• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Vaccine . Sustained superior humoral immune responses of mRNA vaccines compared to Sputnik V viral vector COVID-19 vaccines in naïve and convalesce

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine


. 2025 Dec 2:70:128018.
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.128018. Online ahead of print. Sustained superior humoral immune responses of mRNA vaccines compared to Sputnik V viral vector COVID-19 vaccines in naïve and convalescent populations

Anass Abbad[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Brian Lerman[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Jordan Ehrenhaus[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Diego Sebastian Ojeda[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Charles Gleason[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Gagandeep Singh[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Zain Khalil[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Ana Silvia Gonzalez-Reiche[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Komal Srivastava[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ana Fernandez Sesma[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Andrea Gamarnik[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Viviana Simon[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Florian Krammer[SUP] 6 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Background: The choice of vaccine platform fundamentally influences the magnitude and durability of antibody responses against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). We compared humoral immune responses between BNT162b2/mRNA-1273 (mRNA) and Sputnik V (adenoviral vector) vaccines across multiple timepoints.
Methods: Anti-ancestral (WT) spike binding antibodies were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and neutralizing antibodies by microneutralization assay using live SARS-CoV-2 WA.1 strain. Sera from 48 naïve and 24 convalescent study participants were collected prior and after the primary immunization (mRNA: 28; Sputnik V: 44).
Results: mRNA vaccines elicited higher binding antibody responses (p < 0.001 in naïve, p < 0.05 in convalescent participants) and neutralizing antibody responses (p < 0.001 in naïve participants) compared to Sputnik V. Antibody decay kinetics were similar between platforms (half-life ∼5 months), with mRNA vaccines maintaining sustained superiority through 6 months post-vaccination.
Conclusions: mRNA vaccination provides markedly superior and sustained antibody responses compared to adenoviral vector vaccine, which is particularly relevant for long-term protection strategies.

Keywords: BNT162b2; Immunogenicity; SARS-CoV-2; Sputnik V; Viral vector vaccine; mRNA vaccine; mRNA-1273.

 
Back
Top Bottom