-
FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
-
We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.
Video - UK government data: (COVID-19) Antibodies in 99.3% of youth - June 28, 2022
- Thread starter sharon sanders
- Start date
Emily
Editor, Senior Moderator
Something is being passed through the air from vaccinated parents to their children - either the antibodies or the spike proteins. This study compared kids of unvaccinated parents to kids of vaccinated parents. They haven't looked at this yet regarding the acute hepatitis - and probably won't.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1....28.22274443v1
Evidence for Aerosol Transfer of SARS-CoV2-specific Humoral Immunity
Ross M. Kedl, Elena Hsieh, Thomas E. Morrison, Gabriela Samayoa-Reyes, Siobhan Flaherty, Conner L. Jackson, Rosemary Rochford
medRxiv 2022.04.28.22274443; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.28.22274443 This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
Abstract
Despite the obvious knowledge that infectious particles can be shared through respiration, whether other constituents of the nasal/oral fluids can be passed between hosts has surprisingly never even been postulated, let alone investigated. The circumstances of the present pandemic facilitated a unique opportunity to fully examine this provocative idea. The data we show provides evidence for a new mechanism by which herd immunity may be manifested, the aerosol transfer of antibodies between immune and non-immune hosts.
https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1....28.22274443v1
Evidence for Aerosol Transfer of SARS-CoV2-specific Humoral Immunity
Ross M. Kedl, Elena Hsieh, Thomas E. Morrison, Gabriela Samayoa-Reyes, Siobhan Flaherty, Conner L. Jackson, Rosemary Rochford
medRxiv 2022.04.28.22274443; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.28.22274443 This article is a preprint and has not been peer-reviewed [what does this mean?]. It reports new medical research that has yet to be evaluated and so should not be used to guide clinical practice.
Abstract
Despite the obvious knowledge that infectious particles can be shared through respiration, whether other constituents of the nasal/oral fluids can be passed between hosts has surprisingly never even been postulated, let alone investigated. The circumstances of the present pandemic facilitated a unique opportunity to fully examine this provocative idea. The data we show provides evidence for a new mechanism by which herd immunity may be manifested, the aerosol transfer of antibodies between immune and non-immune hosts.
Last edited:
sharon sanders
Editor-in-Chief & President
I will never subscribe to the idea that children are only testing positive but do not actually have the disease. This is not the character of "colds".
Do you know why the "anti-vax" crowd gets so much negativity? Because of the focused adherence to a philosophy that blames vaccines for everything - even in the face of common sense logic.
Children who test positive most likely have had the disease - not air transmission of antibody material from a vaccinated parent.
I am not making the case that children should be vaccinated. I am saying that millions of children have been exposed to real live infection in school and in the household and millions have been infected. Since they appear well, they are not routinely tested, and the death rate is miniscule.
Do you know why the "anti-vax" crowd gets so much negativity? Because of the focused adherence to a philosophy that blames vaccines for everything - even in the face of common sense logic.
Children who test positive most likely have had the disease - not air transmission of antibody material from a vaccinated parent.
I am not making the case that children should be vaccinated. I am saying that millions of children have been exposed to real live infection in school and in the household and millions have been infected. Since they appear well, they are not routinely tested, and the death rate is miniscule.
Emily
Editor, Senior Moderator
Sharon, I doubt even the broadest definition of 'anti-vax' would include the authors of the aerosol transfer study. One small study isn't dogma, but it's an excellent and intriguing study.
"The vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have maintained remarkable efficacy against severe
disease and death in those vaccinated regardless of variant emergence, Omicron included.
Less appreciated than the systemic immunity generated by the vaccines are the high levels of
antibody (IgG and IgA) found within the nasal cavity and saliva of vaccinees. This outcome is
found in both humans and primates, and in response to both mRNA and protein-based vaccines.
Respiratory transmission of viral infection is proof that oral/nasal cavity constituents can be
communicated through aerosols and/or respiratory droplets. As such, it would stand to reason
that antibody present within the oral/nasal environment may also be aerosolized to some
degree."
"To evaluate this hypothesis, we obtained nasal swabs from children living in
households in which parents or family members had varying degrees of SARS-CoV2-specifc
immunity, including those unvaccinated, vaccinated and COVID-19+. Initial comparison of nasal
swabs acquired from children living in vaccinated households revealed readily detectable
SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG (Fig 1E), especially when compared to the complete deficit of SARS-
CoV-2-specific antibody detected in the few nasal swabs we obtained from children in non-
vaccinated households. We then used the variation in parents’ levels of intranasal IgG as the
basis of stratification across all children’s samples. Log transformation of the data from thirty-
four adult-child pairs established antibody cut-offs for high vs low parental intranasal antibody
levels. Evaluation of samples in this fashion revealed that high intranasal IgG in vaccinated
parents was significantly associated (p-value = 0.01) with a 0.38 increase in the log transformed
intranasal IgG gMFIs within a child from the same household (Fig 1F). This significant positive
relationship was observed using either parametric or non-parametric analysis, and adjustments
for the correlation within household did not alter the conclusion. Though not statistically
significant, a similar trend of elevated IgA was found in the same samples."
"The vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have maintained remarkable efficacy against severe
disease and death in those vaccinated regardless of variant emergence, Omicron included.
Less appreciated than the systemic immunity generated by the vaccines are the high levels of
antibody (IgG and IgA) found within the nasal cavity and saliva of vaccinees. This outcome is
found in both humans and primates, and in response to both mRNA and protein-based vaccines.
Respiratory transmission of viral infection is proof that oral/nasal cavity constituents can be
communicated through aerosols and/or respiratory droplets. As such, it would stand to reason
that antibody present within the oral/nasal environment may also be aerosolized to some
degree."
"To evaluate this hypothesis, we obtained nasal swabs from children living in
households in which parents or family members had varying degrees of SARS-CoV2-specifc
immunity, including those unvaccinated, vaccinated and COVID-19+. Initial comparison of nasal
swabs acquired from children living in vaccinated households revealed readily detectable
SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG (Fig 1E), especially when compared to the complete deficit of SARS-
CoV-2-specific antibody detected in the few nasal swabs we obtained from children in non-
vaccinated households. We then used the variation in parents’ levels of intranasal IgG as the
basis of stratification across all children’s samples. Log transformation of the data from thirty-
four adult-child pairs established antibody cut-offs for high vs low parental intranasal antibody
levels. Evaluation of samples in this fashion revealed that high intranasal IgG in vaccinated
parents was significantly associated (p-value = 0.01) with a 0.38 increase in the log transformed
intranasal IgG gMFIs within a child from the same household (Fig 1F). This significant positive
relationship was observed using either parametric or non-parametric analysis, and adjustments
for the correlation within household did not alter the conclusion. Though not statistically
significant, a similar trend of elevated IgA was found in the same samples."