• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Vet World . Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward avian influenza among free-grazing duck farmers in Central Thailand: An analytical cross-sect

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vet World


. 2026 Jan;19(1):97-110.
doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2026.97-110. Epub 2026 Jan 8.
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward avian influenza among free-grazing duck farmers in Central Thailand: An analytical cross-sectional study

Supanat Boonyapisitsopa[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Kamonpan Charoenkul[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Napawan Bunpapong[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Supassama Chaiyawong[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Chanakarn Nasamran[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Kannika Thammasutti[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Chutarat Saengkul[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Somsak Pakpinyo[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Kanokwan Suwannarong[SUP] 2 3 [/SUP], Alongkorn Amonsin[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP]


Affiliations
Abstract

Background and aim: Free-grazing duck (FGD) production systems play a vital economic role in Thailand but are also recognized as potential sources and amplifiers of avian influenza (AI) viruses at the human-animal-environment interface. Understanding the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of individuals involved in FGD production is crucial for effective prevention and control of AI. This study aimed to assess AI-related KAP levels among FGD farmers and related workers in central Thailand and to identify demographic, occupational, and behavioral factors linked to these KAP outcomes.
Materials and methods: An analytical cross-sectional survey was conducted from January to May 2023, involving 101 participants working in FGD production systems across Ayutthaya, Suphan Buri, and Nakhon Sawan provinces. Data were obtained through face-to-face interviews using a structured, expert-validated questionnaire that covered socio-demographic details, animal exposure, vaccination history, and AI-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices. KAP scores were determined using standardized scoring criteria. The relationships between KAP scores and explanatory variables were analyzed using simple and multiple linear regression.
Results: The average knowledge score was 8.65 ± 2.39 (out of 12), the average attitude score was 3.63 ± 0.36 (out of 5), and the average practice score was 3.17 ± 0.38 (out of 5). Overall, 58.4% of participants demonstrated good knowledge, 66.3% exhibited positive attitudes, and 38.6% reported good preventive practices against AI. Knowledge scores were significantly linked to daily working hours with FGDs, contact with other animals, and influenza vaccination history. Positive attitudes were significantly influenced by educational level and occupation, while good practices were associated with higher education, type of FGD production system, animal contact, and vaccination during poultry work. Moderate positive correlations were observed between knowledge and attitude scores and between attitude and practice scores.
Conclusion: This study offers the first comprehensive assessment of KAP regarding AI among FGD farmers in Thailand. Although knowledge and attitudes about AI were generally adequate, preventive measures were relatively inadequate. Improving targeted public health education, increasing vaccination awareness, and implementing One Health-based biosecurity measures are recommended to boost AI prevention and readiness in FGD production systems.

Keywords: One Health; Thailand; attitude; avian influenza; free-grazing ducks; knowledge; practice; public health.

 
Back
Top