• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

CA DPH: 80 total deaths (19 new) in California

Re: CA DPH: 80 total deaths (19 new) in California

Here is the number by county:

Alameda - 7
Contra Costa - 5
Los Angeles - 14
Marin - 2
Monterey - 1
Orange - 10
Placer - 1
Riverside - 1
Sacramento - 5
San Bernardino - 1
San Diego - 11
San Francisco - 6
San Mateo - 7
Santa Clara - 2
Santa Cruz - 1
Solano - 2
Sonoma - 3
Stanislaus - 1

Total - 80
 
Re: CA DPH: 80 total deaths (19 new) in California

For comparative purposes, do we know the population of Ca - i.e what is the death rate per 100,000 in this area?
 
Re: CA DPH: 80 total deaths (19 new) in California

California's population is about 35 million, the same as Canada's. I believe California now has considerably more deaths than Canada or the UK (pop. 60 million). And it also has the dubious distinction of having the most number of deaths of any state in the US (NY has 73 at latest count).

And yet, we haven't heard very much about the severity of the epidemic in the state - very little from the state public health authorities and almost zilch from the press. If you were to ask a random person whether the epidemic is more severe in the UK or in California, I bet almost everyone would pick the UK. Most people - including people in the state - seem to think things have been pretty mild so far in California. But we've had many more deaths - and for a smaller population - than the UK.
 
Re: CA DPH: 80 total deaths (19 new) in California

Wow! Pretty startling to see such high numbers, especially when we hear almost nothing about it being here in the Golden State. I did get my letter to the editor of our local paper published on 7/28 (Press Democrat) urging the Sonoma County Health Department to show leadership in communicating clearly and honestly with the public about H1N1. They had announced (after the uproar over the 39-year old Petaluma man's death) that they would no longer announce swine flu deaths at all. It seems to be "don't ask, don't tell" in California, as in many other places.
 
Re: CA DPH: 80 total deaths (19 new) in California

I've never tried to calculate a mortality rate, but if I have done this right, it is 0.24 per 100,000 people in California. Can someone tell me if I have done this right?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top