• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Vaccine . Enhanced immune responses to mRNA compared with adenoviral vector COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy: implications for pandemic preparedne

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine


. 2026 Feb 15:73:128153.
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.128153. Epub 2026 Jan 7. Enhanced immune responses to mRNA compared with adenoviral vector COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy: implications for pandemic preparedness

Larissa De Brabandere[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Sereina A Herzog[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Isabelle Desombere[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Kevin K Ariën[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Véronique Olislagers[SUP] 5 [/SUP], Daphnée Georges[SUP] 6 [/SUP], Nicolas Dauby[SUP] 7 [/SUP], An Vercoutere[SUP] 8 [/SUP], Maria Goossens[SUP] 9 [/SUP], Pieter Pannus[SUP] 10 [/SUP], Elke Leuridan[SUP] 11 [/SUP], Arnaud Marchant[SUP] 12 [/SUP], Kirsten Maertens[SUP] 13 [/SUP]



Affiliations
Abstract

Introduction: Multiple SARS-CoV-2 vaccine types are available but the optimal platform for use in pregnancy remains unclear. This study compared humoral and cellular immune responses in blood and breastmilk following COVID-19 vaccination with different vaccine types during pregnancy.
Methods: In a prospective cohort study, pregnant individuals (85 % naïve for COVID-19) received at least one dose of either the adenoviral vector vaccine (AVV) ChadOx1-S (N = 17) or a messenger RNA vaccine (mRNAV) BNT162b2 (N = 42) or mRNA-1273 (N = 5) during pregnancy. Blood samples were taken at different timepoints before and after each vaccine dose, and at delivery. Breastmilk samples were collected up to 12 weeks postpartum. Follow-up continued until 28-35 days after postpartum mRNA booster vaccination (BNT162b2: N = 23; mRNA-1273: N = 25). The primary outcome was comparison of immune responses between the AVV and mRNAV group.
Results: mRNAV recipients showed significantly higher anti-RBD IgG titres, with greater avidity and neutralizing capacity, and stronger S1- and S2-specific CD154 CD4+ T-cell responses up to day 28 after the second vaccine dose. Cord blood from mRNAV recipients had significantly higher anti-RBD IgG and NAb titres at delivery compared to AV vaccinated individuals. After postpartum mRNA booster vaccination, immune responses were comparable between both groups.
Conclusion: mRNA COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy elicited more rapid and robust immune responses compared to AV vaccination. These findings suggest that mRNA vaccines may be preferable for emergency use during pregnancy and support their use in future maternal vaccine development and in pandemic preparedness recommendations.
Clinical trial registry: Clinicaltrials.govidentifier: NCT05618548.

Keywords: COVID-19; Maternal immunization; Pandemic preparedness; Pregnancy; Vaccination; Vaccine platform.

 
Back
Top Bottom