• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Vaccine . Health and economic impact of seasonal influenza mass vaccination strategies in European settings: A mathematical modelling and cost-effec

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine


. 2022 Jan 31;S0264-410X(22)00039-1.
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.01.015. Online ahead of print.
Health and economic impact of seasonal influenza mass vaccination strategies in European settings: A mathematical modelling and cost-effectiveness analysis


Frank G Sandmann[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Edwin van Leeuwen[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Sibylle Bernard-Stoecklin[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Itziar Casado[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Jesús Castilla[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Lisa Domegan[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Alin Gherasim[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Mariëtte Hooiveld[SUP] 7 [/SUP], Irina Kislaya[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Amparo Larrauri[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Daniel Levy-Bruhl[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Ausenda Machado[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Diogo F P Marques[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Iván Martínez-Baz[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Clara Mazagatos[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Jim McMenamin[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Adam Meijer[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Josephine L K Murray[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Baltazar Nunes[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Joan O'Donnell[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Arlene Reynolds[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Dominic Thorrington[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Richard Pebody[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Marc Baguelin[SUP] 13 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Introduction: Despite seasonal influenza vaccination programmes in most countries targeting individuals aged ≥ 65 (or ≥ 55) years and high risk-groups, significant disease burden remains. We explored the impact and cost-effectiveness of 27 vaccination programmes targeting the elderly and/or children in eight European settings (n = 205.8 million).
Methods: We used an age-structured dynamic-transmission model to infer age- and (sub-)type-specific seasonal influenza virus infections calibrated to England, France, Ireland, Navarra, The Netherlands, Portugal, Scotland, and Spain between 2010/11 and 2017/18. The base-case vaccination scenario consisted of non-adjuvanted, non-high dose trivalent vaccines (TV) and no universal paediatric vaccination. We explored i) moving the elderly to "improved" (i.e., adjuvanted or high-dose) trivalent vaccines (iTV) or non-adjuvanted non-high-dose quadrivalent vaccines (QV); ii) adopting mass paediatric vaccination with TV or QV; and iii) combining the elderly and paediatric strategies. We estimated setting-specific costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained from the healthcare perspective, and discounted QALYs at 3.0%.
Results: In the elderly, the estimated numbers of infection per 100,000 population are reduced by a median of 261.5 (range across settings: 154.4, 475.7) when moving the elderly to iTV and by 150.8 (77.6, 262.3) when moving them to QV. Through indirect protection, adopting mass paediatric programmes with 25% uptake achieves similar reductions in the elderly of 233.6 using TV (range: 58.9, 425.6) or 266.5 using QV (65.7, 477.9), with substantial health gains from averted infections across ages. At €35,000/QALY gained, moving the elderly to iTV plus adopting mass paediatric QV programmes provides the highest mean net benefits and probabilities of being cost-effective in all settings and paediatric coverage levels.
Conclusion: Given the direct and indirect protection, and depending on the vaccine prices, model results support a combination of having moved the elderly to an improved vaccine and adopting universal paediatric vaccination programmes across the European settings.

Keywords: Economic evaluation; Influenza; Mathematical model; Policy; Public health; Vaccination.
 
Back
Top Bottom