• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

US: ICAN Attorneys Ask Supreme Court to Reinstate Stay on OSHA Vaccine Mandate

Emily

Editor, Senior Moderator
https://www.icandecide.org/ican_pre...rt-to-reinstate-stay-on-osha-vaccine-mandate/
ICAN Attorneys Ask Supreme Court to Reinstate Stay on OSHA Vaccine Mandate
Dec 22, 2021, 23:21ET

ICAN’s attorneys submitted an emergency application for a stay to the Supreme Court of the United States asking it to reinstate the stay on OSHA’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate for companies with over 100 employees.

OSHA, at the direction of President Biden, issued its Emergency Technical Standard (ETS) on November 5, 2021 which calls for those employers to mandate vaccination or testing and masking for its employees. On November 12, 2021, the Fifth Circuit stayed the ETS, which means it was not enforceable. In its review of the ETS, the Fifth Circuit concluded that COVID-19 is not the sort of “substance” or “agent” that poses such a “grave danger” as to allow OSHA to take emergency action. The Fifth Circuit further criticized the scope of the ETS, characterizing it as a “one-size-fits-all sledgehammer that makes hardly any attempt to account for differences in workplaces (and workers) that have more than a little bearing on workers’ varying degrees of susceptibility” to the virus. Therefore, the Fifth Circuit concluded that the ETS’s challengers are likely to succeed on the merits and it issued a stay requiring
OSHA to suspend activities related to the implementation and enforcement of the ETS pending subsequent developments in the litigation.

The case was then moved to the Sixth Circuit, where OSHA filed an emergency motion seeking to dissolve the Fifth Circuit’s stay and to allow OSHA to enforce the ETS while the Sixth Circuit made decisions on the merits. On December 17, 2021, after many petitioners including the petitioner represented by ICAN’s attorneys, opposed OSHA’s motion, the Sixth Circuit, in a split 2 to 1 decision, granted OSHA’s motion allowing OSHA to proceed with enforcement of the ETS while the various challenges are pending.

Monday’s filing asked the Supreme Court to correct the Sixth Circuit and re-issue the stay. Justice Kavanaugh has ordered OSHA to respond by December 30, 2021.

Below is an introduction to the emergency motion filed Monday by our attorneys:...
 
Back
Top