tetano
Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccines (Basel)
. 2022 Mar 15;10(3):452.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines10030452.
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Adolescents: Cross-Sectional School Survey in Four Chinese Cities Prior to Vaccine Availability
Palizhati Rehati[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nubiya Amaerjiang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Liping Yang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Huidi Xiao[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Menglong Li[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jiawulan Zunong[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Long Wang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sten H Vermund[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Yifei Hu[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
Abstract
To address the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, development and regulatory evaluations have been accelerated for vaccines, authorizing emergency use. To anticipate vaccine preparedness in adolescents, we studied COVID-19 vaccination awareness and willingness to vaccinate before the vaccine became available. We conducted a cross-sectional survey among 9153 (4575 boys, 50%) students with a mean age of 14.2 years old in four cities in China to collect information on demographic characteristics and their COVID-19 vaccination concerns. Multinomial logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of vaccine hesitancy ("not sure") and resistance ("do not want it"). The results showed that 2891 (31.6%) were hesitant and 765 (8.4%) were resistant to being vaccinated. Additionally, multivariable analyses showed that vaccine hesitancy and vaccine resistance were associated with living in the Beijing area (OR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.40-1.88; OR = 1.81; 95% CI: 1.44-2.28), lack of influenza vaccination experience (OR = 1.33; 95% CI: 1.14-1.55; OR = 1.57; 95% CI: 1.25-1.98), no perceived susceptibility (OR = 1.72; 95% CI: 1.50-1.97; OR = 3.57; 95% CI: 2.86-4.46), and perceiving no cues to action (OR = 3.24; 95% CI: 2.56-4.11; OR = 27.68; 95% CI: 21.81-35.13). Postulating a highly effective vaccine (OR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.72-0.98; OR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.52-0.83) decreased both vaccine hesitancy and resistance. Vaccine hesitancy alone was associated with girls (OR = 1.21; 95% CI: 1.09-1.36) and was less common among students boarding at school (OR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.68-0.92), postulating convenient vaccine access (OR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.73-0.96), and having doctors' recommendation (OR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.76-0.98). In conclusion, the results of the study showed that vaccine hesitancy among students in China was associated with limited health literacy and lower risk awareness. Our findings in China suggest that educating youth regarding COVID-19 and the safety and effectiveness of immunization help reduce concerns and increase vaccine confidence and acceptance.
Keywords: COVID-19 vaccine; adolescents; vaccination; vaccine hesitancy; willingness.
. 2022 Mar 15;10(3):452.
doi: 10.3390/vaccines10030452.
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Adolescents: Cross-Sectional School Survey in Four Chinese Cities Prior to Vaccine Availability
Palizhati Rehati[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Nubiya Amaerjiang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Liping Yang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Huidi Xiao[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Menglong Li[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jiawulan Zunong[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Long Wang[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sten H Vermund[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Yifei Hu[SUP] 1 [/SUP]
Affiliations
- PMID: 35335083
- DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10030452
Abstract
To address the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, development and regulatory evaluations have been accelerated for vaccines, authorizing emergency use. To anticipate vaccine preparedness in adolescents, we studied COVID-19 vaccination awareness and willingness to vaccinate before the vaccine became available. We conducted a cross-sectional survey among 9153 (4575 boys, 50%) students with a mean age of 14.2 years old in four cities in China to collect information on demographic characteristics and their COVID-19 vaccination concerns. Multinomial logistic regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of vaccine hesitancy ("not sure") and resistance ("do not want it"). The results showed that 2891 (31.6%) were hesitant and 765 (8.4%) were resistant to being vaccinated. Additionally, multivariable analyses showed that vaccine hesitancy and vaccine resistance were associated with living in the Beijing area (OR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.40-1.88; OR = 1.81; 95% CI: 1.44-2.28), lack of influenza vaccination experience (OR = 1.33; 95% CI: 1.14-1.55; OR = 1.57; 95% CI: 1.25-1.98), no perceived susceptibility (OR = 1.72; 95% CI: 1.50-1.97; OR = 3.57; 95% CI: 2.86-4.46), and perceiving no cues to action (OR = 3.24; 95% CI: 2.56-4.11; OR = 27.68; 95% CI: 21.81-35.13). Postulating a highly effective vaccine (OR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.72-0.98; OR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.52-0.83) decreased both vaccine hesitancy and resistance. Vaccine hesitancy alone was associated with girls (OR = 1.21; 95% CI: 1.09-1.36) and was less common among students boarding at school (OR = 0.79; 95% CI: 0.68-0.92), postulating convenient vaccine access (OR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.73-0.96), and having doctors' recommendation (OR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.76-0.98). In conclusion, the results of the study showed that vaccine hesitancy among students in China was associated with limited health literacy and lower risk awareness. Our findings in China suggest that educating youth regarding COVID-19 and the safety and effectiveness of immunization help reduce concerns and increase vaccine confidence and acceptance.
Keywords: COVID-19 vaccine; adolescents; vaccination; vaccine hesitancy; willingness.