• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Use of Electronic Health Records to Improve Maternal Vaccination

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Womens Health Issues. 2019 Jun 8. pii: S1049-3867(18)30422-5. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2019.04.017. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Use of Electronic Health Records to Improve Maternal Vaccination.[/h] Brewer SE[SUP]1[/SUP], Barnard J[SUP]2[/SUP], Pyrzanowski J[SUP]3[/SUP], O'Leary ST[SUP]2[/SUP], Dempsey AF[SUP]2[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]INTRODUCTION:[/h] Accurate electronic health record (EHR) documentation of maternal vaccination is an essential component of evidence-based strategies to increase vaccination uptake. Within a larger intervention trial, this study assessed the impact of tailored protocols and immunization champions on obstetrics-gynecology practices' EHR documentation of maternal vaccines-including administration, history, and refusals-and sought to understand clinical staff's experience of the barriers and solutions to documentation in the EHR.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] In 2012 and 2014, random samples of obstetric patient charts (N = 275) were reviewed the preintervention and postintervention periods to assess changes in vaccination documentation. In-depth interviews with clinic staff were conducted during and after the intervention to evaluate the experience of clinical providers and staff in using the EHR to document maternal vaccine activities (N = 34 interviews). Analyses were conducted in 2015 and 2016.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] Documentation of any vaccination activities in the EHR for influenza vaccine improved from 27% to 60% (p < .001) and from 13% to 87% (p < .001) for tetanus-diphtheria-acellular-pertussis vaccine. Documentation improvements were largely located in unsearchable notes rather than in searchable fields (52% for influenza, 59% for tetanus-diphtheria-acellular-pertussis). Barriers to EHR documentation reported by clinic staff included perceptions that inputting vaccine information into searchable fields was time consuming and that searchable fields were difficult to use.
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] Existing EHR structured fields do not meet the needs of obstetric providers, posing challenges for maternal immunization. We recommend obstetrics-gynecology practices collaborate with staff to develop effective maternal vaccination documentation protocols, test usability when selecting an EHR, and customize alerts to balance effectively reminding clinical staff against alert fatigue. Further, we recommend that future work address the need for improved maternal vaccination documentation to facilitate quality improvement in obstetrics-gynecology settings.
Copyright ? 2019 Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.


PMID: 31186144 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2019.04.017
 
Back
Top Bottom