• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

When critical thinking isn’t enough: to beat information overload, we need to learn ‘critical ignoring’

Mary Wilson

Well-known member
Published: February 2, 2023 4.00am EST

Authors Ralph Hertwig​, Anastasia Kozyreva​, Sam Wineburg​,Stephan Lewandowsky

The web is an informational paradise and a hellscape at the same time.

A boundless wealth of high-quality information is available at our fingertips right next to a ceaseless torrent of low-quality, distracting, false and manipulative information. ...

But is it enough in a world of information overabundance and gushing sources of disinformation? The answer is “No” for at least two reasons.

First, the digital world contains more information than the world’s libraries combined. Much of it comes from unvetted sources and lacks reliable indicators of trustworthiness. Critically thinking through all information and sources we come across would utterly paralyse us because we would never have time to actually read the valuable information we painstakingly identify.

Second, investing critical thinking in sources that should have been ignored in the first place means that attention merchants and malicious actors have been gifted what they wanted, our attention. ...

Critical ignoring is the ability to choose what to ignore and where to invest one’s limited attentional capacities. Critical ignoring is more than just not paying attention – it’s about practising mindful and healthy habits in the face of information overabundance. ...

https://theconversation.com/when-cr...source=twitter&utm_medium=bylinetwitterbutton




 
Thanks Mary. I had not heard of critical ignoring, but reading the article I find I have been employing all of the tactics listed for years. It seems to be an inevitable consequence of critical thinking, where time is a finite resource. I gave up on TV news decades ago as its linear structure ends up wasting time on trivial stories in the vain hope the editors might think something I view as newsworthy worth including, and even if they do it is treated so superficially you are barely any the wiser.
 
Back
Top