• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Vaccines (Basel) . Understanding the Impact of Approved but Unfunded Vaccine Status on Parental Acceptance of an Adjuvanted Seasonal Influenza Vacc

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccines (Basel)


. 2022 Oct 21;10(10):1769.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines10101769.
Understanding the Impact of Approved but Unfunded Vaccine Status on Parental Acceptance of an Adjuvanted Seasonal Influenza Vaccine for Infants: Results from the Pediatric Influenza Vaccination Optimization Trial (PIVOT)-III


William A Fisher[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Vladimir Gilca[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Michelle Murti[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Alison Orth[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Hartley Garfield[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Paul Roumeliotis[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Emmanouil Rampakakis[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Vivien Brown[SUP] 8 [/SUP], John Yaremko[SUP] 9 10 [/SUP], Paul Van Buynder[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Constantina Boikos[SUP] 12 [/SUP], James A Mansi[SUP] 12 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Free article

Abstract

The adjuvanted trivalent influenza vaccine (aTIV) provides enhanced protection against influenza for infants but is not publicly funded (NPF). The objective of this prospective cohort study of parents with children 6 through 23 months of age was to understand how NPF status influences parental perceptions of approved but unfunded vaccines and their intentions to vaccinate. At healthy baby visits, clinicians provided parents with information about influenza and vaccination. Before and after these interactions, a research nurse assessed parents' intentions to vaccinate their children and their beliefs about the safety, efficacy, and necessity of vaccinating their children with aTIV in both publicly funded (PF) and NPF settings. Overall, 15 community practice clinics (n = 15 physicians) and nine public health clinics (n = 9 nurses) recruited 207 parents. The percentage of parents intending to immunize their children with aTIV decreased from 72% (vaccine PF, free of charge), to 42% (NPF, $25 per dose), to 27% (NPF, $50 per dose). Funding status strongly influenced whether parents perceived immunization with aTIV to be necessary, safe, and effective. Information on influenza and influenza vaccines should be provided to parents routinely to allow for well-informed decisions on the suitability of specific influenza vaccines for their child.

Keywords: approved vaccine; influenza; parental acceptance; unfunded vaccine; vaccine hesitancy.
 
Back
Top Bottom