Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pandemic (H(1) N(1) ) Influenza 2009 and Australian emergency departments: Implications for policy, practice and pandemic preparedness

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pandemic (H(1) N(1) ) Influenza 2009 and Australian emergency departments: Implications for policy, practice and pandemic preparedness

    Emerg Med Australas. 2012 Apr;24(2):159-165. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01519.x. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
    Pandemic (H(1) N(1) ) Influenza 2009 and Australian emergency departments: Implications for policy, practice and pandemic preparedness.
    Fitzgerald G, Aitken P, Shaban RZ, Patrick J, Arbon P, McCarthy S, Clark M, Considine J, Finucane J, Holzhauser K, Fielding E.
    Source

    School of Public Health, Queensland University of Technology Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University - Princess Alexandra Hospital Clinical Partnership School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University Queensland Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital Queensland Health Nursing Practice Development Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane Anton Breinl Centre for Public Health and Tropical Medicine, James Cook University Emergency Department, The Townsville Hospital, Townsville Research Centre for Clinical and Community Practice Innovation, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland School of Nursing and Midwifery, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia Australasian College for Emergency Medicine School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University - Northern Health Clinical Partnership, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
    Abstract

    Objective: To describe the reported impact of Pandemic (H(1) N(1) ) 2009 on EDs, so as to inform future pandemic policy, planning and response management. Methods: This study comprised an issue and theme analysis of publicly accessible literature, data from jurisdictional health departments, and data obtained from two electronic surveys of ED directors and ED staff. The issues identified formed the basis of policy analysis and evaluation. Results: Pandemic (H(1) N(1) ) 2009 had a significant impact on EDs with presentation for patients with 'influenza-like illness' up to three times that of the same time in previous years. Staff reported a range of issues, including poor awareness of pandemic plans, patient and family aggression, chaotic information flow to themselves and the public, heightened stress related to increased workloads and lower levels of staffing due to illness, family care duties and redeployment of staff to flu clinics. Staff identified considerable discomfort associated with prolonged times wearing personal protective equipment. Staff believed that the care of non-flu patients was compromised during the pandemic as a result of overwork, distraction from core business and the difficulties associated with accommodating infectious patients in an environment that was not conducive. Conclusions: This paper describes the breadth of the impact of pandemics on ED operations. It identifies a need to address a range of industrial, management and procedural issues. In particular, there is a need for a single authoritative source of information, the re-engineering of EDs to accommodate infectious patients and organizational changes to enable rapid deployment of alternative sources of care.

    ? 2012 The Authors. EMA ? 2012 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine and Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine.

    PMID:
    22487665
    [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]

    This paper describes the breadth of the impact of pandemics on ED operations. It identifies a need to address a range of industrial, management and procedural issues. In particular, there is a need for a single authoritative source of information, the re-engineering of EDs to accommodate infectious …
Working...
X