Giuseppe
Emeritus
PLoS Medicine: What Is the Optimal Therapy for Patients with H5N1 Influenza?
What Is the Optimal Therapy for Patients with H5N1 Influenza?
Nicholas J. White1*, Robert G. Webster2*, Elena A. Govorkova2, Timothy M. Uyeki3*
1 Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand,
2 Department of Infectious Diseases, Division of Virology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America,
3 Epidemiology and Prevention Branch, Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
Background to the debate
In a 2007 article in PLoS Medicine [10], Holger J. Sch?nemann and colleagues described a new process used by the World Health Organization for rapidly developing clinical management guidelines in emergency situations. These situations include outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases.
The authors discussed how they developed such a ?rapid advice? guideline for the pharmacological management of avian influenza A (H5N1) virus infection. The guideline recommends giving the antiviral drug oseltamivir at a dose of 75 mg twice daily for five days.
In this Debate, Nicholas White argues that such dosing is inadequate, Robert Webster and Elena Govorkova say that combination antiviral therapy should be used, and Tim Uyeki reminds us that clinical care of patients with H5N1 entails much more than antiviral treatment.
These issues may also apply to therapy of patients hospitalized with severe disease due to novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus infection.
Citation:
White NJ, Webster RG, Govorkova EA, Uyeki TM (2009) What Is the Optimal Therapy for Patients with H5N1 Influenza? PLoS Med 6(6): e1000091. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000091
Published: June 23, 2009
Copyright: ? 2009 White et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding:
NJW is a Wellcome Trust Principal Fellow. RGW and EAG are funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, under Contract No. HHSN266200700005C; and by the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC). The funders had no role in the decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. TMU received no specific funding.
Competing interests:
NJW is the co-chairman of the World Health Organization antimalarial treatment guidelines committee. RGW reports receiving research funding from Hoffmann-La Roche and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals and receiving consulting fees from GlaxoSmithKline. EAG reports receiving research funding from Hoffmann-La Roche and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals.
Abbreviations:
HPAI, highly pathogenic avian influenza A; RCT, randomised clinical trial; SARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome; SARS-CoV, SARS-associated coronavirus; WHO, World Health Organization
* E-mail: nickwdt@tropmedres.ac (NJW); robert.webster@stjude.org (RGW); tuyeki@cdc.gov (TMU)
? The findings and conclusions are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Provenance: Nicholas White's Viewpoint was originally submitted as an Essay, and was externally peer reviewed. The other two Viewpoints were commissioned and were not peer reviewed.
-
<cite cite="http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.1000091">PLoS Medicine: What Is the Optimal Therapy for Patients with H5N1 Influenza?</cite>Nicholas J. White1*, Robert G. Webster2*, Elena A. Govorkova2, Timothy M. Uyeki3*
1 Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand,
2 Department of Infectious Diseases, Division of Virology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America,
3 Epidemiology and Prevention Branch, Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
Background to the debate
In a 2007 article in PLoS Medicine [10], Holger J. Sch?nemann and colleagues described a new process used by the World Health Organization for rapidly developing clinical management guidelines in emergency situations. These situations include outbreaks of emerging infectious diseases.
The authors discussed how they developed such a ?rapid advice? guideline for the pharmacological management of avian influenza A (H5N1) virus infection. The guideline recommends giving the antiviral drug oseltamivir at a dose of 75 mg twice daily for five days.
In this Debate, Nicholas White argues that such dosing is inadequate, Robert Webster and Elena Govorkova say that combination antiviral therapy should be used, and Tim Uyeki reminds us that clinical care of patients with H5N1 entails much more than antiviral treatment.
These issues may also apply to therapy of patients hospitalized with severe disease due to novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus infection.
Citation:
White NJ, Webster RG, Govorkova EA, Uyeki TM (2009) What Is the Optimal Therapy for Patients with H5N1 Influenza? PLoS Med 6(6): e1000091. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000091
Published: June 23, 2009
Copyright: ? 2009 White et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Funding:
NJW is a Wellcome Trust Principal Fellow. RGW and EAG are funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, under Contract No. HHSN266200700005C; and by the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (ALSAC). The funders had no role in the decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. TMU received no specific funding.
Competing interests:
NJW is the co-chairman of the World Health Organization antimalarial treatment guidelines committee. RGW reports receiving research funding from Hoffmann-La Roche and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals and receiving consulting fees from GlaxoSmithKline. EAG reports receiving research funding from Hoffmann-La Roche and BioCryst Pharmaceuticals.
Abbreviations:
HPAI, highly pathogenic avian influenza A; RCT, randomised clinical trial; SARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome; SARS-CoV, SARS-associated coronavirus; WHO, World Health Organization
* E-mail: nickwdt@tropmedres.ac (NJW); robert.webster@stjude.org (RGW); tuyeki@cdc.gov (TMU)
? The findings and conclusions are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Provenance: Nicholas White's Viewpoint was originally submitted as an Essay, and was externally peer reviewed. The other two Viewpoints were commissioned and were not peer reviewed.
-