Please see previous season here.
Week 42 ending October 19, 2013
Synopsis:
During week 42 (October 13-19, 2013), influenza activity remained low in the United States.
* Viral Surveillance: Of 3,513 specimens tested and reported by U.S. World Health Organization (WHO) and National Respiratory and Enteric Virus Surveillance System (NREVSS) collaborating laboratories during week 42, 135 (3.8%) were positive for influenza.
* Pneumonia and Influenza Mortality: The proportion of deaths attributed to pneumonia and influenza (P&I) was below the epidemic threshold.
* Influenza-Associated Pediatric Deaths: Two influenza-associated pediatric deaths that occurred during the 2012-2013 season were reported.
* Outpatient Illness Surveillance: The proportion of outpatient visits for influenza-like illness (ILI) was 1.2%, below the national baseline of 2.0%. All 10 regions reported ILI below region-specific baseline levels. Two states experienced low ILI activity, 48 states and New York City experienced minimal ILI activity and the District of Columbia had insufficient data.
* Geographic Spread of Influenza: The geographic spread of influenza in Puerto Rico was reported as regional; 3 states reported local influenza activity; Guam, the District of Columbia, and 28 states reported sporadic influenza activity, and the U.S. Virgin Islands and 19 states reported no influenza activity.
U.S. Virologic Surveillance
WHO and NREVSS collaborating laboratories located in all 50 states, Puerto Rico, and Washington D.C. report to CDC the number of respiratory specimens tested for influenza and the number positive by influenza virus type and influenza A virus subtype. The results of tests performed during the current week are summarized in the table below.
Week 42
No. of specimens tested 3,513
No. of positive specimens (%) 135 (3.8%)
Positive specimens by type/subtype
Influenza A 112 (83.0%)
2009 H1N1 15 (13.4%)
H3 4 (3.6%)
Subtyping not performed 93 (83.0%)
Influenza B 23 (17.0%)
Region specific data can be found at http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/fluview/flu...dashboard.html.
Antigenic Characterization
CDC has antigenically characterized three influenza viruses [three 2009 H1N1 viruses] collected by U.S. laboratories since October 1, 2013 by hemagglutination inhibition (HI).
2009 H1N1 [3]: All three 2009 H1N1 viruses tested were characterized as A/California/7/2009-like, the influenza A (H1N1) component of the 2013-2014 Northern Hemisphere influenza vaccine.
*For more information see the section on antigenic characterization in the MMWR ?Update: Influenza Activity ? United States and Worldwide, May 19?September 28, 2013?..
Antiviral Resistance
Testing of 2009 H1N1, influenza A (H3N2), and influenza B virus isolates for resistance to neuraminidase inhibitors (oseltamivir and zanamivir) is performed at CDC using a functional assay. Additional 2009 H1N1 and influenza A (H3N2) clinical samples are tested for mutations of the virus known to confer oseltamivir resistance. The data summarized below combine the results of both testing methods. These samples are routinely obtained for surveillance purposes rather than for diagnostic testing of patients suspected to be infected with antiviral-resistant virus.
High levels of resistance to the adamantanes (amantadine and rimantadine) persist among 2009 influenza A (H1N1) and A (H3N2) viruses (the adamantanes are not effective against influenza B viruses). As a result, data from adamantane resistance testing are not presented below.
Oseltamivir Zanamivir
2009 H1N1 5* 0 (0.0) 1 0 (0.0) (no resistance found in 6 tests)
The majority of currently circulating influenza viruses are susceptible to the neuraminidase inhibitor antiviral medications oseltamivir and zanamivir; however, rare sporadic cases of oseltamivir-resistant 2009 H1N1 and A (H3N2) viruses have been detected worldwide. Antiviral treatment with oseltamivir or zanamivir is recommended as early as possible for patients with confirmed or suspected influenza who have severe, complicated, or progressive illness; who require hospitalization; or who are at greater risk for serious influenza-related complications. Additional information on recommendations for treatment and chemoprophylaxis of influenza virus infection with antiviral agents is available at http://www.cdc.gov/flu/antivirals/index.htm.
Pneumonia and Influenza (P&I) Mortality Surveillance
During week 42, 5.8% of all deaths reported through the 122-Cities Mortality Reporting System were due to P&I. This percentage was below the epidemic threshold of 6.2% for week 42.
Influenza-Associated Pediatric Mortality
Two influenza-associated pediatric deaths that occurred during the 2012-2013 season were reported to CDC during week 42; both were associated with an influenza B virus. These deaths bring the total number of reported pediatric deaths for that season to 167. No influenza-associated pediatric deaths for the 2013-2014 season have been reported to CDC.
Additional data can be found at http://gis.cdc.gov/GRASP/Fluview/PedFluDeath.html
Influenza-Associated Hospitalizations
The Influenza Hospitalization Surveillance Network (FluSurv-NET) conducts all age population-based surveillance for laboratory-confirmed influenza-related hospitalizations in select counties in the Emerging Infections Program (EIP) states and Influenza Hospitalization Surveillance Project (IHSP) states. FluSurv-NET estimated hospitalization rates will be updated weekly starting later this season. Additional FluSurv-NET data can be found at: http://gis.cdc.gov/GRASP/Fluview/FluHospRates.html and http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/fluview/FluHospChars.html.
Outpatient Illness Surveillance
Nationwide during week 42, 1.2% of patient visits reported through the U.S. Outpatient Influenza-like Illness Surveillance Network (ILINet) were due to influenza-like illness (ILI). This percentage is below the national baseline of 2.0%. (ILI is defined as fever (temperature of 100?F [37.8?C] or greater) and cough and/or sore throat.)
Region specific data is available at http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/fluview/flu...dashboard.html.
On a regional level, the percentage of outpatient visits for ILI ranged from 0.4% to 2.6% during week 42. All 10 regions reported a proportion of outpatient visits for ILI below their region-specific baseline levels.
ILINet Activity Indicator Map
Data collected in ILINet are used to produce a measure of ILI activity* by state. Activity levels are based on the percent of outpatient visits in a state due to ILI and are compared to the average percent of ILI visits that occur during weeks with little or no influenza virus circulation. Activity levels range from minimal, which would correspond to ILI activity from outpatient clinics being below the average, to intense, which would correspond to ILI activity from outpatient clinics being much higher than average.
During week 42, the following ILI activity levels were experienced:
Two states experienced low ILI activity (Texas and Mississippi).
Forty-eight states and New York City experienced minimal ILI activity (Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming).
Data were insufficient to calculate an ILI activity level from the District of Columbia.
Geographic Spread of Influenza as Assessed by State and Territorial Epidemiologists
The influenza activity reported by state and territorial epidemiologists indicates geographic spread of influenza viruses, but does not measure the severity of influenza activity.
During week 42, the following influenza activity was reported:
* Regional influenza activity was reported by Puerto Rico.
* Local influenza activity was reported by three states (Alabama, Mississippi, and South Carolina).
* Sporadic influenza activity was reported by Guam, the District of Columbia, and 28 states (Alaska, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming).
* No influenza activity was reported by the U.S. Virgin Islands and 19 states (Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, and West Virginia).
Additional National and International Influenza Surveillance Information
FluView Interactive: This season, FluView includes enhanced web-based interactive applications that can provide dynamic visuals of the influenza data collected and analyzed by CDC. These FluView Interactive applications allow people to create customized, visual interpretations of influenza data, as well as comparisons across flu seasons, regions, age groups and a variety of other demographics. To access these tools visit http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/fluviewinteractive.htm.
Week 42 ending October 19, 2013
Synopsis:
During week 42 (October 13-19, 2013), influenza activity remained low in the United States.
* Viral Surveillance: Of 3,513 specimens tested and reported by U.S. World Health Organization (WHO) and National Respiratory and Enteric Virus Surveillance System (NREVSS) collaborating laboratories during week 42, 135 (3.8%) were positive for influenza.
* Pneumonia and Influenza Mortality: The proportion of deaths attributed to pneumonia and influenza (P&I) was below the epidemic threshold.
* Influenza-Associated Pediatric Deaths: Two influenza-associated pediatric deaths that occurred during the 2012-2013 season were reported.
* Outpatient Illness Surveillance: The proportion of outpatient visits for influenza-like illness (ILI) was 1.2%, below the national baseline of 2.0%. All 10 regions reported ILI below region-specific baseline levels. Two states experienced low ILI activity, 48 states and New York City experienced minimal ILI activity and the District of Columbia had insufficient data.
* Geographic Spread of Influenza: The geographic spread of influenza in Puerto Rico was reported as regional; 3 states reported local influenza activity; Guam, the District of Columbia, and 28 states reported sporadic influenza activity, and the U.S. Virgin Islands and 19 states reported no influenza activity.
U.S. Virologic Surveillance
WHO and NREVSS collaborating laboratories located in all 50 states, Puerto Rico, and Washington D.C. report to CDC the number of respiratory specimens tested for influenza and the number positive by influenza virus type and influenza A virus subtype. The results of tests performed during the current week are summarized in the table below.
Week 42
No. of specimens tested 3,513
No. of positive specimens (%) 135 (3.8%)
Positive specimens by type/subtype
Influenza A 112 (83.0%)
2009 H1N1 15 (13.4%)
H3 4 (3.6%)
Subtyping not performed 93 (83.0%)
Influenza B 23 (17.0%)
Region specific data can be found at http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/fluview/flu...dashboard.html.
Antigenic Characterization
CDC has antigenically characterized three influenza viruses [three 2009 H1N1 viruses] collected by U.S. laboratories since October 1, 2013 by hemagglutination inhibition (HI).
2009 H1N1 [3]: All three 2009 H1N1 viruses tested were characterized as A/California/7/2009-like, the influenza A (H1N1) component of the 2013-2014 Northern Hemisphere influenza vaccine.
*For more information see the section on antigenic characterization in the MMWR ?Update: Influenza Activity ? United States and Worldwide, May 19?September 28, 2013?..
Antiviral Resistance
Testing of 2009 H1N1, influenza A (H3N2), and influenza B virus isolates for resistance to neuraminidase inhibitors (oseltamivir and zanamivir) is performed at CDC using a functional assay. Additional 2009 H1N1 and influenza A (H3N2) clinical samples are tested for mutations of the virus known to confer oseltamivir resistance. The data summarized below combine the results of both testing methods. These samples are routinely obtained for surveillance purposes rather than for diagnostic testing of patients suspected to be infected with antiviral-resistant virus.
High levels of resistance to the adamantanes (amantadine and rimantadine) persist among 2009 influenza A (H1N1) and A (H3N2) viruses (the adamantanes are not effective against influenza B viruses). As a result, data from adamantane resistance testing are not presented below.
Oseltamivir Zanamivir
2009 H1N1 5* 0 (0.0) 1 0 (0.0) (no resistance found in 6 tests)
The majority of currently circulating influenza viruses are susceptible to the neuraminidase inhibitor antiviral medications oseltamivir and zanamivir; however, rare sporadic cases of oseltamivir-resistant 2009 H1N1 and A (H3N2) viruses have been detected worldwide. Antiviral treatment with oseltamivir or zanamivir is recommended as early as possible for patients with confirmed or suspected influenza who have severe, complicated, or progressive illness; who require hospitalization; or who are at greater risk for serious influenza-related complications. Additional information on recommendations for treatment and chemoprophylaxis of influenza virus infection with antiviral agents is available at http://www.cdc.gov/flu/antivirals/index.htm.
Pneumonia and Influenza (P&I) Mortality Surveillance
During week 42, 5.8% of all deaths reported through the 122-Cities Mortality Reporting System were due to P&I. This percentage was below the epidemic threshold of 6.2% for week 42.
Influenza-Associated Pediatric Mortality
Two influenza-associated pediatric deaths that occurred during the 2012-2013 season were reported to CDC during week 42; both were associated with an influenza B virus. These deaths bring the total number of reported pediatric deaths for that season to 167. No influenza-associated pediatric deaths for the 2013-2014 season have been reported to CDC.
Additional data can be found at http://gis.cdc.gov/GRASP/Fluview/PedFluDeath.html
Influenza-Associated Hospitalizations
The Influenza Hospitalization Surveillance Network (FluSurv-NET) conducts all age population-based surveillance for laboratory-confirmed influenza-related hospitalizations in select counties in the Emerging Infections Program (EIP) states and Influenza Hospitalization Surveillance Project (IHSP) states. FluSurv-NET estimated hospitalization rates will be updated weekly starting later this season. Additional FluSurv-NET data can be found at: http://gis.cdc.gov/GRASP/Fluview/FluHospRates.html and http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/fluview/FluHospChars.html.
Outpatient Illness Surveillance
Nationwide during week 42, 1.2% of patient visits reported through the U.S. Outpatient Influenza-like Illness Surveillance Network (ILINet) were due to influenza-like illness (ILI). This percentage is below the national baseline of 2.0%. (ILI is defined as fever (temperature of 100?F [37.8?C] or greater) and cough and/or sore throat.)
Region specific data is available at http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/fluview/flu...dashboard.html.
On a regional level, the percentage of outpatient visits for ILI ranged from 0.4% to 2.6% during week 42. All 10 regions reported a proportion of outpatient visits for ILI below their region-specific baseline levels.
ILINet Activity Indicator Map
Data collected in ILINet are used to produce a measure of ILI activity* by state. Activity levels are based on the percent of outpatient visits in a state due to ILI and are compared to the average percent of ILI visits that occur during weeks with little or no influenza virus circulation. Activity levels range from minimal, which would correspond to ILI activity from outpatient clinics being below the average, to intense, which would correspond to ILI activity from outpatient clinics being much higher than average.
During week 42, the following ILI activity levels were experienced:
Two states experienced low ILI activity (Texas and Mississippi).
Forty-eight states and New York City experienced minimal ILI activity (Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming).
Data were insufficient to calculate an ILI activity level from the District of Columbia.
Geographic Spread of Influenza as Assessed by State and Territorial Epidemiologists
The influenza activity reported by state and territorial epidemiologists indicates geographic spread of influenza viruses, but does not measure the severity of influenza activity.
During week 42, the following influenza activity was reported:
* Regional influenza activity was reported by Puerto Rico.
* Local influenza activity was reported by three states (Alabama, Mississippi, and South Carolina).
* Sporadic influenza activity was reported by Guam, the District of Columbia, and 28 states (Alaska, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin, and Wyoming).
* No influenza activity was reported by the U.S. Virgin Islands and 19 states (Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, and West Virginia).
Additional National and International Influenza Surveillance Information
FluView Interactive: This season, FluView includes enhanced web-based interactive applications that can provide dynamic visuals of the influenza data collected and analyzed by CDC. These FluView Interactive applications allow people to create customized, visual interpretations of influenza data, as well as comparisons across flu seasons, regions, age groups and a variety of other demographics. To access these tools visit http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/fluviewinteractive.htm.
Comment