• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Viruses . Burden of Influenza and Respiratory Syncytial Viruses in Suspected COVID-19 Patients: A Cross-Sectional and Meta-Analysis Study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Viruses


. 2023 Mar 1;15(3):665.
doi: 10.3390/v15030665.
Burden of Influenza and Respiratory Syncytial Viruses in Suspected COVID-19 Patients: A Cross-Sectional and Meta-Analysis Study


Vivaldo Gomes da Costa[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ana Júlia Chaves Gomes[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Cíntia Bittar[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Dayla Bott Geraldini[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Pâmela Jóyce Previdelli da Conceição[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ágata Silva Cabral[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Tamara Carvalho[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Joice Matos Biselli[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Paola Jocelan Scarin Provazzi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Guilherme Rodrigues Fernandes Campos[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Paulo Ricardo da Silva Sanches[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Paulo Inácio Costa[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Maurício Lacerda Nogueira[SUP] 2 [/SUP], João Pessoa Araujo Jr[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Fernando Rosado Spilki[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Marília Freitas Calmon[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Paula Rahal[SUP] 1 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory viral infections, such as influenza virus (FluV) and human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), have contributed considerably to the burden of infectious diseases in the non-COVID-19 era. While the rates of co-infection in SARS-CoV-2-positive group (SCPG) patients have been determined, the burden of other respiratory viruses in the SARS-CoV-2-negative group (SCNG) remains unclear. Here, we conducted a cross-sectional study (São José do Rio Preto county, Brazil), and we collected our data using a meta-analysis to evaluate the pooled prevalence of FluV and RSV among SCNG patients. Out of the 901 patients suspected of COVID-19, our molecular results showed positivity of FluV and RSV in the SCNG was 2% (15/733) and 0.27% (2/733), respectively. Co-infection with SARS-CoV-2 and FluV, or RSV, was identified in 1.7% of the patients (3/168). Following our meta-analysis, 28 studies were selected (n = 114,318 suspected COVID-19 patients), with a pooled prevalence of 4% (95% CI: 3-6) for FluV and 2% (95% CI: 1-3) for RSV among SCNG patients were observed. Interestingly, FluV positivity in the SCNG was four times higher (OR = 4, 95% CI: 3.6-5.4, p < 0.01) than in the SCPG. Similarly, RSV positivity was significantly associated with SCNG patients (OR = 2.9, 95% CI: 2-4, p < 0.01). For subgroup analysis, cold-like symptoms, including fever, cough, sore throat, headache, myalgia, diarrhea, and nausea/vomiting, were positively associated (p < 0.05) with the SCPG. In conclusion, these results show that the pooled prevalence of FluV and RSV were significantly higher in the SCNG than in the SCPG during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2-negative; a systematic review; influenza virus; non-COVID-19; respiratory syncytial virus.
 
Back
Top Bottom