• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Virol J . Benefits of treatment with favipiravir in hospitalized patients for COVID-19: a retrospective observational case-control study

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Virol J


. 2021 May 25;18(1):102.
doi: 10.1186/s12985-021-01577-1.
Benefits of treatment with favipiravir in hospitalized patients for COVID-19: a retrospective observational case-control study


Anıl Ucan[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Pamir Cerci[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Serdar Efe[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Hakan Akgun[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Ahmet Ozmen[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Aysel Yagmuroglu[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Muzaffer Bilgin[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Deniz Avci[SUP] 8 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Although more than a year past since COVID-19 was defined, there is no specific treatment yet. Since COVID-19 management differs over time, it is hard to determine which therapy is more efficacious. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the regimen with Favipiravir (FPV) and determine if the timing of FPV addition offers any improvement.
Methods: A retrospective observational case-controlled cohort study was performed between March and September 2020, including adults with COVID-19 in a single-center in Turkey. We categorized patients into age-sex matched three groups, group 1 (n = 48) and group 2 (n = 48) included patients treated with the combination of FPV plus Hydroxychloroquine (HQ) early and late, respectively. Group 3 (n = 48) consisted of patients on HQ monotherapy. In Group 2, if the respiratory or clinic condition had not improved sufficiently, FPV was added on or after day 3.
Results: We found that starting FPV early had an impact on PCR negativity and the progression of the disease. 'No progression' was defined as the absence of a new finding in the control radiological examination and the absence of accompanying clinical deterioration. Also, the decrease in C-reactive protein (CRP) was greater in Group 1 than Group 3 (p < 0.001). However, we found that early initiation of FPV treatment did not have a positive effect on the estimated survival time.
Conclusions: According to this retrospective study results, we believe that for better clinical outcomes, FPV treatment should be started promptly to enhance antiviral effects and improve clinical outcomes.

Keywords: Antiviral therapy; Favipiravir; Hydroxychloroquine; Pneumonia; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
 
Back
Top Bottom