Re: Can You Get H1N1 More Than Once?
the 20-40% are from this thread:
http://www.flutrackers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=127659
> New York City health officials now believe that while only 10 to 20 percent of New Yorkers
> were reported ill with flu last spring, as many as 20 to 40 percent may have been exposed
> to the disease and developed immunity that has prevented it from spreading.
some health officials ? most health officials ?
Is it all just speculation ?
they could do some serology - and maybe did.
they could have done some more questioning of the people to find
out who had had it - and probably did.
They may well have more information than we.
It sounded a bit as if they had come up with the 20-40% because
they thought that so many were needed to explain the herd immunity
why NYC is spared now.
That would be hard to explain with only 10% being infected,immune.
Remove those 10% and we have a city with 7.5M instead of 8.3M,
a little less densely populated, but why should those remaining
90% be less vulnerable to the virus than some other city
with 7.5M ? Being less densely populated doesn't usually protect cities
from flu.
But we know from seasonal flu that these 10% are indeed
sufficient to provide herd-immunity since seasonal waves
end. They go down when only ~10% of the population are infected.
So, why does herd immunity occur ? I assume it's because the
superspreaders are no longer dangerous because of immunity.
The average number of flu-critical contacts is going down.
That would mean, flu-sufferers are more often superspreaders
than other people
Remove these 10% of superspreaders from a city and they should be safe. (?)
Well, removing immune people also increases the contacts between susceptible
people .
And we have the modelings which apparantly can explain this all.
I'm confused...