• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

California - Marin County Investigating Possible Case of Bird Flu H5N1 - December 6, 2024

Commonground

Senior Moderator
Public Health Status Update 12/6/24

Since March 2024, Marin County Public Health (MCPH) has been monitoring the H5N1 bird flu outbreak. The virus is now widely circulating among wild birds, poultry, and livestock across California. On November 27, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) issued another warning against consuming raw milk products after the bird flu virus was found in retail samples and bulk tank milk at a raw milk processing facility. Today the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) announced the start of a National Milk Testing Strategy. Sporadic human infections with bird flu are expected during an outbreak. Last month, the Alameda County Public Health Department (ACPHD) confirmed a bird flu case with an unknown source of exposure. Last week MCPH began investigating a possible bird flu case in a child and is working with the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to determine how the child may have been exposed.​

https://coronavirus.marinhhs.org/public-health-status-update-12062024
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This sounds like a done deal because they are investigating the source of the infection? I will add to our list as pending.
 
Media [bolding is mine]

Possible H5N1 bird flu case in California child; source of infection unknown
Susanne Rust - Los Angeles Times (TNS) 1 hr ago​


LOS ANGELES — Health officials in Marin County are investigating a possible H5N1 bird flu case in a child.

Officials have been investigating since last week and are working with the California Department of Public Health an the Centers for Disease Control to determine how the child was exposed.

The information was provided in a Dec.6 "health status update" newsletter,and buried at the end of a paragraph about the county and state's monitoring of the virus, raw milk and a note about a new USDA program designed to test milk nationwide.

If confirmed, this would be the second case of an infected child in California.
​-snip-
"It's deeply concerning that another child may have H5N1. We need to know much more about this case, including some hypotheses for how she or he may have contracted the virus," said Jennifer Nuzzo, director of the Pandemic Center at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island. "Given the proximity of this case to the last case of H5N1 diagnosed in a child without known exposure to animals, it may be prudent to conduct a broader investigation, including a serologic study, to see if there is evidence of other infections in the area."
-snip-


Wastewater samples collected by WastewaterScan — an infectious disease monitoring network led by researchers at Stanford and Emory University, with lab testing partner Verily, Alphabet Inc.'s life sciences organization — has shown virus is widely present in the environment, including Marin Co. sites in San Raphael and Novato.

In the two weeks, state health and agriculture officials suspended and recalled infected raw milk that had made its way to grocery store shelves throughout the state.

There have been no known outbreaks associated with that raw milk, and it is unclear if people can get the disease by consuming it in milk.

However, several mammal species have displayed severe illness and death after consuming raw milk including cats and mice.

Mark McAfee, the owner of the infected raw milk farm — Raw Farm LLC — told the Times last week that he believed the milk had gone out to 90,000 customers.

Asked how he determined that number, he said "Our consumers buy every week.... its very reliable. We have 500 stores and based on dollar volume per check-out its our best guess."

The state's health and agriculture departments were unable to confirm that number
.

https://www.swoknews.com/ap/nationa...cle_3aed2fb7-2ac8-5a46-9d1c-3c73ac9eada8.html

 
Media
12/9/2024

Excerpt:

The County's public health officer, Dr. Lisa Santora, informed that the child had tested positive for influenza type A at a hospital.

"Additional local and state testing was unable to confirm if a seasonal flu or avian flu subtypes," Santora added.

The officials have submitted the blood sample of the patient to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for confirmation. They expect to receive the results by the end of the week.

https://www.rttnews.com/3496005/mar...stigate-potential-bird-flu-case-in-child.aspx
 
Source: https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/ot...lu-victim-drank-recalled-raw-milk/ar-AA1vCDrN


LA Times
Authorities probe whether Marin County bird flu victim drank recalled raw milk
Story by Susanne Rust
• 33m • 3 min read​

Public health authorities are seeking to determine if a Marin County child stricken with bird flu could have potentially contracted the illness by drinking infected raw milk that was subject to a recall.

The case was announced on Friday, buried in a Dec. 6 Marin County health newsletter, which provided few details about the case or the county and state's investigation.

"Since announcing multiple recalls of raw milk due to contamination with bird flu, state and local public health experts have received reports of illnesses from 10 individuals who reported drinking raw milk," said Grant Boyken, a spokesman for the state's public health department.

He said that initial county and state public health laboratory testing had not identified any positive bird flu infections in these individuals, but that one Marin County child who tested positive for it had recovered.​..
 
Marin County Public Health

Excerpt:
In November, Marin County Public Health (MCPH) was notified of a suspected case of bird flu. The child presented to a local emergency department with fever and vomiting after drinking raw milk. The child tested positive for Influenza A. MCPH is working with California Department of Public Health (CDPH) and the Center for Disease Control (CDC) on additional testing to confirm if this infection was bird flu or seasonal flu. The child has recovered and no other family members became sick, indicating no person-to-person transmission.​

https://www.marinhhs.org/h5n1-bird-flu
 
Authorities probe whether presumptive bird flu case is connected to raw milk

By Susanne RustStaff Writer
Dec. 10, 2024 Updated 5:39 PM PT​

Public health authorities are seeking to determine if a Marin County child stricken with flu could have potentially contracted the illness by drinking infected raw milk that was subject to a recall.


The presumptive bird flu case was announced on Friday, in a Dec. 6 Marin County health newsletter, which provided few details about the case or the county and state’s investigation.

“Since announcing multiple recalls of raw milk due to contamination with bird flu, state and local public health experts have received reports of illnesses from 10 individuals who reported drinking raw milk,” said Ali Bay, spokeswoman for the state’s public health department.


She said that initial county and state public health laboratory testing had not identified any positive bird flu infections in these individuals, but that one Marin County child who tested positive for Influenza A had recovered.

H5N1 bird flu is classified as an Influenza A virus — a group that also includes human seasonal flu viruses.

Additional testing is being conducted to assess whether the child was infected with bird flu or seasonal flu.


In a press statement released Tuesday evening, the Marin County public health officer, Lisa Santora, said the child in question “experienced fever and vomiting after drinking raw milk.”

She added that the child has recovered, “and no other family members became sick, indicating no person-to person transmission.”

On Dec. 6, the state’s health department issued an alert to healthcare providers advising them to evaluate and test for H5N1 bird flu “in people who develop flu-like symptoms after consuming raw milk.”
https://www.latimes.com/environment...ounty-bird-flu-victim-drank-recalled-raw-milk
 
State of California—Health and Human Services Agency
California Department of Public Health




​​Health Update ​​ ​​​​​​ ​​

[bolding is mine]


TO: Healthcare Providers
Evaluation and Testing for Human Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Infection
12/6/2024​

Key Messages​​​
  • Human avian influenza A(H5N1) cases have been identified in California, including one case in a child with no known exposure to animals. 
  • ​​​Healthcare providers should consider avian influenza A in persons with acute respiratory symptoms and/or conjunctivitis and recent exposure to animals suspected or confirmed to have avian influenza A OR recent consumption of raw dairy products. Of note, all cases among California dairy workers have had conjunctivitis.
  • ​​Providers should immediately report any suspected human avian influenza A infections to their local health departments.
  • Testing of respiratory and conjunctival specimens for avian influenza A is available at some public health laboratories and two commercial laboratories.
  • Antiviral treatment is recommended for patients suspected or confirmed to have avian influenza A infection and antiviral prophylaxis is recommended for their close (e.g., household) contacts.
  • Healthcare providers should follow standard, contact, and airborne precautions​ when caring for patients suspected of having avian influenza A infection. ​
  • ​All human avian influenza A cases in the U.S. have been mild. One case of severe disease has been reported in Canada. ​
​Situational Update

H​​uman Cases

As of December 6, 2024, the California Department of Public Health has received reports of 32 confirmed and 1 probable case of influenza A(H5N1) infection. All but one case has been among workers at dairy farms with infected cows. All infected dairy workers had mild illness with conjunctivitis as a prominent symptom. One case occurred in a child with mild respiratory symptoms and no known animal exposure. Nationally, 58 confirmed cases have been detected; all but two cases were in poultry or dairy workers.

The risk to the general public remains low. However, people with job-related or recreational close and prolonged exposures to infected birds, cows, or other animals are at higher risk of infection.   ​

Animal Cases

As of December 6, 2024, avian influenza A has been detected in over 700 U.S. dairy herds in 15 states since March 2024. In California, 504 dairy herds have been infected since August 2024. Recently, the first raw dairy farm was infected leading to recall of their unpasteurized raw milk products.

Since the start of the outbreak in February 2022, avian influenza A has been detected in 1,264 commercial and backyard poultry flocks in 49 states. In California, 76 infected commercial and 32 backyard flocks have been infected. ​

Recommendations for Healthcare ​Providers

​​Consider Avian Influenza Infection

Healthcare providers should consider the possibility of avian influenza A virus infection in a patient with:
  • Signs and symptoms consistent with acute respiratory tract infection and/or conjunctivitis;* AND
  • A history of exposure in the last 10 days to animals suspected or confirmed to have avian influenza A, or who have had exposure to raw milk. 
​​If you encounter patients who work with infected animals, please encourage them to use ​personal protective equipment (PPE) and suggest they receiveseasonal influenza vaccine during influenza season. 
*If exposure was consumption of raw dairy products, and only gastrointestinal symptoms are present, interim recommendations are to test as below.

Specimen Collection ​and Testing
  • ​Healthcare providers who suspect avian influenza A virus infection should immediately reach out to their local health department (LHD). The LHD can help determine if testing is warranted, recommend appropriate specimens to collect based on symptomatology, and coordinate testing at a public health or commercial laboratory that can perform H5 subtyping (if appropriate).* 
  • Influenza testing at clinical or commercial laboratories can dete​ct influenza A, but hemagglutinin subtyping must be done to detect avian influenza A virus (or rule it out by detecting H3 or H1 influenza A) in an influenza A positive specimen.  
    • ​When concern for detecting avian influenza A infection is high, testing should be sent to a public health laboratory for timely public health response ( e.g., symptomatic farm workers exposed to infected animals or symptomatic persons exposed to a confirmed human case).
      • ​Commercial PCR tests for influenza can be used to rule out influenza A (and therefore H5N1) infection in symptomatic people less likely to be infected with avian influenza A (e.g., symptomatic people with limited animal exposure, or no known exposure to infected animals or humans).​
      • ​​​​Testing at a commercial laboratory offering testing for avian influenza A can also be ordered for low suspicion patients.
  • ​​Specimens should ideally be collected within 24–72 hours of symptom onset and no later than 10 days after symptom onset. ​​​​​
    • ​Respiratory specimens for submission to a public health laboratory*
      • ​Separate oropharyngeal and nasal swabs are preferred (combining both swabs into a single transport media tube is acceptable).
      • Nasopharyngeal swabs are acceptable, but to date have had a lower yield for positive test results in cases than oropharyngeal or nasal swabs. 
    • ​A conjunctival swab should also be collected from anyone experiencing conjunctivitis, and has the highest yield for detection in cases to date.
      • ​​​If both eyes are affected, each eye should be swabbed with a separate swab but both swabs should be placed in a single transport media tube.
      • Conjunctival swabs MUST be paired with oropharyngeal and nasal swab specimens or a nasopharyngeal swab specimen, even if the person does not have respiratory symptoms. 
    • ​If the symptomatic person consumed raw dairy products and has gastrointestinal symptoms (with or without respiratory symptoms), stool should also be collected, if possible, and held for potential testing.
    • Specimens should be collected using swabs with synthetic tips (e.g., polyester or Dacron®) and an aluminum or plastic shaft. 
      • ​Swabs with cotton tips and wooden shafts are NOT recommended. 
      • Specimens collected with swabs made of calcium alginate are NOT acceptable. ​​​​
  • ​​Swabs should be placed in specimen collection vials containing 2–3ml of viral transport media (VTM) or universal transport media (UTM). 
  • ​Specimens should be refrigerated or frozen after collection. Refrigerated specimens should be transported to the public health lab on cold packs. Frozen specimens should be transported on dry ice. 
  • For further information about laboratory testing for influenza A(H5), please contact the laboratory that will be conducting testing as specific requirements for acceptable specimens at each laboratory vary.
  • For further information about laboratory testing for influenza A(H5) at the CDPH state laboratory, please refer to the CDPH Viral and Rickettsial Disease Laboratory (VRDL) website, email questions to VRDL.submittal@cdph.ca.gov, or call the VRDL at 510-307-8585 (M-F, 9am – 5pm Pacific Time, excluding holidays). ​
*Commercial laboratories may have differen​t specimen submission recommendations for H5 subtyping than public health laboratories. ​ ​Treatment
  • ​Antiviral treatment is recommended as soon as possible for patients with suspected or confirmed influenza A(H5N1) virus infection.  Antiviral treatment should not be delayed while waiting for laboratory test results. 
  • The standard treatment dose of oseltamivir is 75 mg twice daily for 5 days for adults. 
    • ​Dosage adjustment is needed for children, infants, neonates and for adult patients with renal impairment.
    • ​Oseltamivir is not recommended for people with end-stage renal disease who are not receiving dialysis. 
    • Pending further data, longer courses of treatment (e.g., 10 days) should be considered for severely ill hospitalized patients with novel influenza A virus infections. For additional information, please see the Emergency Use Instructions (EUI) Fact Sheet for Healthcare Providers.
Chemoprophylaxis
  • ​Chemoprophylaxis dosing for avian influenza A is the same as treatment dosing: 75 mg twice daily for adults for 5 days if there has been a time-limited exposure OR 10 days if exposure is ongoing.
    • ​Dosage adjustment is needed for children, infants, neonates and adult patients with renal impairment.
  • ​​​Prophylaxis is recommended for household contacts of confirmed cases and can be considered in workers to infected or potentially infected cows who have had an unprotected discrete high-risk exposure such as a milk splash to the eye.
    • ​​Consideration for prophylaxis should be based on clinical and public health considerations such as type and duration of exposure, time-course, infection status of animal or human exposure and if person is at increased risk for complications with seasonal in​fluenza​. ​
Healthcare Infection Prevention and ​​Control
  • ​​If a case is suspected, immediately mask the patient and place them in an airborne infection isolation room (AIIR) with the door closed. While in an AIIR, the patient’s mask may be removed.
  • If an AIIR is not available, place the patient in a single-patient room with the door closed and have the patient remain masked.
  • Use personal protective equipment that includes:
    • Respiratory protection (fit-tested N95 respirator or higher level of protection).
    • Eye protection (goggles or face shield).
    • Gown and gloves.
  • ​Use diligent hand hygiene before and after contact with the patient.
  • Limit room entry to essential personnel. Limit transport of patient outside their room.
  • If a non-AIIR room is used, after the patient leaves, the room should not be reused and unprotected individuals should not enter until sufficient time has elapsed for enough air changes to remove potentially infectious particles, per CDC guidance. For example, in a patient-care area with 6 air exchanges per hour, the time to removal of airborne contaminants with 99.9% efficiency is 69 minutes.
For additional infection control recommendations, see CDC Interim Guidance for Infection Control Within Heal​thcare Settings When Caring for Confirmed Cases, Probable Cases, and Cases Under Investigation for Infection with Novel Influenza A Viruses Associated with Severe Disease.

For applicable Cal/OSHA requirements in healthcare settings, please see California’s Aerosol Transmissible Disease standard. 

​Resources

CDPH Bird Flu webpage
continued: https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/OP...r-Human-Avian-Influenza-A-H5N1-Infection.aspx

 
Last edited:
News Release —

Health Officials Warn Against Consuming Raw Milk



Flu A detected in child who became sick after drinking raw milk. No person-to-person spread of the virus has been detected or is suspected; Risk to public remains low.
hhs-rawmilk-news1.png


December 10, 2024
News Release
Health and Human Services

San Rafael, CA – Marin County Public Health (MCPH) strong advises people not to consume any raw milk products. MCPH is reporting a suspected case of bird flu in a child who experienced fever and vomiting after drinking raw milk. The child has recovered, and no other family members became sick, indicating no person-to person transmission.

MCPH is actively investigating this possible case of bird flu linked to raw milk consumption with the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) and the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

On December 6, CDPH issued an alert[External] to health care providers to evaluate and test for human avian flu (H5N1) in people who develop flu-like symptoms after consuming raw milk. Due to widespread transmission of bird flu among wild birds, significant outbreaks among dairy cows, and sporadic human cases.

“Bird flu infections in humans are uncommon but there are ongoing outbreaks in dairy cattle and poultry farms in the United States,” said Dr. Lisa Santora, Marin County’s Public Health Officer, “The risk to the public remains low, as bird flu spread from person to person is rare.”

There have been 32 confirmed cases of bird flu reported in California this year. Most bird flu detections in the U.S. have been in poultry and dairy workers who were exposed to sick animals, but sporadic cases are expected.

Human, animal, and environmental health are connected. This possible case of bird flu linked to raw milk consumption highlights the importance of understanding how diseases can spread from animals to humans, especially through food. Raw milk, which hasn't been pasteurized poses a risk of spreading diseases, including influenza. Exposure to food-borne bacteria and viruses can make anyone sick, but they are especially dangerous for people with weak immune systems, as well as children, older adults, and pregnant women.

Health care providers should ​​​consider avian influenza A (H5N1) in persons with fever, gastrointestinal, respiratory symptoms and/or conjunctivitis with recent consumption of raw milk products or exposure to animals suspected or confirmed to have avian influenza. They should contact MCPH immediately for technical assistance on collecting respiratory specimens (nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs) for testing.

“We thank the teams at Napa-Solano-Yolo-Marin County Public Health Laboratory, CDPH and CDC for their prompt response, support and guidance,” Santora said.
Page last updated on December 10, 2024.


https://www.marincounty.gov/news-releases/health-officials-warn-against-consuming-raw-milk
 
Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/california-child-suspected-bird-flu-raw-milk/


California child who experienced fever and vomiting from raw milk does not have bird flu, CDC testing shows
By Sara Moniuszko
Edited By Stephen Smith
Updated on: December 11, 2024 / 12:47 PM EST / CBS News​

Bird flu was not likely what sickened a California child after drinking raw milk, according to initial tests by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a source close to the investigation told CBS News Wednesday.

Health officials in California's Marin County said Tuesday the child experienced fever and vomiting after drinking the unpasteurized milk and warned others against consuming any raw milk products.

"The child has recovered, and no other family members became sick, indicating no person-to person transmission," Marin County Public Health said in a statement.​..
 
h/t Commonground




Susanne Rust
@susrust


1) Story update coming// Here's why Marin Co and CDPH called the case of the Marin Co child a "presumptive" #H5N1 : Child is a toddler. Child was visiting Marin Co. -- not a resident. Child brought to ER by mom. The child had a "high" fever and had been vomiting for 3 days
12:39 PM · Dec 11, 2024



Reply
Susanne Rust
@susrust
·
18h


2) This is all according to Lisa Santora, Marin Co public health officer. Nasopharyngeal swab was negative for Influenza A. Santora said that it has not been uncommon for #H5N1 positive dairy workers to have negative nasopharyngeal tests.





Susanne Rust
@susrust
·
18h


3) B/c of "large" raw milk consumption by child, co health officials tested orally a day later. That was positive for Influenza A. No circulating human flu in child's home community or Marin Co area where family was visiting. No one else in family tested positive for Influenza A.






Susanne Rust
@susrust
·
18h


4) No one else was symptomatic. Only the child had consumed the milk. Child's mom bought cream top milk, thinking it was organic (kind she usually buys) -- maybe hadn't realized it was raw. It was a Raw Farm product.





Susanne Rust
@susrust
·
18h


5) All of these elements: Severe illness, negative naso, positive oral, no flu circulating in location or family, consumption of bird flu recall milk led health officials to call it a "presumptive" case.




Susanne Rust
@susrust
·
18h


6) CDC is now testing sample. A lab at Quest did not find H5, but had too little virus to make a determination. County, state and federal officials still investigating.
 
Source: https://www.statnews.com/2024/12/12/bird-flu-california-toddler-cdc-no-evidence-virus/


CDC finds no evidence of bird flu virus in California toddler
The agency tested a sample from the sick child after state labs failed to confirm a positive result
By Helen Branswell
Dec. 12, 2024

Senior Writer, Infectious Diseases

Testing of samples taken from a child in California thought to have contracted H5N1 bird flu after drinking raw milk turned up no evidence of influenza viruses, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said Thursday.

A test run on a sample from the child — who went to a Marin County emergency department last week with a fever and vomiting — had been positive there for flu A. The sample was sent to a local laboratory as well as the California Department of Public Health’s lab to see if the virus was one of the seasonal flu viruses, H1N1 and H3N2, or H5N1, which have infected hundreds of dairy herds in the state.​..
 
I have removed this case, which was in the pending status, from our list. No confirming H5N1 test from any official entity is the reason. We require at least one test positive with a 100% confidence level for our list. The case is referenced at the bottom of the list in the notes section. link
 
Back
Top