tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Virol J
. 2021 May 21;18(1):101.
doi: 10.1186/s12985-021-01575-3.
Intravenous immunoglobulin-based adjuvant therapy for severe COVID-19: a single-center retrospective cohort study
Xiao Hou[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 [/SUP], Li Tian[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 2 [/SUP], Lei Zhou[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Xinhua Jia[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Li Kong[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Yitao Xue[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Hao Hao[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Xianqing Meng[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Feihu Zhang[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Xiaobin Dong[SUP] 4 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
Objective: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a major challenge facing the world. Certain guidelines issued by National Health Commission of the People's Repubilic of China recommend intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for adjuvant treatment of COVID-19. However, there is a lack of clinical evidence to support the use of IVIG.
Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included all adult patients with laboratory-confirmed severe COVID-19 in the Respiratory and Critical Care Unit of Dabie Mountain Regional Medical Center, China. Patient information, including demographic data, laboratory indicators, the use of glucocorticoids and IVIG, hospital mortality, the application of mechanical ventilation, and the length of hospital stay was collected. The primary outcome was the composite end point, including death and the use of mechanical ventilation. The secondary outcome was the length of hospital stay.
Results: Of the 285 patients with confirmed COVID-19, 113 severely ill patients were included in this study. Compared to the non-IVIG group, more patients in the IVIG group reached the composite end point [12 (25.5%) vs 5 (7.6%), P = 0.008] and had longer hospital stay periods [23.0 (19.0-31.0) vs 16.0 (13.8-22.0), P < 0.001]. After adjusting for confounding factors, differences in primary outcomes between the two groups were not statistically significant (P = 0.167), however, patients in the IVIG group had longer hospital stay periods (P = 0.041).
Conclusion: Adjuvant therapy with IVIG did not improve in-hospital mortality rates or the need for mechanical ventilation in severe COVID-19 patients. Our study does not support the use of immunoglobulin in patients with severe COVID-19 patients.
Keywords: COVID-19; Hospital length of stay; IVIG; Mechanical ventilation; Mortality; SARS-CoV-2.
. 2021 May 21;18(1):101.
doi: 10.1186/s12985-021-01575-3.
Intravenous immunoglobulin-based adjuvant therapy for severe COVID-19: a single-center retrospective cohort study
Xiao Hou[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 1 [/SUP], Li Tian[SUP] #[/SUP][SUP] 2 [/SUP], Lei Zhou[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Xinhua Jia[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Li Kong[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Yitao Xue[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Hao Hao[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Xianqing Meng[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Feihu Zhang[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Xiaobin Dong[SUP] 4 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 34020680
- DOI: 10.1186/s12985-021-01575-3
Abstract
Objective: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a major challenge facing the world. Certain guidelines issued by National Health Commission of the People's Repubilic of China recommend intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) for adjuvant treatment of COVID-19. However, there is a lack of clinical evidence to support the use of IVIG.
Methods: This single-center retrospective cohort study included all adult patients with laboratory-confirmed severe COVID-19 in the Respiratory and Critical Care Unit of Dabie Mountain Regional Medical Center, China. Patient information, including demographic data, laboratory indicators, the use of glucocorticoids and IVIG, hospital mortality, the application of mechanical ventilation, and the length of hospital stay was collected. The primary outcome was the composite end point, including death and the use of mechanical ventilation. The secondary outcome was the length of hospital stay.
Results: Of the 285 patients with confirmed COVID-19, 113 severely ill patients were included in this study. Compared to the non-IVIG group, more patients in the IVIG group reached the composite end point [12 (25.5%) vs 5 (7.6%), P = 0.008] and had longer hospital stay periods [23.0 (19.0-31.0) vs 16.0 (13.8-22.0), P < 0.001]. After adjusting for confounding factors, differences in primary outcomes between the two groups were not statistically significant (P = 0.167), however, patients in the IVIG group had longer hospital stay periods (P = 0.041).
Conclusion: Adjuvant therapy with IVIG did not improve in-hospital mortality rates or the need for mechanical ventilation in severe COVID-19 patients. Our study does not support the use of immunoglobulin in patients with severe COVID-19 patients.
Keywords: COVID-19; Hospital length of stay; IVIG; Mechanical ventilation; Mortality; SARS-CoV-2.