• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Vaccine . A real-world study evaluating the relative vaccine effectiveness of a cell-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine compared to egg-based qua

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Vaccine


. 2020 Jul 29;S0264-410X(20)30936-1.
doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.07.023. Online ahead of print.
A real-world study evaluating the relative vaccine effectiveness of a cell-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine compared to egg-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine in the US during the 2017-18 influenza season


Victoria Divino[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Girishanthy Krishnarajah[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Stephen I Pelton[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Joaquin Mould-Quevedo[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Vamshi Ruthwik Anupindi[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Mitch DeKoven[SUP] 4 [/SUP], Maarten J Postma[SUP] 5 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Background: Cell-based influenza vaccine manufacturing reduces egg adaptations that can decrease vaccine effectiveness. We evaluated the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of cell-based quadrivalent influenza vaccine (QIVc) compared to standard-dose egg-based quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIVe-SD) against influenza-related and serious respiratory events among subjects 4-64 years of age during the 2017-18 influenza season.
Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using administrative claims data in the US (IQVIA PharMetrics Plus? database). Subjects vaccinated with QIVc or QIVe-SD from 8/2017-1/2018 were identified (date of vaccination termed the index date). Influenza-related hospitalizations/ER visits, all-cause hospitalizations and serious respiratory hospitalizations/ER visits were assessed post-vaccination. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and Poisson regression were used to evaluate the adjusted rVE of QIVc compared to QIVe-SD. In a subgroup analysis, rVE was assessed for several subgroups of interest (4-17, 18-64 and 50-64 years, and subjects with ≥1 high-risk condition). In a secondary economic analysis, annualized all-cause costs over the follow-up were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) and generalized estimating equation (GEE) models.
Results: The study sample comprised 555,538 QIVc recipients and 2,528,524 QIVe-SD recipients. Prior to adjustment, QIVc subjects were older and had higher total costs in the 6-months pre-index. Following IPTW-adjustment and Poisson regression, QIVc was more effective in reducing influenza-related hospitalizations/ER visits, all-cause hospitalizations, and hospitalizations/ER visits related to asthma/COPD/bronchial events and other respiratory events compared to QIVe-SD. Similar trends were generally observed in the subgroup analysis. Following PSM adjustment and GEE regression, QIVe-SD was associated with significantly higher annualized all-cause total costs compared to QIVc, driven by higher costs for outpatient medical services and inpatient hospitalizations.
Conclusions: After adjustment for confounders and selection bias, QIVc reduced influenza-related hospitalizations/ER visits, all-cause hospitalizations, and serious respiratory hospitalizations/ER visits compared to QIVe-SD. QIVc was associated with significantly lower all-cause total costs.

Keywords: Cell-based influenza vaccine; Influenza; Influenza vaccine; Observational studies; Relative vaccine effectiveness; Retrospective studies.
 
Back
Top Bottom