• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

WHO/UN Press Conference Link (transcript to follow)

Ray

Well-known member
"Response coordinated and run by governments. This disease can't be stopped w/o full engagement of communities. Affected countries have incident management, operations center but some have limited sources. Manage crisis in real-time. UNMEER goes in to strengthen system/process."

"CFR for this disease outbreak is 70%. You can't divide the WHO numbers to see CFR, that is not way CFR derived."

http://terrance.who.int/mediacentre/presser/WHO-RUSH_Ebola_outbreak_presser_14OCT2014.mp3?ua=1
 
Re: WHO/UN Press Conference Link (transcript to follow)

http://who.int/mediacentre/multimedia/ebola_briefing/en/

mp3:
http://terrance.who.int/mediacentre/presser/WHO-RUSH_Ebola_outbreak_presser_14OCT2014.mp3?ua=1
the pdf transcript is now available :
http://who.int/entity/mediacentre/multimedia/vpc-14-october-2014.pdf?ua=1


Chan speech :
http://who.int/dg/speeches/2014/regional-committee-western-pacific/en/

WHO Director-General’s speech to the Regional Committee for the Western Pacific
Dr Margaret Chan
Director-General of the World Health Organization
(delivered in her absence by Ian Smith, Executive Director of the Director-General's Office)
Keynote address to the Regional Committee for the Western Pacific, Sixty-fifth session
Manila, Philippines
13 October 2014
Mr Chairman, Excellencies, honourable ministers, distinguished delegates, Dr Shin, ladies and gentlemen,
The Director-General sends you her best wishes for a productive session. She is fully occupied with
coordinating the international response to what is unquestionably the most severe acute public health
emergency in modern times.

## this is just Ian Smith's opinion or also Chan's ? What about AIDS

I am delivering her messages to you, in the words she wanted to use.
I begin here.
These days, people from WHO are expected to say something about the Ebola outbreak that is ravaging
parts of West Africa. I will do so as well.
In my long career in public health, which includes managing the H5N1 and SARS outbreaks in Hong Kong,
and managing the 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic at WHO, I have never before seen a health event attract
such a high level of international media coverage, day after day after day. I have never seen a health event
strike such fear and terror, well beyond the affected countries.

## bird flu ?!?

I have never seen a health event threaten the very survival of societies and governments in already very poor
countries. I have never seen an infectious disease contribute so strongly to potential state failure.
All of this was confirmed on 18 September when the UN Security Council convened an unprecedented
emergency session to address what has moved from a public health crisis to threaten international peace
and security.
I will not give you the latest figures for cases and deaths, as the number of new cases is now rising
exponentially in the three hardest-hit countries, Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone.

## this is not what the figures given by WHO on the WHO-website show

But I will use the outbreak to show how some messages, some key arguments that WHO has been making
for decades, are now falling on receptive ears.
First, the outbreak spotlights the dangers of the world’s growing social and economic inequalities. The rich
get the best care. The poor are left to die.

## but is this rich-poor inequality growing ? I think the gap is slowly closing over time, as life expectancy
## in poor countries increases more than in rich countries

Second, rumours and panic are spreading faster than the virus. And this costs money.
Ebola sparks nearly universal fear. Fear vastly amplifies social disruption and economic losses well beyond
the outbreak zones.
The World Bank estimates that 90% of economic losses during any [##some ?] outbreak arise from the uncoordinated
and irrational efforts of the public to avoid infection.
Third, when a deadly and dreaded virus hits the destitute and spirals out of control, the whole world is put at
risk.
Our 21st century societies are interconnected, interdependent, and electronically wired together as never
before.
Fourth, decades of neglect of fundamental health systems and services mean that a shock, like an extreme
weather event in a changing climate, armed conflict, or a disease run wild, can bring a fragile country to its
knees.
In the simplest terms, this outbreak shows how one of the deadliest pathogens on earth can exploit any
weakness in the health infrastructure, be it inadequate numbers of health care staff or the virtual absence of
isolation wards and intensive care facilities throughout much of sub-Saharan Africa.
You cannot build these systems up during a crisis. Instead, they collapse.

### let's see. We are trying it now ...

A dysfunctional health system means greatly reduced population resilience to the range of shocks that our
world is delivering, with ever greater frequency and force.
We know that higher numbers of deaths from other causes are occurring, whether from malaria and other
infectious diseases, or limited capacity for safe childbirth.
Here is one of the few things WHO is glad to see.
When presidents and prime ministers in non-affected countries make statements about Ebola, they rightly
attribute the outbreak’s unprecedented spread and severity to the “failure to put basic public health
infrastructures in place.”

## there must be other things. And be it just bad luck. But we had these outbreaks before
## when the health-systems were also bad

Fifth, Ebola emerged nearly 40 years ago. Why are clinicians still empty-handed, with no vaccines and no
cure? Because Ebola has been, historically, geographically confined to poor African nations.
The R&D incentive is virtually non-existent. A profit-driven industry does not invest in products for markets
that cannot pay.

## and because outbreaks had been small in the past. There are lots of other pathogens with no vaccine

We have been trying to make this issue visible for many years, most recently through the deliberations of the
Consultative Expert Working Group on Research and Development: Financing and Coordination.
Finally, the world is ill-prepared to respond to any severe, sustained, and threatening public health
emergency.
This statement may sound familiar to some of you, as it was one of the main conclusions of the IHR Review
Committee convened to assess the response to the 2009 influenza pandemic.
The Ebola outbreak proves, beyond any shadow of a doubt, that this conclusion was spot on.
So what does all this tell us? Fundamentally, we have the priorities right, and these priorities finally have high
visibility and high-level political support.
They underscore how right WHO and its Regional Offices have been in arguing for the strengthening of basic
public health infrastructures, aiming for universal health coverage, and recognizing the urgent need to
strengthen IHR core capacities.
We must continue along these appropriate, and now widely embraced paths to better health and stronger
resilience for all.
Thank you.
 
Back
Top Bottom