Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Defra - Suffolk report

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Defra - Suffolk report

    Defra publishes final epidemiology report into the Suffolk avian flu outbreak<!-- #EndEditable --><!--End of title--><!--Central Content Area text--><!-- #BeginEditable "body" -->
    Defra has published the final epidemiology report into the outbreak of H5N1 avian influenza in Suffolk, confirmed in February.
    The report sets out the findings of the National Emergency Epidemiology Group who have been investigating the outbreak in close consultation with the European Commission and the Hungarian authorities.
    The final report is a detailed analysis of all possible ways the virus could have arrived in Holton, Suffolk.

    No specific proven source has been found.

    The report concludes that the most plausible explanation is that infection was introduced to Britain via the importation of turkey meat from Hungary.

    Such meat could have originated from a sub-clinically infected turkey flock in Hungary, which had been infected from the wild bird source that had also infected the two goose farms in Hungary.
    The investigation has found no evidence of undisclosed infection in Hungary, and the possibility of infection going undetected in turkeys is considered to be a rare event.
    Chief Veterinary Officer Debby Reynolds said:
    "The epidemiology investigation is an important part of increasing our understanding of avian influenza. Most potential routes of infection are controlled through current procedures. However, the outbreak in Suffolk appears to be the outcome of a series of normally low probability events and circumstances which cumulatively led to the introduction of disease.
    "This report illustrates the importance of effective biosecurity for all food business operators, as there is a continuous low level risk of introduction of avian influenza to the UK. There are always lessons to be learnt after any outbreak and that process is underway. We will be working with the industry leaders and delivery agents on this and in particular examining all areas of biosecurity. A full report will be produced and published.?
    Defra has also confirmed that Bernard Matthews will receive reimbursement of ?589,356.89 for the clinically healthy birds compulsorily killed to prevent disease spread, as required by the Animal Health Act 1981. The rules requiring payment for property destroyed are for disease prevention purposes. They act as an incentive to report disease early. Early reporting is essential to preventing disease spread, which would result in a far higher cost to the taxpayer.
    Defra is currently working with industry on proposals for legislation to establish an animal disease levy which would create an appropriate balance between what the taxpayer and industry are responsible for in relation to animal health and disease outbreaks.
    Minister for animal health Ben Bradshaw said:
    "I would like to thank all those who have worked so hard to provide such a comprehensive report. I would also like to thank the Hungarian authorities for their co-operation and all of those who did such a brilliant job of containing and eradicating the outbreak in Suffolk.
    "Although we cannot be sure how the outbreak happened, this episode reflects the need for constant vigilance, high levels of biosecurity and robust and well developed contingency planning in dealing with animal disease outbreaks.?
    Further information

    See the full epidemiological report.
    A lessons learned report will follow later in the year.
    The Food Standards Agency (FSA) announced on 2 April 2007 that, following a thorough investigation, there was insufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction. See more on the FSA investigation.
    For background and general information on avian flu, see Defra's avian flu pages.
    <!-- #EndEditable --><!--End of Central Content editable text area --><!--Date Modified and Published--><!-- #BeginEditable "PubDate" -->Page published: 19 April 2007<!-- #EndEditable --> <!--End Date-->

  • #2
    Re: Defra - Suffolk report

    This should get things rockin' around here.


    UK bird 'flu outbreak: wild birds exonerated

    19-04-2007

    <!--Start section image loop--><!--End section image loop-->The publication by Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) of the final epidemiology report into the Avian Influenza outbreak in Suffolk confirmed that the probable cause of infection was through imported meat products from Hungary.

    The RSPB (BirdLife in the UK) is disappointed that the Bernard Matthews Company has used this report to call for further monitoring of wild birds, which have been exonerated as a vector in this outbreak.

    In making such a call, the company opens the question of who should pay for even the current surveillance measures. The RSPB, along with other conservation charities, have been undertaking wild bird surveillance since the autumn of 2005.

    "The cost to the RSPB alone has been &#163;170,000 ($340,000) . The company stands to receive almost &#163;600,000 ($1.2 million) in compensation while conservation charities shoulder the burden of surveillance with no cost to the poultry industry or DEFRA," said Dr. Mark Avery, the RSPB’s Director of Conservation.

    <!-End section content--><!--Start section image loop--><!--End section image loop-->"Calling for more work without acknowledging their readiness to contribute to the costs of a scheme designed to protect their industry reveals a worrying state of denial within the industry." —Dr. Mark Avery, Director of Conservation, RSPB.

    Last month a comprehensive critical review of recent scientific literature on the spread of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N, published in the British Ornithologists Union journal Ibis, concluded that poultry trade, rather than bird migration, is the main mechanism of global dispersal of the virus.

    Comment


    • #3
      &quot;Bird Flu&quot; becomes a political football...........again

      London, April 19, IRNA
      UK Report-Bird Flu Case

      The opposition Conservative Party said Thursday it was shocked at the failure by the government to identify the source of the outbreak of the fatal H5N1 strain of bird flu at a leading turkey farm in Suffolk, eastern England in February.
      "The Government has once again failed to establish the cause of the outbreak of a serious animal disease," shadow environment secretary Peter Ainsworth, referring to a similar case of the foot and mouth epidemic among cattle in 2001.
      "The fact that the Government cannot ascertain precisely how bird flu got to Suffolk must surely be a case for looking again at the adequacy of existing regulations dealing with imports of poultry meat," Ainsworth said.
      His criticism comes after the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs concluded in its final epidemiology report that there was no specific proven source for the outbreak at the farm that led to the slaughter of more than 160,000 poultry.
      Other reports suggested that the most likely explanation was that the infection came from the farm's importation of turkey meat from Hungary, where there was also an outbreak.
      Ainsworth said that the conclusion means that no blame will be proportioned, and yet the famed owned by Bernard Matthews will receive compensation of Pnds 600,000 (Dlrs 1.2 million) for healthy birds slaughtered at the outbreak site.
      "Bearing in mind that there must have been a serious failure of bio security at the Bernard Matthews plant, many people will be absolutely astonished that no one will be held responsible for the outbreak," he said.
      A further report on the lessons learned from the outbreak is due to be released later this year, but following an investigation, the Food Standards Agency has already said there is insufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of a conviction.

      Comment

      Working...
      X