tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Vet Sci
. 2024 Oct 5;11(10):475.
doi: 10.3390/vetsci11100475. How Do Flemish Laying Hen Farmers and Private Bird Keepers Comply with and Think about Measures to Control Avian Influenza?
Femke Delanglez[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Bart Ampe[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Anneleen Watteyn[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Liesbeth G W Van Damme[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Frank A M Tuyttens[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Competent authorities of many countries, including Belgium, impose control measures (preventing wild bird access to feeders and water facilities, indoor confinement of captive birds, or fencing off outdoor ranges with nets) on professional and non-professional keepers of birds to prevent the spread of avian influenza (AI). Flemish laying hen farmers (FAR, n = 33) and private keepers of captive birds (PRI, n = 263) were surveyed about their opinion on and compliance with AI measures legally imposed during the most recent high-risk period before this survey in 2021. Participants answered questions on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = the worst, 3 = neutral, and 5 = the best). FAR indicated better compliance with the AI measures than PRI, except for net confinement. FAR indicated that they and other poultry farmers complied better with AI measures than PRI. Additionally, PRI indicated that they better complied than other PRI keepers. FAR regarded the AI measures as more effective than PRI. To prevent the spread of AI more effectively, national authorities could focus on information campaigns explaining to private bird keepers the need for the various control measures that they impose. If these campaigns fail, local authorities may need stricter enforcement or alternative ways to increase compliance.
Keywords: avian influenza; confinement; nets; poultry; self-evaluation.
. 2024 Oct 5;11(10):475.
doi: 10.3390/vetsci11100475. How Do Flemish Laying Hen Farmers and Private Bird Keepers Comply with and Think about Measures to Control Avian Influenza?
Femke Delanglez[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP], Bart Ampe[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Anneleen Watteyn[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Liesbeth G W Van Damme[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Frank A M Tuyttens[SUP] 1 2 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 39453067
- DOI: 10.3390/vetsci11100475
Competent authorities of many countries, including Belgium, impose control measures (preventing wild bird access to feeders and water facilities, indoor confinement of captive birds, or fencing off outdoor ranges with nets) on professional and non-professional keepers of birds to prevent the spread of avian influenza (AI). Flemish laying hen farmers (FAR, n = 33) and private keepers of captive birds (PRI, n = 263) were surveyed about their opinion on and compliance with AI measures legally imposed during the most recent high-risk period before this survey in 2021. Participants answered questions on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = the worst, 3 = neutral, and 5 = the best). FAR indicated better compliance with the AI measures than PRI, except for net confinement. FAR indicated that they and other poultry farmers complied better with AI measures than PRI. Additionally, PRI indicated that they better complied than other PRI keepers. FAR regarded the AI measures as more effective than PRI. To prevent the spread of AI more effectively, national authorities could focus on information campaigns explaining to private bird keepers the need for the various control measures that they impose. If these campaigns fail, local authorities may need stricter enforcement or alternative ways to increase compliance.
Keywords: avian influenza; confinement; nets; poultry; self-evaluation.