Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Environmental Concerns US Region III W. Virginia

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Environmental Concerns US Region III W. Virginia

    In fact, her entire family tries to avoid any contact with the water. Her youngest son has scabs on his arms, legs and chest where the bathwater ? polluted with lead, nickel and other heavy metals ? caused painful rashes. Many of his brother?s teeth were capped to replace enamel that was eaten away.

    Neighbors apply special lotions after showering because their skin burns. Tests show that their tap water contains arsenic, barium, lead, manganese and other chemicals at concentrations federal regulators say could contribute to cancer and damage the kidneys and nervous system.

    ?How can we get digital cable and Internet in our homes, but not clean water?? said Mrs. Hall-Massey, a senior accountant at one of the state?s largest banks.

    She and her husband, Charles, do not live in some remote corner of Appalachia. Charleston, the state capital, is less than 17 miles from her home.

    ?How is this still happening today?? she asked.

    When Mrs. Hall-Massey and 264 neighbors sued nine nearby coal companies, accusing them of putting dangerous waste into local water supplies, their lawyer did not have to look far for evidence. As required by state law, some of the companies had disclosed in reports to regulators that they were pumping into the ground illegal concentrations of chemicals ? the same pollutants that flowed from residents? taps.

    But state regulators never fined or punished those companies for breaking those pollution laws.

    This pattern is not limited to West Virginia. Almost four decades ago, Congress passed the Clean Water Act to force polluters to disclose the toxins they dump into waterways and to give regulators the power to fine or jail offenders. States have passed pollution statutes of their own. But in recent years, violations of the Clean Water Act have risen steadily across the nation, an extensive review of water pollution records by The New York Times found.

    In the last five years alone, chemical factories, manufacturing plants and other workplaces have violated water pollution laws more than half a million times. The violations range from failing to report emissions to dumping toxins at concentrations regulators say might contribute to cancer, birth defects and other illnesses.

    However, the vast majority of those polluters have escaped punishment. State officials have repeatedly ignored obvious illegal dumping, and the Environmental Protection Agency, which can prosecute polluters when states fail to act, has often declined to intervene.

    Because it is difficult to determine what causes diseases like cancer, it is impossible to know how many illnesses are the result of water pollution, or contaminants? role in the health problems of specific individuals.

    But concerns over these toxins are great enough that Congress and the E.P.A. regulate more than 100 pollutants through the Clean Water Act and strictly limit 91 chemicals or contaminants in tap water through the Safe Drinking Water Act.

    ... State regulators say they are doing their best with insufficient resources.

    The Times obtained hundreds of thousands of water pollution records through Freedom of Information Act requests to every state and the E.P.A., and compiled a national database of water pollution violations that is more comprehensive than those maintained by states or the E.P.A. (For an interactive version, which can show violations in any community, visit www.nytimes.com/toxicwaters.)

    In addition, The Times interviewed more than 250 state and federal regulators, water-system managers, environmental advocates and scientists.

    That research shows that an estimated one in 10 Americans have been exposed to drinking water that contains dangerous chemicals or fails to meet a federal health benchmark in other ways....

    Because most of today?s water pollution has no scent or taste, many people who consume dangerous chemicals do not realize it, even after they become sick, researchers say.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/13/us/13water.html?_r=1
    "The only security we have is our ability to adapt."

  • #2
    Re: Environmental Concerns US Region III

    The mountains surrounding the home of Mrs. Hall-Massey?s family and West Virginia?s nearby capital have long been mined for coal. And for years, the area enjoyed clean well water....In the eight miles surrounding Mrs. Hall-Massey?s home, coal companies have injected more than 1.9 billion gallons of coal slurry and sludge into the ground since 2004, according to a review of thousands of state records. Millions more gallons have been dumped into lagoons.

    These underground injections have contained chemicals at concentrations that pose serious health risks, and thousands of injections have violated state regulations and the Safe Drinking Water Act, according to reports sent to the state by companies themselves.

    For instance, three coal companies ? Loadout, Remington Coal and Pine Ridge, a subsidiary of Peabody Energy, one of the largest coal companies in the world ? reported to state officials that 93 percent of the waste they injected near this community had illegal concentrations of chemicals including arsenic, lead, chromium, beryllium or nickel. Sometimes those concentrations exceeded legal limits by as much as 1,000 percent. Those chemicals have been shown to contribute to cancer, organ failures and other diseases.

    But those companies were never fined or punished for those illegal injections, according to state records. They were never even warned that their activities had been noticed. ....
    http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/13/us...ewanted=4&_r=1 snipped
    "The only security we have is our ability to adapt."

    Comment

    Working...
    X