Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Defective Interfering Virus Protects Elderly Mice from Influenza

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Defective Interfering Virus Protects Elderly Mice from Influenza

    Defective Interfering Virus Protects Elderly Mice from Influenza

    Paul D Scott, Bo Meng, Anthony C Marriott, Andrew J Easton and Nigel J Dimmock

    For all author emails, please log on.

    Virology Journal 2011, 8:212 doi:10.1186/1743-422X-8-212
    Published: 9 May 2011
    Abstract (provisional)
    Background

    We have identified and characterised a defective-interfering (DI) influenza A virus particles containing a highly deleted segment 1 RNA that has broad-spectrum antiviral activity. In young adult mice it exerts protection against several different subtypes of influenza A virus (defined here as homologous or genetically compatible protection) and against a paramyxovirus and an influenza B virus (heterologous or genetically unrelated protection). Homologous protection is mediated by replication competition between the deleted and full-length genomes, and heterologous protection occurs through stimulation of innate immunity, especially interferon type I.
    Methods

    A single dose of the protective DI virus was administered intranasally to elderly mice at -7, -1 and +1 days prior to intranasal challenge with influenza A virus.
    Results

    A single dose of the DI virus given 1 or 7 days protected elderly mice, reducing a severe, sometimes fatal disease to a subclinical or mild infection. In contrast, all members of control groups treated with inactivated DI virus before challenge became extremely ill and most died. Despite the subclinical/mild nature of their infection, protected mice developed solid immunity to a second infectious challenge.
    Conclusions

    The defective interfering virus is effective in preventing severe influenza A in elderly mice and may offer a new approach to protection of the human population.


  • #2
    Re: Defective Interfering Virus Protects Elderly Mice from Influenza

    > highly deleted segment 1 RNA

    why not segment 4

    in theory
    we could make a virus that is fully functional and does replicate
    and thus compete with other (flu) viruses
    but only causes mild disease and maybe doesn't spread
    to other hosts


    or a slowly replicating flu, so slow that immunity is fast
    enough to stop it

    or we just inject it into cells,organs where it can't escape
    but still replicate and causes no damage

    or just connect the blood-stream to a flu cell culture
    outside the body
    viruses presumably won't survive in blood
    would it collect antibody-data and produce B-cell immunity ?
    just speculating,


    the LAIV does it ?
    I'm interested in expert panflu damage estimates
    my current links: http://bit.ly/hFI7H ILI-charts: http://bit.ly/CcRgT

    Comment

    Working...
    X