors and continue their normal activities while rigorously respecting the prevention and public hygiene guidelines.

On the same occasion, the provincial authority instructs all local authorities to actively engage in ensuring the effective implementation of surveillance and case management measures for Ebola virus disease, in close collaboration with health teams.Done in Goma, on 16 May 2026

Bahati Musanga Erasto
Governor of North Kivu Province
Address: Avenue du Lac, Quartier Himbi, Commune de Goma, Goma/RDC
E-mail: gouvernoratnk25@gmail.com

 
Translation Google

"All the elements are in place for a large-scale epidemic": a Belgian specialist warns of the new Ebola strain

by Thomas D'Alessandro
Published on May 17 at 4:42 PM

In the Democratic Republic of Congo, a variant of the Ebola virus is causing concern, especially since there is currently no specific treatment or vaccine for this strain.

All the elements are in place for a major Ebola virus outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Uganda, according to Laurens Liesenborghs, a specialist at the Institute of Tropical Medicine in Antwerp (ITM). On Sunday, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared the spread of this rare strain of the virus a "public health emergency of international concern," its second-highest alert level.

Several major factors are contributing to this rapid transmission of the virus, according to Mr. Liesenborghs. First, the outbreak is located in an urbanized area, as well as a conflict zone. Second, the virus was detected relatively late compared to other epidemics. Finally, it involves a rare variant of the disease, which is not detected by the vast majority of tests available in the region. All these elements mean that the epidemic is now evolving quite rapidly. "New information is coming in at a breakneck pace. The first positive cases were only confirmed on Friday, but the epidemic has probably been ongoing for longer. It has also spread more widely than initially thought," the researcher emphasizes.

No vaccine or treatment
The Ebola virus was discovered by the Belgian Peter Piot in the late 1970s. This is why the Institute of Tropical Medicine (ITM) is closely involved in international research on this disease. Experts from the Institute, including Laurens Liesenborghs, will therefore be traveling to the Democratic Republic of Congo this week. Additional testing kits are also already being shipped. "First and foremost, we will assess the needs on the ground," continues Mr. Liesenborghs. "Then, we will have to determine how and where to provide the best possible support."

Specifically, the Institute of Tropical Medicine (ITM) aims to quickly launch a clinical trial, in collaboration with the WHO, to develop new treatments. "There is a need for specific medications for this variant," the expert states. Indeed, there is currently no vaccine or specific treatment to stem the spread of the Bundibugyo strain responsible for the current epidemic, which has a high fatality rate.

https://www.rtl.be/actu/monde/inter...leur-un-specialiste/2026-05-17/article/788890
 
Ebola Disease: Current Situation

For Everyone
MAY 17, 2026 KEY POINTS
  • CDC is monitoring an outbreak of Ebola disease in remote areas of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Uganda.
  • To date, no cases of Ebola disease have been confirmed in the United States because of this outbreak.
  • The overall risk to the American public and travelers remains low.
Current situation
  • In early May, a hospital in Bunia Health Zone in northeastern DRC identified a cluster of severe illnesses affecting healthcare workers.
  • Initial samples tested in DRC were negative for Ebola virus, but by May 15, 8 out of 13 samples tested positive, and 5 were inconclusive. Using genetic fingerprinting, the illnesses were identified as Bundibugyo (Bun-dee-BOO-joh) virus, one of the 4 types of orthoebolavirusesthat cause Ebola disease in people.
  • There is no vaccine for Bundibugyo virus, and treatment consists of supportive care.
  • As of May 16, there are 8 laboratory-confirmed cases in DRC and reports of 248 suspected cases and 80 suspected deaths for a death rate of 32%, although these numbers are subject to change as the outbreak evolves.
  • Historically, Bundibugyo virus has death rates ranging from 25-50%.
  • Patients have experienced classic Ebola disease symptomslike fever, headache, vomiting, severe weakness, abdominal pain, nosebleeds, and vomiting blood.
  • Most cases to date have been in people between 20 and 39 years old, and two-thirds have been in female patients.
  • On May 15 and 16, the Uganda Ministry of Health (MoH) confirmed two cases, including one death, in people who traveled from DRC. No further spread has been reported.
CDC response


CDC is supporting response efforts through our country offices in DRC and Uganda to provide technical assistance with:
  • Disease tracking and contact tracing
  • Laboratory sample collection and virus sequencing
  • Infection prevention and control (IPC) efforts
  • Local border screening
  • Coordinating with affected countries and international public health partners
  • Providing personal protective equipment (PPE) and infection control supplies
  • Risk communication and community engagement in affected areas
Resources
​:tiphat:
https://www.cdc.gov/ebola/situation-summary/index.html
 
image.png


Ebola disease caused by Bundibugyo virus, Democratic Republic of the Congo (The) & Uganda

16 May 2026

Situation at a glance

On 5 May 2026, the World Health Organization (WHO) was alerted of a high-mortality outbreak of unknown illness in Mongbwalu Health Zone, Ituri Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), including deaths among health workers. On 14 May 2026, the Institut national de recherche biomédicale (INRB) Kinshasa analyzed 13 blood samples from Rwampara Health Zone, Ituri Province. Laboratory analysis confirmed Bundibugyo virus disease (BVD) in eight of these samples on 15 May, a species of Ebola. The case fatality rates in the past two BVD outbreaks have ranged from 30% to 50%. Unlike Ebola virus disease, there is no licensed vaccine or specific therapeutics against Bundibugyo virus, though early supportive care is lifesaving. On 15 May 2026, the Ministry of Public Health, Hygiene and Social Welfare, DRC, officially declared the 17th Ebola Disease outbreak in DRC. Concurrently, the Uganda Ministry of Health confirmed an outbreak of BVD following the identification of one imported case from DRC, a Congolese man who died in the capital city of Kampala. On 16 May 2026, WHO Director-General, after having consulted the States Parties where the event is known to be currently occurring, determined that the Ebola disease caused by Bundibugyo virus in DRC and Uganda constitutes a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC), as defined in the provisions of IHR. Response measures include deployment of rapid response teams, delivery of medical supplies, strengthened surveillance, laboratory confirmation, infection prevention and control assessments, the set-up of safe treatment centers, and community engagement. WHO is supporting the coordination of the response, case management, and cross-border preparedness. WHO advice has been issued to countries.

Description of the situation


On 5 May 2026, WHO received an alert regarding an unknown illness with high mortality reported in Mongbwalu Health Zone, Ituri Province, including four health workers who died within four days. Following an in-depth investigation by the rapid response team in Mongbwalu and Rwampara health zones (HZ) on 13 May, the outbreak was subsequently confirmed as Bundibugyo virus disease (BVD) due to Bundibugyo virus (BDBV) (Orthoebolavirus bundibugyoense, species) on 15 May.

On 15 May 2026, the Ministry of Public Health, Hygiene and Social Welfare officially declared the 17[SUP]th[/SUP] Ebola Disease outbreak in the DRC, occurring in Rwampara, Mongwalu and Bunia HZ.

The first currently known suspected case, a health worker, reported onset of symptoms including fever, hemorrhaging, vomiting and intense malaise on 24 April 2026. The case died at a medical centre in Bunia.


As of 15 May, a total of 246 suspected cases and 80 deaths (four deaths among confirmed cases) have been reported from three HZ: Rwampara (six health areas affected), Mongbwalu (three health areas affected), and Bunia . Twenty four suspected cases are currently in isolation facilities across the three HZ. In addition, unusual clusters of community deaths with symptoms compatible with Bundibugyo virus disease (BVD) are being investigated across other HZ in Ituri and North Kivu.


A further case reported on 16 May, an individual returning from Ituri to Kinshasa, has tested NEGATIVE for Bundibugyo virus on confirmatory testing by the Institut National de la Recherche Biomédicale (INRB) of DRC, and is therefore not considered a confirmed case.


Most of the suspected cases are between 20 and 39 years old, with females accounting for over 60%, suggesting significant risks associated with household and caregiver transmission.

Initial testing of 20 samples collected in Rwampara HZ and analysed at the Provincial Public Health Laboratory in Bunia using standard Ebola Xpert were negative for Ebola virus. Samples were sent to INRB for further analysis, of which eight samples analysed were confirmed as Orthoebolavirus by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on 15 May. Genomic sequencing confirmed the virus species as Bundibugyo virus (BDBV).

As of 15 May, 65 contacts have been listed, with 15 identified as high-risk. However, follow-up remains weak due to insecurity and movement restrictions. Several listed contacts became symptomatic and died before they could be isolated.


On 15 May 2026, the Ministry of Health of Uganda confirmed an outbreak of BVD following the identification of an imported case from the DRC. The case is an elderly man who was admitted to a private hospital on 11 May with severe symptoms and died on 14 May. The post-mortem transfer of the body to DRC was completed the same day. A clinical sample collected when the case was admitted on 11 May was tested at the Central Emergency Surveillance and Response Support Laboratory, Wandegeya, and was confirmed as Bundibugyo virus on 15 May 2026. A second imported case was confirmed on 16 May in Kampala, in an individual returning from DRC with no apparent links to the first case. At the time of reporting, no local transmission has been identified in Uganda.

On 16 May 2026, the Director-General of WHO, after having consulted the States Parties where the event is known to be currently occurring as defined in the provisions of the International Health Regulations (2005) (IHR), determined that the Ebola disease caused by Bundibugyo virus in DRC and Uganda constitutes a PHEIC.

It is currently thought that the event originated in the Mongbwalu HZ, DRC, a high-traffic mining area, with cases subsequently migrating to Rwampara and Bunia to seek medical care. Ituri province borders South Sudan and Uganda (and Bunia HZ is less than 500km from Uganda). A full epidemiological investigation and trace back exercise is ongoing.

Ituri’s role as a commercial and migratory hub and proximity to Uganda and South Sudan increases the risk of regional exportation and cross-border transmission.


Figure 1. Health Zones affected by Bundibugyo virus disease in Democratic Republic of Congo, as of 16 May 2026

Map_Ebola disease caused by Bundibugyo virus DRC - Map_Ebola disease caused by Bundibugyo virus DRC
Epidemiology


Bundibugyo virus disease (BVD) is a severe and often fatal form of Ebola disease caused by the Bundibugyo virus, one of the Orthoebolavirus species. It is a zoonotic disease, with fruit bats suspected to be the natural reservoir. Human infection occurs through close contact with the blood or secretions of infected wildlife, such as bats or non-human primates, and subsequently spreads from person to person through direct contact with the blood, secretions, organs, or other bodily fluids of infected individuals or contaminated surfaces. Transmission is particularly amplified in health-care settings when infection prevention and control (IPC) measures are inadequate, and during unsafe burial practices involving direct contact with the deceased.

The incubation period for BVD ranges from 2 to 21 days, and individuals are usually not infectious until symptom onset. Early symptoms are non-specific, including fever, fatigue, muscle pain, headache, and sore throat, which complicates clinical diagnosis and can delay detection. These progress to gastrointestinal symptoms, organ dysfunction, and in some cases haemorrhagic manifestations. Case fatality rates in the past two BVD outbreaks, reported in Uganda and in DRC in 2007 and 2012, have ranged from approximately 30% to 50%.

Differentiating BVD from other endemic febrile illnesses such as malaria is challenging without laboratory confirmation using PCR or antigen/antibody-based assays. Control relies on rapid case identification, isolation and care, contact tracing, safe burials, and strong community engagement, as no approved vaccines or specific treatments currently exist for BVD.

Public health response


Health authorities in DRC are implementing public health measures, including but not limited to the following:


Coordination
  • Rapid response teams have been deployed to Rwampara and Mongbwalu HZ.
  • Provincial coordination andemergency meetings by le centre d’operation des urgences en sante publique (COUSP) have been held.
Surveillance and Laboratory
  • Surveillance for suspected and probable cases is ongoing (including at relevant Points of Entry and borders).
  • Operational case definitions have been elaborated in Ituri.
  • Sequencing confirmed Bundibugyo virus in positive RT-PCR samples.
Risk Communication and Community Engagement (RCCE)
  • Social mobilization meeting was held with community leaders in the Rural commune of Mongbwalu under the leadership of the Mayor.
Infection Prevention and Control (IPC)
  • IPC assessment in key health facilities is ongoing: Bunia Hospital Centre of the Evangelical Medical Centre (CME), Mongbwalu General Referral Hospital and Abelkozo Health Centre.
  • CME Bunia is maintaining isolation protocols. Healthcare workers have been briefed on the specific diagnostic profile of this strain.
Logistics
  • Logistical support has been provided for investigations in Mongbwalu and Rwampara Health Zones.
  • Support has been provided for the transportation of samples to INRB Kinshasa.
Health authorities in Uganda are implementing public health measures, including but not limited to the following:
  • Activating national and district-level emergency measures, including enhanced surveillance, screening at borders, deployment of rapid response teams, isolation of a high-risk contact, and quarantine of all identified contacts.
  • Strengthening of preparedness activities such as mobile laboratory deployment, infection prevention, and risk communication.
  • Rapid response readiness teams have been deployed at all official and informal points of entry along the western border, major transit routes, and pilgrimage corridors.
  • Advising health workers to remain vigilant and adhere strictly to infection prevention measures.
WHO is supporting the national authorities, including through:
  • Deployment of technical expertise and rapid response teams to support response efforts.
  • Deployment of IPC, clinical management and sample collection kits.
  • Identification of isolation facilities for case management in Bunia, Rwampara, and Mongbwalu HZ .
  • Dissemination of WHO case management protocol.
  • In-depth investigations and listing of contacts of suspected/probable cases.
  • Strengthening epidemiological surveillance, IPC and RCCE at all points of entry.
  • Strengthening Point of Entry (PoE) screening and cross border coordination, including mass gatherings.
  • Supporting the Ministry of Health in implementation of the Response Plan and WHO internal Response Plan.
  • Following up with the IHR National Focal Points (IHR NFP) in DRC and Uganda on the official IHR notification while concurrently managing communication across the IHR NFP network to ensure timely coordination.
  • Coordinating the delivery of key supplies.
  • Engaging experts on research and development priorities.
WHO risk assessment


On 16 May 2026, WHO Director-General, after having consulted the States Parties where the event is known to be currently occurring, determined that the Ebola disease caused by Bundibugyo virus in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda constitutes a public health emergency of international concern (PHEIC), as per the provisions of the IHR. Temporary recommendations for State Parties will be issued. In the meantime, WHO issued advice to countries, as stated below.


This is the 17th Ebola disease outbreak in the DRC since 1976. The last Ebola disease outbreak in the country was declared on 4 September 2025 with total of 64 cases (53 confirmed, 11 probable), including 45 deaths (CFR 70.3%), reported from six health areas in Bulape Health Zone, Kasai Province. The end of outbreak was declared on 1 December 2025. The last BVD outbreak was reported on 17 August 2012 by the DRC Ministry of Health in Province Orientale. A total of 59 cases, 38 confirmed and 21 probable cases, including 34 deaths were reported. The outbreak was declared over on 26 November 2012 by the MOH.


This outbreak is occurring in a complex epidemiological and humanitarian context. A critical four-week detection gap between the onset of symptoms of the presumed index case (25 April 2026) and the laboratory confirmation of the outbreak (14 May 2025) suggests a low clinical index of suspicion among healthcare providers. This is compounded by the presence of co-circulating arboviruses and influenza-like illnesses, masking the initial index of suspicion for Ebola disease and exacerbating community transmission. Furthermore, the infection and death of four healthcare workers within a four-day span at Mongbwalu General Referral Hospital underscores critical breaches in IPC protocols. A large number of community deaths has been reported potentially associated with unsafe burial practices.


Ongoing conflict in Ituri province restricts the movement of surveillance teams, limits the deployment of Rapid Response Teams, and hinders the secure transport of laboratory samples. Contact tracing is challenging due to difficult access and highly mobile populations, increasing the risk of high-risk contacts being lost to follow up or never identified.


Ituri’s role as a commercial and migratory hub increases the risk of regional exportation. The proximity to Uganda and South Sudan increases the risk of cross-border transmission if PoE screening and cross border coordination and information sharing are not immediately reinforced. On 15 May 2026, the Ministry of Health of Uganda reported an imported case of BVD.


Humanitarian needs in the area are dire. Ituri has 273 403 displaced people, with a total of 1.9 million people in need according to the Humanitarian Response Plan 2026 for DRC. From January to March 2026, 32 600 newly displaced and 30 200 returnees were recorded. The province recorded 5800 protection incidents and 11 incidents against humanitarian actors.

Unlike Ebola virus disease, there is no licensed vaccine or specific therapeutics against BDBV. Research and development activities are activated to coordinate efforts to advance potential candidate medical countermeasures. Response and outbreak control relies entirely on a range of interventions and public health measures that will need to be thoroughly implemented, including supportive care, early detection, adequate IPC, rigorous contact tracing, safe burials, and community engagement.

WHO advice


For countries where the event is occurring (the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda)

Coordination and high-level engagement
  • Activate their national disaster/emergency management mechanisms and establish an emergency operation centre, under the authority of the Head of State and relevant government authority, to coordinate response activities across partners and sectors to ensure efficient and effective implementation and monitoring of comprehensive Bundibugyo virus disease control measures. These measures must include enhanced surveillance including contact tracing, infection prevention and control (IPC), risk communication and community engagement, laboratory diagnostic testing, and case management. Coordination and response mechanisms should be established at national level, as well as at subnational level in affected areas and at-risk areas.
  • Should national capacities be overwhelmed, collaboration with partners should be enhanced to strengthen operations and ensure the ability to implement control measures in all affected and neighbouring areas.
Risk communication and community engagement
  • Ensure that there is a large-scale and sustained effort to fully engage the community – through local, religious and traditional leaders and healers – so communities play a central role in case identification, contact tracing and risk education; the population should be made fully aware of the benefits of early treatment.
  • Strengthen community awareness, engagement, and participation in particular to identify and address cultural norms and beliefs that serve as barriers to their full participation in the response, and integrate the response within the wider response required to address the needs of the population, particularly in contexts of the protracted humanitarian crisis in Eastern DRC.
Surveillance and laboratory
  • Strengthening surveillance and laboratory capacity across affected provinces and neighbouring provinces, through the establishment of (1) dedicated surveillance and response cells within affected health zones and across key at-risk neighbouring health zones; (2) enhanced community surveillance, particularly focused on community deaths; and (3) decentralized laboratory capacity for testing of Bundibugyo virus.
Infection prevention and control in health facilities and in the context of care
  • Strengthen measures to prevent nosocomial infections, including systematic mapping of health facilities, triage, targeted IPC interventions and sustained monitoring and sustained supervision.
  • Ensure healthcare workers receive adequate training on IPC, including the proper use of PPE, and that health facilities have appropriate equipment to ensure the safety and protection of their staff, their timely payment of salaries and, as appropriate, hazard pay.
Patients’ referral pathway and access to safe and optimized intensive care.
  • Ensure that suspected cases can be safely transferred to specialized clinical units for their isolation and management in a human and patient-centred approach.
  • Establish specialized treatment centers or units, located close to outbreak epicenter(s), with staff trained and equipped to implement optimized intensive supportive care.
Research and development of medical countermeasures
  • Implement clinical trials to advance the development and use of candidate therapeutics and vaccine, supported by partners.
Border health, travels and mass-gathering events
  • Undertake cross-border screening and screening at main internal roads to ensure that no suspected case is missed and enhance the quality of screening through improved sharing of information with surveillance teams.
  • There should be no international travel of Bundibugyo virus disease contacts or cases, unless the travel is part of an appropriate medical evacuation. To minimize the risk of international spread of Bundibugyo virus disease:
  • Confirmed cases should immediately be isolated and treated in a Bundibugyo virus disease Treatment Centre with no national or international travel until two Bundibugyo virus-specific diagnostic tests conducted at least 48 hours apart are negative;
  • Contacts (which do not include properly protected health workers and laboratory staff who have had no unprotected exposure) should be monitored daily, with restricted national travel and no international travel until 21 days after exposure;
  • Probable and suspect cases should immediately be isolated and their travel should be restricted in accordance with their classification as either a confirmed case or contact.
  • Implement exit screening of all persons at international airports, seaports and major land crossings, for unexplained febrile illness consistent with potential Bundibugyo virus disease. The exit screening should consist of, at a minimum, a questionnaire, a temperature measurement and, if there is a fever, an assessment of the risk that the fever is caused by Bundibugyo virus disease. Any person with an illness consistent with Bundibugyo virus disease should not be allowed to travel unless the travel is part of an appropriate medical evacuation.
  • Consider postponing mass gatherings until BVD transmission is interrupted.
Safe and dignified burials
  • Ensure funerals and burials are conducted by well-trained personnel, with provision made for the presence of the family and cultural practices, and in accordance with national health regulations, to reduce the risk of Bundibugyo virus infection. The cross-border movement of the human remains of deceased suspect, probable or confirmed Bundibugyo virus disease cases should be prohibited unless authorized in accordance with recognized international biosafety provisions.
Operations, supplies and logistics
  • Strong supply pipeline needs to be established to ensure that sufficient medical and laboratory commodities and other critical items, especially personal protective equipment (PPE), are available to those who appropriately need them. WHO advises against any restrictions on travel and/or trade to DRC or Uganda based on available information for the current outbreak.
For countries with land borders adjoining countries with documented Bundibugyo virus disease
  • Unaffected States Parties with land borders adjoining States Parties with documented Bundibugyo virus disease transmission should urgently enhance their preparedness and readiness capacity, including active surveillance across health facilities with active zero reporting, enhancement of community surveillance for clusters of unexplained deaths; establish access to a qualified diagnostic laboratory; ensure that health workers are aware of and trained in appropriate IPC procedures; and establish rapid response teams with the capacity to investigate and manage BVD cases and their contacts.
  • Dedicated coordination mechanisms should be in place at national and subnational level in all Unaffected States Parties with land borders adjoining States Parties with documented cases of Bundibugyo virus disease. States should be prepared to detect, investigate, and manage Bundibugyo virus disease cases; this should include assured access to a qualified diagnostic laboratory for Bundibugyo virus disease, isolation and case management capacity and activation of rapid response teams.
  • Any State Parties newly detecting a suspected or confirmed Bundibugyo virus disease case or contact, or clusters of unexplained deaths should treat this as a health emergency, take immediate steps in the first 24 hours to investigate and stop a potential outbreak by instituting case isolation, case management, establishing a definitive diagnosis, and undertaking contact tracing and monitoring as required.
  • If Bundibugyo virus disease is confirmed to be occurring in the State Party, the full recommendations for State Parties with Bundibugyo virus disease transmission should be implemented, on either a national or subnational level, depending on the epidemiologic and risk context. State Parties should immediately report the confirmation of Bundibugyo virus disease to WHO.
  • Risk communications and community engagement, especially at points of entry, should be increased.
  • At-risk countries should put in place approvals for investigational therapeutics as an immediate priority for preparedness.
For all other countries
  • No country should close its borders or place any restrictions on travel and trade. Such measures are usually implemented out of fear and have no basis in science. They push the movement of people and goods to informal border crossings that are not monitored, thus increasing the chances of the spread of disease. Most critically, these restrictions can also compromise local economies and negatively affect response operations from a security and logistics perspective.
  • National authorities should work with airlines and other transport and tourism industries to ensure that they do not exceed WHO’s advice on international traffic.
  • States Parties should provide travelers to Bundibugyo virus disease affected and at-risk areas with relevant information on risks, measures to minimize those risks, and advice for managing a potential exposure.
  • The general public should be provided with accurate and relevant information on the Bundibugyo virus disease outbreak and measures to reduce the risk of exposure.
  • State Parties should be prepared to facilitate the evacuation and repatriation of nationals (e.g. health workers) who have been exposed to Bundibugyo virus disease.
  • Entry screening at airports or other ports of entry outside the affected region are not considered needed for passengers returning from areas at risk.
https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2026-DON602
 
I missed this media conference. There was a 3 hour notice. On a Sunday....




Media Advisory
Embargoed Until Sunday
May 17, 2026, 3:00 p.m. EDT
Contact: CDC Media Relations


Update on Ebola Outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda


What

CDC will provide an update on its response to an Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Uganda.

Who

CAPT Satish K. Pillai, MD, MPH – CDC Ebola Response Incident Manager

When

Sunday, May 17, 2026, 3:00 p.m. EDT


(call in info...)


Transcript
A transcript will be available following the briefing at CDC’s website: www.cdc.gov/media.​
 
I missed this media conference. There was a 3 hour notice. On a Sunday....




Media Advisory
Embargoed Until Sunday
May 17, 2026, 3:00 p.m. EDT
Contact: CDC Media Relations


Update on Ebola Outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Uganda


What

CDC will provide an update on its response to an Ebola outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Uganda.

Who

CAPT Satish K. Pillai, MD, MPH – CDC Ebola Response Incident Manager

When

Sunday, May 17, 2026, 3:00 p.m. EDT


(call in info...)


Transcript
A transcript will be available following the briefing at CDC’s website: www.cdc.gov/media.​


Apparently Politico was in attendance:

Ebola risk in US remains low amid Congo outbreak, CDC says

Kelly Hooper
Sun, May 17, 2026 at 4:23 PM EDT



The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said Sunday that risk of the Ebola virus to the U.S. population remains low as the World Health Organization has declared a global health emergency amid an outbreak of the disease in central Africa.

“Travelers to the region should avoid contact with sick people, report symptoms immediately and follow our travel health guidance,” Satish Pillai, the CDC’s Ebola response incident manager, said on a call with reporters.

snip

Key context: The CDC declined to confirm on Sunday whether any Americans in the DRC have been exposed to or infected with Ebola.

“CDC headquarters and the CDC country office is actively working with our interagency partners, the embassy, to fully assess the situation and the needs on the ground,” Pillai said. “It is a highly dynamic situation, and at this point, what I would say is we continue to assess, we will continue to keep you posted as we learn more.”

Pillai added that the CDC does not “discuss or comment on individual dispositions.”

What’s next: The agency has activated its emergency response center for this outbreak and is providing in-country support in the DRC and Uganda with surveillance, contact tracing, laboratory testing, infection prevention and control, border health activities and community engagement, Pillai said.

The agency is also mobilizing additional support from its Atlanta headquarters.



https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/ebola-risk-us-remains-low-202326589.html

 
Americans in Congo may have had exposure to Ebola in outbreak, STAT News reports

By Reuters
May 17, 20266:10 PM EDT
Updated 40 mins ago​

May 17 (Reuters) - A number of Americans currently in ​the Democratic Republic of ‌Congo are believed to have had exposure to ​suspected cases in ​the country’s latest Ebola ⁠outbreak, with several ​deemed to have had ​high-risk exposures, STAT News reported on Sunday.
At least one ​of these individuals ​may have developed symptoms, the report ‌said.​…
:tiphat:
https://www.reuters.com/business/he...ola-in-outbreak-stat-news-reports-2026-05-17/
 
image.png


Health Alert: Update U.S. Embassy Kinshasa (May 15, 2026)

By U.S. Embassy Kinshasa

5 MINUTE READ
May 15, 2026

Location: Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC)

Event: On May 15, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued a Level 2 (Practice Enhanced Precautions) Travel Health Notice for Ebola for the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).

Ebola is a rare, severe, and often fatal hemorrhagic fever illness. The virus is transmitted through:
  • Direct contact with infected persons or their blood, bodily fluids.
  • Direct contact (handling or washing) with infected corpses.
  • Contact with objects that have been in contact with infected secretions.
The Travel Advisory for the DRC lists Ituri Province as a Level 4 (Do Not Travel) area of increased risk. The U.S. government is extremely limited in its ability to provide emergency services to U.S. citizens in Ituri province. Do not travel to this area for any reason.

Please see the latest Travel Health Notice from CDC .

Actions to Take:
Assistance:
https://cd.usembassy.gov/health-alert-update-u-s-embassy-kinshasa-may-15-2026/
 
Translation Google

Ebola in Ituri: Minister Samuel Roger Kamba rejects accusations of negligence and defends the responsiveness of the health system

Sunday, May 17, 2026 - 8:05 PM

Was there negligence in the alerts issued in connection with the new resurgence of the Ebola virus disease epidemic in the province of Ituri? This was one of the main questions in Congolese public opinion, especially since the supposed index case of the disease, a nurse who died at the Evangelical Medical Center (CME) of Bunia, dates back to April 24, 2026 in the Rwampara health zone.

The Minister of Public Health, Hygiene, and Social Welfare sought to clarify what many actors in the Congolese socio-political debate have described as negligence on the part of the government. According to this member of the Suminwa government, it is neither a matter of negligence, nor a failure, much less a flaw in the system.

During a press conference held this Saturday, May 16, 2026, he rejected accusations of alleged slowness or failure of the health surveillance system in managing alerts of the new Ebola virus disease epidemic in Ituri.

"You said something that surprises me. You said: 'What went wrong? The epidemic has been here for a month and you didn't react.' I remind you that there was a patient, a nurse, who died in Bunia from an illness that had not yet been reported. I gave the date: April 24," the minister explained, specifying that the body had then been transferred to Mungwalu, where traditional funeral practices had contributed to the spread.

"It was during funeral ceremonies that people mourned, thinking it was a mystical illness, touched the body and increased contact. That's where the cases started to appear," he added during his speech.


The supervising minister indicated that the first official report occurred on May 5th. "This first report was social, via social networks," he specified, while emphasizing that the health teams intervened quickly afterwards.

"Three days later, our teams had already made the official report. The samples were taken," he continued in his statement.


According to him, the initial analyses had not made it possible to identify the expected strain.

"We initially looked for the Zaire strain, but the results were negative," he noted.

The samples were then sent to the National Institute of Biomedical Research (INRB) in Kinshasa for further analysis.

"And it was the day before yesterday that we received confirmation of another strain. So, I don't know why you're saying 'What went wrong?'" he said.


In the same vein, the minister invoked international standards for response.

"There's a rule called '7-1-7': be alerted within seven days, intervene immediately, and make a rapid diagnosis. And that's what was done," stated Minister Samuel Roger Kamba. He further assured that response measures are already underway, including the deployment of logistical and air resources. "Between May 8th and tomorrow, May 17th, aircraft have already been deployed. That represents less than nine days," he indicated, adding that "the system itself is not the problem."

One day before the government's official announcement, Dr. Jean Kaseya, Director General of the Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (Africa CDC), had warned of the high risk of regional spread of the epidemic. In response to this situation, a high-level regional emergency meeting was announced with health authorities from the DRC, Uganda, and South Sudan, as well as several international partners, including the World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF.

According to Congolese doctor Jean Kaseya, head of the African Union's health agency, efforts will focus in particular on strengthening epidemiological surveillance, laboratory capacities, infection control, community engagement and cross-border coordination.

This Ebola virus disease outbreak is occurring in an area marked by serious violence against civilians, attributed in particular to the ADF rebels, who continue to wreak havoc despite joint military operations conducted by the FARDC and Ugandan forces. Added to this is the activity of several local armed groups, including CODECO, the Zaïre group, the CRP, and other militias. This situation further destabilizes the humanitarian context in this part of the DRC and is causing massive population displacements.

This new outbreak in Ituri province comes nearly six months after the announcement, on December 1, 2025, of the end of the 16th Ebola virus disease epidemic in Kasai province. Health authorities had indicated at the time that no new cases had been recorded during the 42 days following the recovery of the last patient on October 19, 2025.

https://actualite.cd/index.php/2026...amba-rejette-les-accusations-de-negligence-et
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ebola in Ituri: "Our surveillance system did not work," says Dr. Muyembe


Sunday, May 17, 2026 - 7:38 PM

Professor Jean-Jacques Muyembe is a world-renowned virologist. A Congolese national, he was part of the team that co-discovered the Ebola virus in 1976 in Yambuku, in what is now Équateur Province. For fifty years, he has managed epidemic after epidemic in the DRC, often in war zones. This Sunday, May 17, as the WHO has just declared the Ebola Bundibugyo outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern, he answers questions from ACTUALITE.CD. He expresses his anger at the delayed detection. He confirms the case in Goma. He calls for calm. And he expresses his confidence in the DRC's ability to overcome this epidemic, as it has done fifteen times before.

Official figures report 246 suspected cases and 80 deaths. Are these figures still provisional?

Yes. These are figures provided by the Ministry of Health. And to tell you that the situation is serious: in just a few weeks, we've had this many deaths. Which means the virus is circulating in the population. That's all we can say.

There are reports of a nurse who died in Bunia, with initial symptoms dating back to April 24th. Why did it take almost six weeks for official confirmation?

We are not very happy because there was a major weakness in the surveillance. Our surveillance system failed. Monitoring an epidemic isn't just the Ministry of Health's responsibility. It's everyone's responsibility. In this region, you have members of parliament and senators who go on vacation and are aware of the situation. They know there are deaths, and nothing is said. It's everyone's irresponsibility.

Secondly, confirmation was delayed because the diagnostic system used locally didn't recognize this virus. It only recognized the Zaire strain, the most common one. That's why the diagnosis was negative. But with the samples we received here at the INRB, we used other techniques and detected it quickly. Of the 13 samples, 8 were positive. So there was a technical delay in the diagnosis and in reporting the outbreak. I don't think this should continue.

You have confirmed a case in Goma involving a woman whose husband died in Bunia. What is your assessment of the transmission chain at this stage?

For the moment, we have simply confirmed this case in Goma. The INRB in Goma, which uses the same techniques as we do here, has confirmed this case. Unfortunately, we don't yet know all of this woman's contacts. Certainly, there must be many contacts. Epidemiologists are currently compiling a list of all these contacts and monitoring them.

The WHO mentioned a confirmed case in Kinshasa, which the INRB immediately denied. Was there a case in Kinshasa?

No. The person presented themselves voluntarily at the INRB. We conducted tests, and they were negative. Pending final confirmation, they were isolated in a clinic in Kinshasa. The tests are negative for the Bundibugyo strain.

How does the Bundibugyo strain differ clinically and epidemiologically from the Zaire strain?

Clinically, there is no difference. Epidemiologically, there is no difference either. The difference lies in pathogenicity. With Bundibugyo, mortality is around 30%, below 50%. Whereas with the Zaire strain, mortality exceeds 80%. The mode of transmission is the same.

There is no approved vaccine or treatment for Bundibugyo. What therapeutic options are being considered?

Of the 17 epidemics we have experienced in the DRC, 15 were brought under control simply by applying public health measures. The first thing is to break the chain of transmission. The disease is transmitted through contact with bodily fluids. If you avoid this contact, you break the chain of transmission and the epidemic stops.

For hospitalized patients, doctors know how to find medications to relieve pain and rehydrate the body. There is no specific drug, but patients are isolated, active surveillance is practiced, contacts are traced, and dignified and safe burials are conducted. This is how all previous epidemics have been controlled.

By the end of this month, we will know which vaccines or molecules are candidates for treating Ebola cases in Bundibugyo. Studies had already begun.

Africa CDC welcomed the strengthening of the laboratory network in the DRC, which increased from 2 to 42. To what extent has this capacity enabled faster detection?

That's precisely what went wrong. The Bunia laboratory should have sent the samples directly to the INRB as soon as the first signs of hemorrhagic fever appeared. Clinically, we were dealing with hemorrhagic fever. But biologically, the tests were negative. So they should have continued their investigation and sent the samples to the national laboratory. Something went wrong there. That's why we ended up in this catastrophic situation.

Ituri is a province under siege with massive population displacements. To what extent does this instability compromise the response?

This isn't the first time. We faced the same problem in 2018-2020. The outbreak was in Beni and Butembo, and that was the real challenge: managing an epidemic in a conflict zone. It's the same problem today. The conflict is hindering the effectiveness of surveillance and response efforts.

Cases have been confirmed in Kampala and Goma. Is the risk of regional spread being underestimated?

Close monitoring is needed on both the Rwandan and South Sudanese sides. The INRB will work with neighboring countries to prevent the spread to at-risk areas.

How can we ensure consistent institutional communication between the various health authorities and international organizations?

When there's an epidemic, rumors always accompany the situation. There will be many people on the ground spreading the word. That's the big problem. The Ministry of Health will get the situation under control as we move forward. There will be a bit of a lull, and the information that comes out will be verifiable scientific information. Regarding the case in Kinshasa: it wasn't a confirmed case, it was simply a suspected case, and it tested negative. We want to give the results directly to the Minister of Health and his team.

The DRC has dealt with 16 Ebola epidemics since 1976. Do you believe the country is sufficiently equipped to contain this 17th epidemic, in the face of a strain for which there is no vaccine or treatment?

Of the 17 outbreaks, 15 were managed without a vaccine or treatment. We did it. And in 2012, we had this outbreak in Isiro with the same Bundibugyo strain. And it was contained. So we shouldn't sow panic because we don't have a vaccine. We have the capacity to manage this outbreak methodically. I think the Congolese people can have confidence: we have experts. They will manage this situation, and the disease will not spread. It's a matter of trust in the science we possess.

Stanis Bujakera Tshiamala

https://actualite.cd/2026/05/17/ebo...surveillance-na-pas-fonctionne-dit-dr-muyembe
 
Back
Top