• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Use of social network analysis and global sensitivity and uncertainty analyses to better understand an influenza outbreak

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Oncotarget. 2017 Feb 3. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15076. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Use of social network analysis and global sensitivity and uncertainty analyses to better understand an influenza outbreak.[/h] Liu J[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Jiang H[SUP]3[/SUP], Zhang H[SUP]2[/SUP], Guo C[SUP]1[/SUP], Wang L[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Yang J[SUP]2[/SUP], Nie S[SUP]1[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] In the summer of 2014, an influenza A(H3N2) outbreak occurred in Yichang city, Hubei province, China. A retrospective study was conducted to collect and interpret hospital and epidemiological data on it using social network analysis and global sensitivity and uncertainty analyses. Results for degree (χ2=17.6619, P<0.0001) and betweenness(χ2=21.4186, P<0.0001) centrality suggested that the selection of sampling objects were different between traditional epidemiological methods and newer statistical approaches. Clique and network diagrams demonstrated that the outbreak actually consisted of two independent transmission networks. Sensitivity analysis showed that the contact coefficient (k) was the most important factor in the dynamic model. Using uncertainty analysis, we were able to better understand the properties and variations over space and time on the outbreak. We concluded that use of newer approaches were significantly more efficient for managing and controlling infectious diseases outbreaks, as well as saving time and public health resources, and could be widely applied on similar local outbreaks.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] control of infectious diseases; field epidemiology; global sensitivity and uncertainty analyses; social network analysis

PMID: 28177887 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.15076
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher] Free full text
 
Back
Top Bottom