• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Which healthcare workers work with acute respiratory illness? Evidence from Canadian acute-care hospitals during 4 influenza seasons: 2010-2011 to 201

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019 Jun 18:1-8. doi: 10.1017/ice.2019.141. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Which healthcare workers work with acute respiratory illness? Evidence from Canadian acute-care hospitals during 4 influenza seasons: 2010-2011 to 2013-2014.[/h] Jiang L[SUP]1[/SUP], McGeer A[SUP]1[/SUP], McNeil S[SUP]2[/SUP], Katz K[SUP]3[/SUP], Loeb M[SUP]4[/SUP], Muller MP[SUP]3[/SUP], Simor A[SUP]3[/SUP], Powis J[SUP]5[/SUP], Kohler P[SUP]1[/SUP], Di Bella JM[SUP]3[/SUP], Coleman BL[SUP]1[/SUP]; Canadian Healthcare Worker Study Group.
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]BACKGROUND:[/h] Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at risk of acquiring and transmitting respiratory viruses while working in healthcare settings.
[h=4]OBJECTIVES:[/h] To investigate the incidence of and factors associated with HCWs working during an acute respiratory illness (ARI).
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] HCWs from 9 Canadian hospitals were prospectively enrolled in active surveillance for ARI during the 2010-2011 to 2013-2014 influenza seasons. Daily illness diaries during ARI episodes collected information on symptoms and work attendance.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] At least 1 ARI episode was reported by 50.4% of participants each study season. Overall, 94.6% of ill individuals reported working at least 1 day while symptomatic, resulting in an estimated 1.9 days of working while symptomatic and 0.5 days of absence during an ARI per participant season. In multivariable analysis, the adjusted relative risk of working while symptomatic was higher for physicians and lower for nurses relative to other HCWs. Participants were more likely to work if symptoms were less severe and on the illness onset date compared to subsequent days. The most cited reason for working while symptomatic was that symptoms were mild and the HCW felt well enough to work (67%). Participants were more likely to state that they could not afford to stay home if they did not have paid sick leave and were younger.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] HCWs worked during most episodes of ARI, most often because their symptoms were mild. Further data are needed to understand how best to balance the costs and risks of absenteeism versus those associated with working while ill.


PMID: 31208477 DOI: 10.1017/ice.2019.141
 
Back
Top Bottom