• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Why Did Masks Stop Working in Japan and South Korea?

Emily

Editor, Senior Moderator
https://brownstone.org/articles/why-did-masks-stop-working-in-japan-and-south-korea/
Why Did Masks Stop Working in Japan and South Korea?


By Ian Miller February 15, 2022
In some ways Japan and South Korea might be at least partially to blame for the multiyear long obsession with masking in most of the Western world.

Many governments, especially in the United States, appeared to believe that the early “success” of countries on the Asian continent was due to a widespread cultural acceptance of masking.

That misguided assumption helped direct public health agencies, politicians, school boards and media outlets to shred dozens of high quality pre-Covid studies on masking and forcefully enact and enforce measures that were guaranteed to fail.

Once committed, they had no choice but to ignore the obvious global failure of masks and mask mandates and continue their disproven assertions that masks could end the pandemic in a matter of weeks or reduce infections dramatically.

We’ve since witnessed the anti-science crowd endlessly promoting masking and interventions, with the predictably disastrous results in the Western countries being waved off as a function of poor compliance.

“The reason it’s not working is because people aren’t complying with the mandates,” they’d say, contrary to overwhelmingly consistent survey data that measured mask usage in the 90-98% range across most of the United States and Europe.

To excuse their failure, anti-data activists would point to the Asian countries as “proof” that if we all just masked a little harder, we could bring Covid under control immediately...
 
Masks do work as a prevention tool but they are not 100%. Nothing is 100%. Soiled masks, improper fit, low quality masks, minimal use, can make them ineffective.

All I know is that 2 of the people in my observation group link, a hospital nurse and a school employee have worn at least an N95 - plus taken additional prevention measures - and they have not contracted COVID-19. They are very fastidious about mask wearing.

The people in my observation who have contracted COVID-19 are occasional mask users. They wear them only when required. And they are low quality masks. They also frequented indoor dining and other indoor group activities. So.....

I am not going to argue about masks. If people don't want to wear them. Don't.
 
I think the author of this article missed the boat, but so did our public health leaders for a long, long time. My opinion is that the N-95 protects the wearer significantly. Likely they would be protected better if everyone in the airspace had one, or at least a KN-95. Those at risk should have been allowed to wear an N-95 with a one way valve to be more comfortable. If others didn't like that, then they could wear their own mask.

The sight of the valve might have inspired lower risk people to mask in tighter quarters voluntarily. Having people all sealed up gave a sense of safety to people who didn't want to wear masks. When my husband wore an N-95 with the one way valve on planes during the swine flu pandemic, people were afraid of him.
 
I am not sure a one way valve is a good idea in a pandemic. It makes perfect sense for a HCW or researcher working with something to protect them, as it makes breathing easier, but if the wearer is as likely to be the source of danger as those around them it does not contain exhaled droplets to the same extent.
 
Back
Top Bottom