• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Vaccine: Pandemic A(H1N1)2009 influenza vaccination in Lyon University Hospitals, France: Perception and attitudes of hospital workers

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine

Volume 31, Issue 4, 11 January 2013, Pages 592?595
Cover image
Brief report
Pandemic A(H1N1)2009 influenza vaccination in Lyon University Hospitals, France: Perception and attitudes of hospital workers

F. Valoura, Corresponding author contact information, E-mail the corresponding author,
T. B?netb,
C. Chidiaca, c,
for the study group 1

a Infectious Diseases Department, Lyon University Hospitals, Lyon, France
b Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Lyon University Hospitals, Lyon, France
c Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.11.070
Abstract

Health-care authorities encouraged A(H1N1)2009 influenza vaccination for all hospital workers because of their high risk of contracting and transmitting the virus.

Six months after the vaccination campaign began, an electronic anonymous questionnaire was completed by 1630 among 14,000 hospital workers (11.6%). Vaccination rate was 54.3%. Independent predictors for vaccination acceptance were advanced age (OR = 1.61?2.19), being a physician (OR = 5.07), working in gynaecology-obstetrics or podiatry (OR = 1.62), and having been informed about vaccination (OR = 2.78). The main reasons for getting vaccinated were to avoid flu for relatives (82.4%), themselves (65.8%) and patients (57.1%). Arguments against vaccination were lack of sufficient studies of the vaccine (75.7%) and the perception of A(H1N1)2009 influenza as a benign disease (51.5%).

Vaccination coverage would be insufficient to keep the health-care system operating at maximum capacity during a severe pandemic disease, and to avoid nosocomial transmission of influenza. These results suggest a better-targeted vaccination campaign.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X12017203
 
Back
Top Bottom