• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Vaccine . The cost-effectiveness of vaccination against COVID-19 in at-risk populations and older adults in the United Kingdom: Projections using a

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine


. 2026 May 15:85:128687.
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2026.128687. Online ahead of print.
The cost-effectiveness of vaccination against COVID-19 in at-risk populations and older adults in the United Kingdom: Projections using a dynamic transmission model

Michele Kohli[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Michael Maschio[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Amy Lee[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Stephen Kissler[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Stuart Carroll[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Nicholas van de Velde[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Ekkehard Beck[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Orsolya Balogh[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Keya Joshi[SUP] 9 [/SUP]


Affiliations
Abstract

Objective: This study estimates the potential clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of an Autumn COVID-19 vaccination campaign in the United Kingdom (UK) using a variant-adapted mRNA-1273 vaccine in those aged ≥65 years and those aged 6 months-64 years at high risk (base case population) of severe outcomes, as well as the effect of implementing more restrictive vaccine eligibility requirements.
Methods: A Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Recovered (SEIR) model was used to predict COVID-19 cases and hospitalisations in the UK. A COVID-19 vaccination and infection consequences decision tree was used to predict health outcomes, costs and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) losses associated with symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections as well as costs and QALY losses associated with COVID-19 vaccination and adverse events over a 1-year time horizon.
Results: Compared to no vaccination, an Autumn mRNA-1273 vaccination campaign is predicted to decrease the number of symptomatic infections from 21.9 million to 20.0 million, and the number of hospitalisations from 150,000 to 116,000. COVID-related deaths and long COVID cases are decreased by 7200 and 18,000, respectively. Costs saved are £467.7 million with 52,000 QALYs gained, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £8963/QALY gained. The ICER was most sensitive to infection incidence, population immunity before the vaccination campaign, vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation, and hospitalisation probabilities. Narrowing the vaccination eligibility criteria to those aged ≥75 years and those aged 6 months-74 years at high risk of severe outcomes results in fewer outcomes prevented, with 525,300 more symptomatic infections, 6000 more hospitalisations, 1100 additional deaths, and 5200 additional cases of long COVID, compared to the base case. Vaccination of the broader population compared to the narrower population is associated with an ICER of £11,753/QALY gained.
Conclusions: Vaccinating adults aged ≥65 years and high-risk individuals 6 months-64 years remains cost-effective compared both to no vaccination and vaccination of the narrower population.

Keywords: COVID-19; Coronavirus; Cost-effectiveness; SARS-CoV-2; United Kingdom; Vaccination.

 
Back
Top