• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Warning against poor air quality in Norwegian cities; health hazard for vulnerable groups

Celvin11

Well-known member
Poor air quality in Norwegian cities

Air quality is currently poor in both Oslo, Bergen, Trondheim and Stavanger. The cause is pollution from cars and heating combined with low temperatures and stagnant air.

NTB NTB Published 07.01.2010 23:25 - Updated 07.01.2010 23:47 Via Google translator (with some improvements) http://www.aftenbladet.no/innenriks/1140243/Daarlig_luft_i_Stavanger.html

STAVANGER

In Kannik area in centre of Stavanger is so poor air quality that allergy sufferers and people with heart and respiratory illnesses are warned not to stay outdoors.

OSLO

In Oslo the past 24 hours have been recorded very poor air at two measuring points, the Hjortnes in Oslo harbor and Bygdøy Avenue. Air quality in these areas has been a health hazard for vulnerable groups, such as asthmatics and people with cardiovascular disease.

Thursday saw some improvement, but the senior researcher at the Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU) Dag Tønnesen, told NTB that there is a worsening back already from Friday.

Worsening

- From Friday it reported lower temperatures down in the city but it will be in North Marka. It will lead to a worsening of air quality in the center of a level which is already bad, "said Tønnesen NTB.

In Oslo, nitrogen dioxide, particulate matter and emissions as a result of increased heating demand that creates the bad air. In Trondheim, the cause is the same. In Bergen, it is mainly nitrogen. In Stavanger is the registration of bad air caused by particulate matter (svevestøv).

- We are somewhat surprised by the scale we have in Stavanger last day. Stavanger is not the same "pot effect" as particularly Bergen and Oslo. It is more open to the fjord. Yet it is as much particulate matter in areas of the city that air quality is poor.

Health risks

In Kannik area in Stavanger is so poor air quality that allergy sufferers and people with heart and respiratory illnesses are warned not to stay outdoors.

TRONDHEIM

In Trondheim it was Thursday moderate health risks. The worst was in the area around Market and the Heimdal Myra.

BERGEN

In Bergen was also the health risk moderate Thursday, but with a notice worsening of the evening and Friday.

In the Grenland area (Skien-Porsgrunn) are also notified significant deterioration of air quality on Friday.

In the other cities in the country are either moderate, little or no health risks due to air quality.

Less driving

Traffic and heating creates a great deal of pollution, which is visible and palpable discomfort in stagnant, cold air.

It is the oldest, worst-maintained cars and the oldest and worst wood-burning stoves that pollute the most. And the cheaper and less qualitative wood is, the more polluting it is, "says Tønnesen.

For example, spruce give greater emissions than the birch and raw wood providing greater emissions than dry wood. Tønnesen also calls for using good moves in the wood-burning oven.

He understands very well that it is less tempting to stand on the platform and wait for the train or the bus when it's really cold, but to pollution away people must drive smaller cars and avoid fire with bad fuel in old furnaces.
 
Back
Top