More Than Fact and Fiction: Cultural Memory and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study (The Hastings Center, abstract, edited)
[Source: The Hastings Center, full PDF Document (LINK). Abstract, edited.]
More Than Fact and Fiction: Cultural Memory and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study
Author(s): Susan M. Reverby
Source: The Hastings Center Report, Vol. 31, No. 5 (Sep. - Oct., 2001), pp. 22-28
Published by: The Hastings Center
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3527701
Accessed: 06/10/2010 15:41
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available athttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp.
JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPubl...rCode=hastings.
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
The Hastings Center is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Hastings Center Report.
More than Fact and Fiction Cultural Memory and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study
by SUSAN M. REVERBY
The Tuskegee Syphilis Study is surrounded by illuminating misconceptions-myths that cannot be blithely dismissed because they actually provide some insight into the significance of the study. One of those is that the men were deliberately infected with syphilis; another is that they obtained no treatment for the disease. Some other errors are alleged in two recent articles about the study, but these articles themselves create their own fictions.
-
------
[Source: The Hastings Center, full PDF Document (LINK). Abstract, edited.]
More Than Fact and Fiction: Cultural Memory and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study
Author(s): Susan M. Reverby
Source: The Hastings Center Report, Vol. 31, No. 5 (Sep. - Oct., 2001), pp. 22-28
Published by: The Hastings Center
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3527701
Accessed: 06/10/2010 15:41
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available athttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp.
JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPubl...rCode=hastings.
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
The Hastings Center is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Hastings Center Report.
More than Fact and Fiction Cultural Memory and the Tuskegee Syphilis Study
by SUSAN M. REVERBY
The Tuskegee Syphilis Study is surrounded by illuminating misconceptions-myths that cannot be blithely dismissed because they actually provide some insight into the significance of the study. One of those is that the men were deliberately infected with syphilis; another is that they obtained no treatment for the disease. Some other errors are alleged in two recent articles about the study, but these articles themselves create their own fictions.
-
------