• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Wellcome Open Res . The effectiveness of social bubbles as part of a Covid-19 lockdown exit strategy, a modelling study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Wellcome Open Res


. 2020 Sep 10;5:213.
doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16164.1. eCollection 2020.
The effectiveness of social bubbles as part of a Covid-19 lockdown exit strategy, a modelling study


Trystan Leng[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Connor White[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Joe Hilton[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Adam Kucharski[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Lorenzo Pellis[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Helena Stage[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Nicholas G Davies[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Disease 2019 nCoV Working Group; Matt J Keeling[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Stefan Flasche[SUP] 2 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown, contact clustering in social bubbles may allow extending contacts beyond the household at minimal additional risk and hence has been considered as part of modified lockdown policy or a gradual lockdown exit strategy. We estimated the impact of such strategies on epidemic and mortality risk using the UK as a case study. Methods: We used an individual based model for a synthetic population similar to the UK, stratified into transmission risks from the community, within the household and from other households in the same social bubble. The base case considers a situation where non-essential shops and schools are closed, the secondary household attack rate is 20% and the initial reproduction number is 0.8. We simulate social bubble strategies (where two households form an exclusive pair) for households including children, for single occupancy households, and for all households. We test the sensitivity of results to a range of alternative model assumptions and parameters. Results: Clustering contacts outside the household into exclusive bubbles is an effective strategy of increasing contacts while limiting the associated increase in epidemic risk. In the base case, social bubbles reduced fatalities by 42% compared to an unclustered increase of contacts. We find that if all households were to form social bubbles the reproduction number would likely increase to above the epidemic threshold of R=1. Strategies allowing households with young children or single occupancy households to form social bubbles increased the reproduction number by less than 11%. The corresponding increase in mortality is proportional to the increase in the epidemic risk but is focussed in older adults irrespective of inclusion in social bubbles. Conclusions: ​ If managed appropriately, social bubbles can be an effective way of extending contacts beyond the household while limiting the increase in epidemic risk.

Keywords: Contact clustering; Covid-19; Exit strategy; Social bubble.
 
Back
Top Bottom