• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Vaccines (Basel) . Pfizer-BioNTech and Sinopharm: A Comparative Study on Post-Vaccination Antibody Titers

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccines (Basel)


. 2021 Oct 21;9(11):1223.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines9111223.
Pfizer-BioNTech and Sinopharm: A Comparative Study on Post-Vaccination Antibody Titers


Rami Alqassieh[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Aiman Suleiman[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Sami Abu-Halaweh[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Abeer Santarisi[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Omar Shatnawi[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Lara Shdaifat[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Amjed Tarifi[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Mohammad Al-Tamimi[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Abdel-Ellah Al-Shudifat[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Heba Alsmadi[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Ahmed Al Sharqawi[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Hadeel Alnawaiseh[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Yara Anasweh[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Farah Abo Domaidah[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Haneen Abu Jaber[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Mohammad Rashid Al-Zarir[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Isam Bsisu[SUP] 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) vaccines induce immunity through different mechanisms. The aim of this study is to compare the titers of specific antibodies in subjects vaccinated with either the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine or the Sinopharm vaccine. This prospective observational cohort included Jordanian adults vaccinated with two doses, 21 days apart, of either of the two aforementioned vaccines. Titers were collected 6 weeks after the administration of the second dose. Overall, 288 participants were included, of which 141 were administered the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, while 147 were administered the Sinopharm vaccine. Remarkably, 140 (99.3%) of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine recipients had positive IgG titers, while 126 (85.7%) of Sinopharm recipients had positive IgG (p < 0.001). The mean titer for IgG among Pfizer-BioNTech recipients was 515.5 ± 1143.5 BAU/mL, compared to 170.0 ± 230.0 BAU/mL among Sinopharm subjects (p < 0.001). Multivariable regression analysis showed that the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine positively correlated with positive IgG titers (OR: 25.25; 95% CI: 3.25-196.15; p = 0.002), compared with a negative effect of cardiovascular diseases (OR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.11-0.99; p = 0.48) on IgG titers. In conclusion, fully vaccinated recipients of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine had superior quantitative efficiency compared to Sinopharm recipients. A booster dose is supported for Sinopharm recipients, or those with chronic immunosuppressive diseases.

Keywords: COVID-19; Pfizer-BioNTech; Sinopharm; antibody; titers; vaccine.
 
Back
Top Bottom