• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Virol Sin . Serologic Response to SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 Patients with Different Severity

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Virol Sin


. 2020 Jul 23.
doi: 10.1007/s12250-020-00270-x. Online ahead of print.
Serologic Response to SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 Patients with Different Severity


Wen-Hua Kong[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Rong Zhao[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Jun-Bo Zhou[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Fang Wang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], De-Guang Kong[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jian-Bin Sun[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Qiong-Fang Ruan[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Man-Qing Liu[SUP] 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

The immense patient number caused by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic brings the urge for more knowledge about its immunological features, including the profile of basic immune parameters. In this study, eighty-eight reported COVID-19 patients in Wuhan were recruited from January to February, 2020, including 32 severe/critical cases and 56 mild/moderate cases. Their mean age was 56.43 years (range 17-83) and gender ratio (male/female) was 43:45. We tested SARS-CoV-2 RNA with commercial kits, investigated the level of serologic IgM and IgG antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) using magnetic particle chemiluminescence immunoassays, and compared the results of serologic tests and nucleic acid test (NAT). Among 88 patients, 95.45% were confirmed as positive by the combination of NAT and antibody test, which was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than by single nucleic acid test (73.86%) or serologic test (65.91%). Then the correlation between temporal profile and the level of antibody response was analyzed. It showed that seroconversion started on day 5 after disease onset and IgG level was rose earlier than IgM. Comparison between patients with different disease severity suggested early seroconversion and high antibody titer were linked with less severe clinical symptoms. These results supported the combination of serologic testing and NAT in routine COVID-19 diagnosis and provided evidence on the temporal profile of antibody response in patients with different disease severity.

Keywords: COVID-19; Chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA); Nucleic acid test (NAT); Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCT); Serologic test.
 
Back
Top Bottom