• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

US Department of Health and Human Services Adds Layer of Approval Before Employees Can Speak

Re: US Department of Health and Human Services Adds Layer of Approval Before Employees Can Speak

October 4, 2011

Government obstructing access to science data, panel says

snip


The health, environment and energy reporters laid much of the blame for the lack of progress on a ?disturbing? trend toward top-down, politically-motivated control of what certain agencies make accessible to the media that has continued since President Obama took office.

Even the release of relatively apolitical information, the panelists said, has become subject to approval up a high chain of political command. Some agencies can take days, if they take any action at all, to respond to basic media inquiries and interview requests--far too late for reporters on tight deadlines, according to the speakers.

?What we see happening over and over again with [the Department of Health and Human Services] is that you might go through, say, the National Institutes of Health and contact a scientist with a paper out and expect to get it cleared through the press office at the Institute,? said Nancy Shute, the president of the National Association of Science Writers and a contributor to NPR and Scientific American. ?But, instead, the press office there knocks it up to HHS and Katherine Sebelius and it gets sucked into this black hole for something that should never have required this level of review.?

more...

http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=12180
 
Back
Top