• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Vaccination coverage of general practitioners: a cross-sectional study from Greece

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Public Health. 2020 Jan 27;181:110-113. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.12.012. [Epub ahead of print] [h=1]Vaccination coverage of general practitioners: a cross-sectional study from Greece.[/h]
Kalemaki D[SUP]1[/SUP], Karakonstantis S[SUP]2[/SUP], Galanakis E[SUP]3[/SUP], Lionis C[SUP]4[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]OBJECTIVES:[/h] Vaccination coverage of general practitioners (GPs) is important for their own and for their colleagues' and patients' protection and has been associated with the coverage of the general population. Our study aims to evaluate the vaccination practices of GPs in Crete, Greece.
[h=4]STUDY DESIGN:[/h] Cross-sectional, questionnaire-based survey.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] All practicing GPs in Crete (n = 294) were surveyed either by questionnaires or by phone call. We assessed the vaccination coverage and practices for influenza, measles, hepatitis B, and pertussis (booster Tdap dose) and the reasons for nonvaccination for influenza.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] A total of 260 (88% response rate) GPs participated. Vaccination rates were 56% for influenza (current season), 26% for measles (two doses), 68% for hepatitis B (three doses), and 18% for the booster dose with Tdap. Negligence (47%) and perceived low risk (29.6%) were the most common reasons for nonvaccination for influenza. History of natural measles infection was reported by 169 (65%) GPs, but none of the interviewed 31 provided laboratory confirmation. GPs with self-reported natural measles infection were less vaccinated than their peers (10% vs 55%, P < 0.001). Finally, 23 of 130 (18%) GPs contacted by phone falsely reported vaccination with Tdap in their childhood, when Tdap was not yet available.
[h=4]CONCLUSION:[/h] This study revealed insufficient vaccination rates and misconceptions among GPs that should be the focus of future evidence-based interventions with potential to significantly improve vaccination coverage of GPs and indirectly of their patients.
Copyright ? 2019 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] General practitioners; Hepatitis B; Influenza; Measles; Tdap; Vaccination

PMID: 32000009 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.12.012
 
Back
Top Bottom