• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Vaccine: Effectiveness of an influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine among Japanese pregnant women: A prospective observational study assessing ant

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine

Available online 18 October 2012

In Press, Uncorrected Proof ? Note to users
Cover image
Effectiveness of an influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine among Japanese pregnant women: A prospective observational study assessing antibody efficacy

Wakaba Fukushimaa, Corresponding author contact information, E-mail the corresponding author,
Satoko Ohfujia,
Masaaki Deguchib, 1,
Kazume Kawabatac,
Hideaki Hatayamaa,
Hideki Yoshidad,
Akiko Maedaa,
Yoshio Hirotaa

a Department of Public Health, Osaka City University Faculty of Medicine, 1-4-3, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8585, Japan
b Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka City Juso Hospital, 2-12-27, Nonaka-kita, Yodogawa-ku, Osaka 532-0034, Japan
c Kawabata Women's Clinic, 1-22-10, Miyakojima-kitadori, Miyakojima-ku, Osaka 534-0014, Japan
d Division of Infectious Disease Control, Osaka City Public Health Office, 1-2-7-1000, Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-0051, Japan

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.10.027, How to Cite or Link Using DOI


Abstract

In order to estimate the effectiveness of an influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine among pregnant women, we prospectively observed 135 Japanese pregnant women who received an influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine during November 2009. We calculated an index of ?antibody efficacy?, in which the medical visits for respiratory illnesses were compared between those with and without post-vaccination hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titer ≥1:40. The product of antibody efficacy and achievement rate is theoretically equivalent to the vaccine effectiveness. Among all subjects, an inverse but non-significant relationship during the epidemic period was observed between post-vaccination HI titer ≥1:40 and medical visits for respiratory illnesses. After stratification by trimester at recruitment, a significant inverse association during the epidemic period was found among subjects in the first or second trimester (antibody efficacy: 91%, vaccine effectiveness: 79%). The influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine administered in the first or second trimester reduced medical visits for respiratory illnesses among Japanese pregnant women.
Highlights

► Effectiveness of an influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine was estimated. ► We prospectively observed 135 Japanese pregnant women. ► Vaccine effectiveness was calculated using an index of ?antibody efficacy?. ► Antibody efficacy was 91% among subjects in the first or second trimester at recruitment. ► The corresponding vaccine effectiveness was estimated to be 79%.


http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X12014739
 
Back
Top Bottom