• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Virol J . Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Viral RNA in Fecal Samples

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Virol J


. 2020 Jun 30;17(1):86.
doi: 10.1186/s12985-020-01359-1.
Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Viral RNA in Fecal Samples

Alvaro Mesoraca[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Katia Margiotti[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Antonella Viola[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Antonella Cima[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Davide Sparacino[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Claudio Giorlandino[SUP] 1 [/SUP]


AffiliationsExpand
Free PMC article

Abstract

The need for timely establishment of a complete diagnostic protocol of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is demanded worldwide. We selected 15 positive novel coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) patients with mild or no symptom. Initially, fecal samples were negative in the 67% (10/15) of the cases, while 33% (5/10) of the cases were positive. After serial virus RNA testing, 73% (11/15) of the cases resulted positive to fecal specimens. In particular, 15 days after the first positive respiratory specimens test, 6 fecal specimens became positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, while 13 respiratory test returned negative result. In conclusion, qRT-PCR assays of fecal specimens, is an important step to control infection, suggesting that samples remained positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA longer time then respiratory tract samples. Our results enhance the recent knowledge on this emerging infectious disease and offer suggestions for a more complete diagnostic strategy.

Keywords: Acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Fecal specimens; Novel coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19); Respiratory specimens; SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA.
 
Back
Top Bottom