• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Vaccine . Use of composite outcomes in cluster randomized control trials of influenza vaccines

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine


. 2026 Jan 13:74:128224.
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128224. Online ahead of print.
Use of composite outcomes in cluster randomized control trials of influenza vaccines

Kingsley Cheng[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Eleanor Pullenayegum[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Pardeep Singh[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Mark Loeb[SUP] 4 [/SUP]


Affiliations
Abstract

Background: Despite being widely used in other fields, composite outcomes are seldom used in influenza vaccine randomized trials. Vaccine trialists may benefit from the increased event rates and power of composite outcomes. We explored the use of a composite outcome on a series of randomized control trials conducted within Canadian Hutterite communities.
Methods: Using data from three blinded, cluster randomized control trials of pediatric influenza vaccination, we assessed the use of a composite outcome of antimicrobial prescription, school or work-related absenteeism, and medically attended visits for respiratory illness. Key comparisons between component outcomes and the composite included odds reduction, frequency, and confidence intervals.
Results: In Trial 1, 65 Hutterite colonies were randomly assigned to receive either the influenza vaccine or the hepatitis A vaccine. Among all season 1 and 3 participants in Trial 1, the composite outcome yielded a greater event rate, significance, precision, and a greater protective effect than its components. Within participants across all seasons in Trial 2, the composite yielded a greater event rate, lower significance, a null protective effect, and greater precision than two out of three of its components. Among all participants across all seasons in Trial 3, the composite outcome yielded a greater event rate and a weaker protective effect than its components, with no notable differences in precision or significance.
Conclusions: Composite outcomes can be a viable approach to raise event rates and increase the precision of estimates in influenza vaccine trials and should be explored further within this field.

Keywords: Combined; Compound; Endpoint; Estimate; RCT; Variable.

 
Back
Top Bottom