• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

US - Dairy cows test positive for H5N1 avian flu in Texas, Kansas, Idaho, Michigan, New Mexico, Ohio, North Carolina, South Dakota, Colorado, Iowa, Mi

Status
Not open for further replies.
hat tip Treyfish

This article quotes an expert who says there have been about 20 total farms with dairy cows exhibiting the syndrome. 4 of the farms also had bird mortality (which are apparently the farms indicated above in this thread).


Bird flu in US dairy: What we know so far plus tips for producers


28-Mar-2024 By Teodora Lyubomirova

We round-up the facts around the HPAI outbreak affecting some US dairy herds, what farmers should do now to bolster biosecurity, and what all this means for milk supply and public health.

HTTPS://WWW.DAIRYREPORTER.COM/ARTICLE/2024/03/28/AVIAN-FLU-IN-US-DAIRY-COWS-KEY-QUESTIONS-ANSWERED
 
Sick Dairy Cows Recovering From HPAI

Avian Influenza on Dairy Farms Leads to More Questions - UPDATE


3/28/2024 | 4:55 PM CDT

By Jennifer Carrico ,

Senior Livestock Editor Tests have confirmed dairy cows at three farms in Texas and one in Kansas have highly pathogenic avian influenza, but veterinarians are unsure why this has happened. The virus hasn't crossed to the bovine species previously. So far, the impact of avian flu on dairy prices has been negligible or nonexistent.

Editor's Note: This story was updated with additional information at 4:55 p.m., March 28.

**

snip

FOUND IN EIGHT COWS, TWO FARMS

USDA's report to the World Organization for Animal Health shows HPAI was found in eight cows at a farm near Dalhart area in Hartley County, Texas. The second case involved one cow near the Liberal area in Seward County, Kansas.

This report also showed that no markers of mammalian adaptation nor antiviral resistance were observed. Additional testing continues as well as viral genome sequencing to help better understand the cases and which strain of HPAI the cows have.


"The first detection of HPAI in dairy cattle in Texas and Kansas underscores the importance of adherence to biosecurity measures, vigilance in monitoring for disease, and immediately involving your veterinarian when something seems 'off,'" Rena Carlson, veterinarian and president of the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA), said in a news release.

snip

"About 10% of the cows at these dairies have become sick and are put in the hospital pens. None have died from the virus, and for the most part, cows are back into production after a couple weeks," he said.


snip

"The fact that cows do not need to be culled and will overcome it in a rather short period has not impacted the immediate outlook for milk and product prices," he said Thursday afternoon.

snip

"As of now, the USDA is not planning to quarantine dairy herds with HPAI, but this is an evolving situation, and we will keep you up to date on any changes."

snip

It was also advised to keep new animals isolated on the farm or in an off-farm facility to be sure they are healthy before being introduced to the main herd. While this virus is thought to be transmitted from bird to cow, they are unsure if it can be transmitted from cow to cow.

Monitoring the situation continues to be important as migratory birds make their way to spring and summer landing areas. Many states have dealt with HPAI in the poultry industry for the past few years. There have been no cases found in beef cattle, according to Jardon. Additional testing is underway on the positive dairy cows, including genome sequencing, to characterize the HPAI strain associated with these illnesses.

"While treatment is directed through herd veterinarians, it appears that these dairy cows need mostly supportive care with additional fluids. If a secondary infection is found, antibiotics would possibly be used, but all animals are cleared of infection prior to milk being considered safe for the food supply," Jardon said.

snip

As more information is found on the outbreak, officials will make further recommendations to livestock producers and consumers.:tiphat: https://www.dtnpf.com/agriculture/w.../2024/03/27/avian-influenza-dairy-farms-leads
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The need to act before it is too late


28 March, 2024

snip

Previously thought to be immune, herbivorous mammals are now displaying prominent clinical symptoms (fever, decreased milk production) and a concerning morbidity rate (~10%) in herds, primarily affecting mature cows.

snip

Furthermore, sequencing of the virus from infected cows doesn't reveal mutations typically associated with adaptation to mammals. This raises the question: could undiagnosed cases have already occurred? Serological surveys could be crucial here.

Additionally, policy questions emerge regarding the lack of culling for these infected herds. Perhaps this will prompt a shift away from the "anti-vaccine policy" mentality and towards controlled management strategies. The goal should be to reduce and ultimately control the AI virus before it becomes too late.


Nati Elkin
​:tiphat: https://www.poultrymed.com/Focus_On
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HPAI found in cows at a Cassia County dairy, officials say

The Idaho State Department of Agriculture said it's the first reported case in livestock of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) in Idaho.​ HPAI found in cows at a Cassia County dairy, officials say
Author: KTVB Staff
Published: 7:11 PM MDT March 28, 2024
Updated: 7:11 PM MDT March 28, 2024

BOISE, Idaho — The Idaho State Department of Agriculture (ISDA) reported on Thursday the first case of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) in Idaho livestock.

The ISDA said in a news release that the disease, also known as the bird flu, was found in cows at a Cassia County dairy. Officials stated the dairy imported cattle from another state which had confirmed cases of the illness.


ISDA believes the disease was passed from cow to cow after contracting the virus from infected birds.

"At this stage, there is no concern about the safety of the commercial milk supply or that this circumstance poses a risk to consumer.....:tiphat:

https://www.ktvb.com/article/news/l...ials/277-66dd4a03-d4a8-44fc-b56f-69746c084d7b
 
HPAI detected in Idaho dairy herd

By News Team

today at 5:23 PM
Published March 28, 2024 5:26 PM

BOISE, Idaho (KIFI) - The Idaho State Department of Agriculture (ISDA) identified Thursday highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) in a Cassia County dairy cattle operation.

These are the first cases of HPAI in a livestock operation in Idaho. The affected facility recently imported cattle from another state that has identified cases of HPAI in cattle, which suggests the virus may be transmitted from cow-to-cow, in addition to previous reports indicating cattle were acquiring the virus from infected birds.

The primary concern with this diagnosis is on-dairy production losses, as the disease has been associated with decreased milk production.

Symptoms of HPAI i.....:tiphat:

https://localnews8.com/news/2024/03/28/hpai-detected-in-idaho-dairy-herd/
 
Idaho State Department of Agriculture

HPAI Detection in Idaho Dairy Herd

Boise, Idaho – The Idaho State Department of Agriculture (ISDA) identified today highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) in a Cassia County dairy cattle operation.

These are the first cases of HPAI in a livestock operation in Idaho. The affected facility recently imported cattle from another state that has identified cases of HPAI in cattle, which suggests the virus may be transmitted from cow-to-cow, in addition to previous reports indicating cattle were acquiring the virus from infected birds.

The primary concern with this diagnosis is on-farm production losses, as the disease has been associated with decreased milk production.

Symptoms of HPAI in cattle include:
  • Drop in milk production
  • Loss of appetite
  • Changes in manure consistency
  • Thickened or colostrum-like milk
  • Low-grade fever
At this stage, there is no concern about the safety of the commercial milk supply or that this circumstance poses a risk to consumer health. The pasteurization process of heating milk to a high temperature ensures milk and dairy products can be consumed safely.

The ISDA encourages all dairy producers to closely monitor their herd and contact their local veterinarian immediately if cattle appear to show symptoms. HPAI is a mandatory reportable disease, and any Idaho veterinarians who suspect cases of HPAI in livestock should immediately report it to ISDA at 208-332-8540 or complete the HPAI Livestock Screen at agri.idaho.gov/main/animals/hpai/.

It is recommended to enhance biosecurity measures across all livestock facilities in Idaho. Biosecurity practices can be found at agri.idaho.gov/main/animals/hpai/.

For decades, Idaho has worked diligently to implement industry-driven programs that mitigate the transmission of diseases that cause on-farm economic losses. ISDA’s response to the detection of HPAI in cattle aligns with standard ISDA animal disease detection procedure.

This is an evolving situation, and additional updates will be provided by ISDA as they become available.

For more information visit agri.idaho.gov/main/animals/hpai/ or contact ISDA Animal Industries Division (208) 332-8540.

Media Inquiries

Sydney Kennedy

media@isda.idaho.gov

(208) 332-8507

https://agri.idaho.gov/main/hpai-detection-in-idaho-dairy-herd/
 
From the Friedrich-Loeffler-Institute. Link in comments...


Infections with highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses (HPAIV) of subtype H5N1 in ruminants in the U.S.


03/27/2024

Isolated cases of HPAIV H5N1 infections in dairy cows have been reported from three U.S. states (Texas, New Mexico and Kansas). Individual, mainly older cows in one herd apparently showed an acute drop in milk production of up to 20 per cent. So far, there is no precise information on further clinical symptoms. The virus was detected in the milk of the animals, in some cases with high virus loads, and in at least one case also from a nasal swab. HPAIV-infected wild birds were found dead in the area of the affected farms, so that entry points via indirect contact with wild birds (e.g. drinking water, feed) are suspected. Whether there could also have been transmission between cows or indirectly, e.g. via contaminated milking utensils, is currently being intensively investigated. The virus detected is a genotype of HPAIV H5N1 of clade 2.3.4.4b, which is known in the USA but has not been dominant to date. The U.S. authorities consider the pasteurisation of milk to be a sufficient inactivation process and do not believe it poses a risk to human health. The precautionary killing of animals in affected herds is currently not planned.

Furthermore, a case of a dead newborn goat with an HPAIV H5N1 infection has been reported in the USA. The animal came from a farm in Minnesota where the goats had contact with free-range poultry in a small flock. Several newborn kids died there, but HPAIV H5N1 was only detected in one animal. The infections occurred several days or weeks ago, as an HPAIV infection was not part of the expected pathogen spectrum of the cases described and corresponding investigations were only initiated late.

The reports are cause for extended and intensified investigations of ruminants in the U.S.A. However, they should also be seen as an exclamation mark in this country: Transmissions of HPAIV H5N1 to mammals in Germany have so far been limited to individual wild carnivores (especially foxes) and a few harbour seals or grey seals. However, it cannot be ruled out that farm animals (ruminants, pigs) could also be susceptible under certain conditions. Livestock owners are therefore advised to remain vigilant and be aware of the risks if their animals come into contact with areas to which waterfowl also have access. In addition, further investigations should be initiated in the event of unclear and frequent cases of illness, which should then also include HPAIV H5.

The risk of human infection with HPAIV H5N1 viruses of clade 2.3.4.4b is still classified as low (ECDC).

Sources:

USDA (2024) Federal and State Veterinary, Public Health Agencies Share Update on HPAIDetection in Kansas, Texas Dairy Herds, from March 25, 2024

Cohen, J. (2024). Bird flu discovered in U.S. dairy cows is ‘disturbing’. Science. DOI: 10.1126/science.z9sk33v

EFSA (2024). Avian influenza overview December 2023–March 2024. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8754​:tiphat: Www. FLI.de
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HPAI detected in Idaho dairy cattle


Find follows diagnoses in New Mexico, Texas and Kansas.

Farm Press Staff
March 29, 2024

Idaho officials say an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza occurred at a dairy cattle operation in Cassia County, which abuts the Utah state line....Officials say the virus may be transmitted from cow-to-cow as well as from infected birds that come in contact with cows.

​​​​​​While HPAI has devastated poultry flocks across the country in recent years, the death loss in cattle is very low and it doesn’t impact all cows in the herd, Kansas State University dairy specialist Mike Brouk has said.

“The highest percentage affected in the herd I’ve seen is about 20& of the animals impacted, lowest is 5%,” Brouk told a dairy association gathering earlier this month....
​:tiphat: https://www.farmprogress.com/livestock-and-dairy/hpai-detected-in-idaho-dairy-cattle
 
Testing cattle for highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI)

Thursday, March 28, 2024



On March 25, 2024, the USDA, FDA and CDC announced detection of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 in dairy cattle in TX and KS. This is an evolving situation, currently thought to be spread via wild birds to cattle. Clinical signs have been limited to adult lactating cattle, with the primary sign being a pronounced drop in milk production, a decrease in appetite and rumination, mild respiratory signs, low grade fever, and thickened "colostrum-like" milk. Some cattle have dark tarry stools while others have diarrhea. Milk and nasal swabs from affected cattle have both tested positive for H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b, the clade currently circulating in wild birds in the US since 2022. Some of the affected farms have also reported high numbers of dead wild birds. The Animal Health Diagnostic Center (AHDC), as a National Animal Health Laboratory Network (NAHLN) laboratory, tests avian and mammalian samples for HPAI by PCR, and forwards all non-negative samples to the National Veterinary Services Laboratories (NVSL) in Ames, Iowa, for confirmation. Currently, there are no quarantines or other regulatory restrictions for detection of HPAI in cattle.

Veterinarians are encouraged to contact the AHDC's Veterinary Support Services to discuss testing options as well as costs with a diagnostic veterinarian. Subsidized testing is available for cases meeting criteria established by the USDA. Please call 607-253-3900 or email vetsupport@cornell.edu for a consultation. Veterinarians in the State of New York are required to contact the New York Department of Agriculture and Markets (518-457-3502) to get approval before submitting samples for testing. Other states may have different polices and veterinarians should inquire with their State Veterinarian's office before submitting samples. When submitting samples, official premises ID must be included in the submission form. Contact the State Veterinarian's office to obtain a premises ID if the farm does not have one.

A sample list is provided here for suspect cattle: Ante-mortem samples from a single farm, listed in order of priority:
  1. Milk
    • Individual cow: 5-10 ml per cow, from 10 affected and 10 unaffected cows (do not pool from different cows)
    • Bulk tank: 150 ml per tank
  2. Nasal swab in plain red top tube with 0.5 ml saline, or viral transport media from 10 affected and 10 unaffected cattle
  3. Serum from 10 affected and 10 unaffected cattle
  4. 3-5 dead birds found at affected premises
  5. Dead small mammals (for example, farm cats) from premises, up to 3 animals
Post-mortem:
  1. Milk and mammary tissue
  2. Lymph nodes (supramammary and other)
  3. Lung
  4. Spleen
  5. Diaphragm
  6. Optional: full set of fresh and fixed tissues ideally
​:tiphat: https://www.vet.cornell.edu/animal-... March 25, 2024, the,via wild birds to cattle
 
USDA, FDA and CDC Share Update on HPAI Detections in Dairy Cattle

Published: Mar 29, 2024

WASHINGTON, March 29, 2024 – The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as well as state veterinary and public health officials, are continuing to investigate an illness among dairy cows that is causing decreased lactation, low appetite, and other symptoms.

On Monday, March 25, the agencies confirmed the detection of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) in two dairy herds in Texas and two dairy herds in Kansas that had cattle exhibiting these symptoms.

USDA’s National Veterinary Services Laboratories (NVSL) has now also confirmed the presence of HPAI in a Michigan dairy herd that had recently received cows from Texas. Presumptive positive test results have also been received for additional herds in New Mexico, Idaho, and Texas; USDA will share updates if those tests are confirmed positive by NVSL. Federal and state agencies continue to conduct additional testing in swabs from sick animals and in unpasteurized clinical milk samples from sick animals, as well as viral genome sequencing, to assess whether HPAI or another unrelated illness may be underlying any symptoms

The NVSL has also confirmed that the strain of the virus found in Michigan is very similar to the strain confirmed in Texas and Kansas that appears to have been introduced by wild birds (H5N1, Eurasian lineage goose/Guangdong clade 2.3.4.4b). Initial testing has not found changes to the virus that would make it more transmissible to humans. While cases among humans in direct contact with infected animals are possible, this indicates that the current risk to the public remains low.

Spread of symptoms among the Michigan herd also indicates that HPAI transmission between cattle cannot be ruled out; USDA and partners continue to monitor this closely and have advised veterinarians and producers to practice good biosecurity, test animals before necessary movements, minimize animal movements, and isolate sick cattle from the herd. Among the dairies whose herds are exhibiting symptoms, the affected animals have recovered after isolation with little to no associated mortality reported.

There continues to be no concern about the safety of the commercial milk supply because products are pasteurized before entering the market, or that this circumstance poses a risk to consumer health. Dairies are required to send only milk from healthy animals into processing for human consumption; milk from impacted animals is being diverted or destroyed so that it does not enter the human food supply. In addition, pasteurization has continually proven to inactivate bacteria and viruses, like influenza, in milk. Pasteurization is required for any milk entering interstate commerce for human consumption. FDA’s longstanding position is that unpasteurized, raw milk can harbor dangerous microorganisms that can pose serious health risks to consumers, and FDA is reminding consumers of the risks associated with raw milk consumption in light of the HPAI detections.

Because of the limited information available about the transmission of HPAI in raw milk, the FDA recommends that industry does not manufacture or sell raw milk or raw/unpasteurized milk cheese products made with milk from cows showing symptoms of illness, including those infected with avian influenza or exposed to those infected with avian influenza. At this time, the FDA is not aware that any milk or food product from symptomatic cows is entering interstate commerce. Furthermore, if milk from cows showing symptoms of illness, including those infected with avian influenza or exposed to those infected with avian influenza is intended to be used to feed calves, FDA strongly encourages that it be heat treated to kill harmful bacteria or viruses, such as influenza, before calf feeding. Food safety information from FDA, including information about the sale and consumption of raw milk, can be found here.

Milk loss resulting from symptomatic cattle to date is too limited to have a major impact on supply and there should be no impact on the price of milk or other dairy products. Further, the U.S. typically has a more than sufficient milk supply in the spring months due to seasonally higher production.

Federal agencies are also working with state and industry partners to encourage farmers and veterinarians to report cattle illnesses quickly so that we can monitor potential additional cases and minimize the impact and risk to farmers, farmworkers, consumers and other animals. Producers are urged to work with their veterinarian to report cattle illnesses quickly and practice enhanced biosecurity measures. More information on biosecurity measures can be found here.


https://www.aphis.usda.gov/news/age...cdc-share-update-hpai-detections-dairy-cattle
 
Last edited:
Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Detected in Michigan Dairy Herd

March 29, 2024

Michigan herd is linked to the affected cattle in Texas; producers are strongly encouraged to contact their veterinarian about any animal health concern

LANSING, MI – Today, Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development (MDARD) Director Tim Boring announced the detection of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) in a dairy herd from Montcalm County. The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s National Veterinary Services Laboratories has confirmed this detection.

Further testing and investigation by state and federal officials have revealed the source of infection. The farm recently received cattle from an affected premises in Texas before that herd showed any sign of disease. When the cattle were moved from Texas to Michigan, the cattle were not symptomatic and did not appear ill. As this national situation continues to develop, it is essential for all producers to contact their veterinarian if they have any concerns regarding the health of their animals, regardless of species.

"We have well-trained staff responding to this situation and I have the utmost confidence in our team. We will continue working with our local, state, and national partners to protect animal and public health," said Director Boring. "Our highest priorities at MDARD remain protecting our food supply and ensuring animal health. As this situation evolves, we will provide critical updates to producers, industry, and all Michiganders.”

“This case does reflect a lot of what is already known about this virus—namely, that it is highly contagious, it continues to be primarily spread by wild birds and contact with infected animals, and mammals can contract the virus,” said State Veterinarian Dr. Nora Wineland, DVM, MS, DACVPM. “MDARD is working diligently and in close collaboration with government partners, producer groups, and Michigan dairy farmers to address the situation and prevent the spread of disease. As more is learned, it is vitally important for producers to work with their veterinarian and isolate sick animals from others, minimize the number of visitors to their farms, prevent contact between their animals and wildlife, and continue to vigilantly monitor the health of their animals.”

HPAI is a highly contagious virus that can be spread directly by infected wild birds/animals or indirectly through any item that has been exposed to the virus—such as equipment, feed, or the clothing and shoes of caretakers. The virus has been detected in various species of mammals—presumably after the animals come into contact with infected birds. To limit the spread of the disease, the affected premises voluntarily stopped movement.

Producers who have concerns about the health of their animals and/or questions regarding how to improve the measures they take to protect animal health on their farm should contact their veterinarian. Also, if cattle producers notice decreased lactation, low appetite, and/or other symptoms in their herds, please contact your veterinarian to determine the next appropriate steps to take.

Analysis of the virus from this case and the other cases of affected cattle has not shown any significant new adaptation to make the virus more transmissible between mammals. Therefore, the public health risk associated with HPAI remains low.

According to the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease and Prevention, the commercial milk supply remains safe due to both federal animal health requirements and pasteurization.

If anyone suspects the presence of HPAI or any other reportable animal disease in their domestic animals, please contact MDARD immediately at 800-292-3939 (daytime) or 517-373-0440 (after-hours).

For more information on the detections of HPAI in cattle, please visit the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s website.

###
...​

https://www.michigan.gov/mdard/abou...ian-influenza-detected-in-michigan-dairy-herd
 
image.png - Click image for larger version  Name:	image.png Views:	2 Size:	38.9 KB ID:	987956


Montcalm County, Michigan
/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montcalm_County,_Michigan


---------------------------------
Dairy cows from commercial Michigan farm infected with bird flu

Published: Mar. 29, 2024, 5:26 p.m.

By Rose White | rwhite@mlive.com

An avian flu that has killed millions of birds over the past two years was confirmed in a herd of Montcalm County dairy cows.
...
The infection stems from a herd of Texas cattle that were brought to a Michigan commercial farm on March 7. State Veterinarian Nora Wineland said the cattle were “perfectly healthy” at the time and passed all veterinary inspections. When the first animal got sick on March 20, samples were submitted to the state lab.

Results confirmed Tuesday, March 26 it was the highly pathogenic avian flu.
Further testing established it came from Texas.
...
“The whole genome sequence has been looked at by both us on the animal health side as well as our colleagues on the public health side,” Wineland said. “They say they are not seeing any changes in the whole genome sequence to indicate that it is any more a threat to mammals.”

MDARD did not detail how many Michigan cows were affected.
...
Federal and state agencies are doing additional testing for the bird flu and conducting genome sequencing of infected animals.

“We’re learning more about this virus and what caused it to get into cattle after more than two years of not seeing that,” Wineland said.
...

https://www.mlive.com/public-intere...ial-michigan-farm-infected-with-bird-flu.html
 
Bird flu spreads to dairy cows in Idaho, Michigan and New Mexico


By Lena H. Sun
Updated March 29, 2024 at 10:15 p.m. EDT
|PublishedMarch 29, 2024 at 7:32 p.m. EDT​



A highly virulent bird flu first detected in dairy cows in Texas and Kansas this week has spread to additional herds, bringing the number of affected states to five and adding evidence the virus may be spreading cow-to-cow. The strain has been confirmed in Michigan, and presumptive positive tests have been reported from Idaho and New Mexico, federal officials said Friday.

Earlier in the day, the U.S. Department of Agriculture reported incorrectly that presumptive positive tests had also been found in Ohio…..

While cases among humans in direct contact with infected animals are possible, this indicates that the current risk to the public remains low,” the agency statement said.​..


But in an interview, state veterinarian Scott Leibsle said avian flu was detected in the Idaho cattle after the farm imported cows from a Texas herd that had shown symptoms ofHPAI.

“Cow-to-cow transmission is definitely playing a role in how this disease progresses. To what extent, we don’t know yet,” Leibsle said.
It’s clear that infected wild birds spread the disease to herds in Texas and Kansas, he said. “But the herd of cattle that came up from Texas to Idaho, the birds didn’t follow,” the state veterinarian said.
​….
:tiphat: https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/2024/03/29/bird-flu-cows/​
 

Summary

The purpose of this guidance is to outline CDC’s recommendations for preventing exposures to highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) A(H5N1) viruses, infection prevention and control measures including the use of personal protective equipment, testing, antiviral treatment, patient investigations, monitoring of exposed persons, including persons exposed to sick or dead wild and domesticated animals and livestock with suspected or confirmed infection with highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) A(H5N1) virus, and antiviral chemoprophylaxis of exposed persons. These recommendations are based on information available as of March 2024 and will be updated as needed when new information becomes available.

Background

Although human infections with HPAI A(H5N1) virus are rare, having unprotected exposure to any infected animal or to an environment in which infected birds or other animals are or have been present can pose a risk of infection. Therefore, people with work or recreational exposures to H5N1 virus-infected animals may be at increased risk of infection and should follow recommended precautions.

The panzootic of HPAI A(H5N1) viruses in wild birds has resulted in outbreaks among commercial poultry, backyard bird flocks, and spread to infect wild terrestrial and marine mammals, as well as domesticated animals. Sporadic human infections with HPAI A(H5N1) virus have been reported in 23 countries since 1997 with a case fatality proportion of >50%, but only a small number of H5N1 cases have been reported in humans since 2022. Most human infections with H5N1 virus have occurred after unprotected exposures to sick or dead infected poultry. There is no evidence of sustained human-to-human H5N1 virus transmission, and limited, non-sustained human-to-human H5N1 virus transmission has not been reported worldwide since 2007.

Influenza A viruses infect the respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts of birds causing birds to shed the virus in their saliva, mucous, and feces. Influenza A viruses can also infect the respiratory tract of mammals and cause systemic infection in other organ tissues. Human infections with avian influenza A viruses can happen when enough virus gets into a person’s eyes, nose, or mouth or is inhaled. People with close or prolonged unprotected contact with infected birds or animals or their contaminated environments are at greater risk of infection. Illnesses in people from HPAI A(H5N1) virus infections have ranged from mild (e.g., upper respiratory symptoms) to severe illness (e.g., pneumonia, multi-organ failure) resulting in death.

Since 2022, many different wild bird species have been reported with HPAI A(H5N1) virus infection, including terrestrial, seabird, shorebird, and migratory species. In the United States, HPAI A(H5N1) virus detections in wild birds have been reported in 50 states or territories, and outbreaks in commercial poultry or backyard bird flocks associated with high mortality have been reported in 48 states since February 2022.

A wide range of terrestrial and marine mammals have been reported with HPAI A(H5N1) virus infection in multiple countries, typically resulting in neurologic signs of disease and death. HPAI A(H5N1) virus infection has been reported in wild mammals such as foxes, bears, seals, and sea lions, and in domesticated animals, including pets such as cats and dogs, farmed mink and foxes, and livestock such as goats and cows. In the United States, HPAI A(H5N1) virus detections in mammals have been reported in more than 20 states.

At this time, CDC considers the human health risk to the U.S. public from HPAI A(H5N1) viruses to be low; however, people with close or prolonged, unprotected exposures to infected birds or other animals, or to environments contaminated by infected birds or other animals, are at greater risk of infection. CDC considers HPAI A(H5N1) viruses to have the potential to cause severe disease in infected humans and recommends the following:

Recommendations for the Public

People should avoid unprotected (not using respiratory or eye protection) exposures to sick or dead animals including wild birds, poultry, other domesticated birds, and other wild or domesticated animals, as well as with animal feces, litter, or materials contaminated by birds or other animals with suspected or confirmed HPAI A(H5N1) virus infection. People should not prepare or eat uncooked or undercooked food or related uncooked food products, such as unpasteurized (raw) milk, or raw cheeses, from animals with suspected or confirmed HPAI A(H5N1) virus infection (avian influenza or bird flu).


Personal protective equipment (PPE) should be worn when in direct or close contact (within about six feet) with sick or dead animals including poultry, wild birds, backyard bird flocks, or other animals, animal feces, litter, or materials potentially contaminated with HPAI A(H5N1) viruses. PPE includes a properly fitted unvented or indirectly vented safety goggles, disposable gloves, boots or boot covers, a NIOSH-Approved particulate respirator (e.g., N95® filtering facepiece respirator, ideally fit-tested), disposable fluid-resistant coveralls, and disposable head cover or hair cover.

People exposed to HPAI A(H5N1)-virus infected birds or other animals (including people wearing recommended PPE) should monitor themselves for new respiratory illness symptoms, including conjunctivitis (eye redness), beginning after their first exposure and for 10 days after their last exposure. Influenza antiviral post-exposure prophylaxis may be considered to prevent infection, particularly in those who had unprotected exposure to HPAI A(H5N1)-virus infected birds or other animals (see below). Persons who develop any illness symptoms after exposure to HPAI A(H5N1) virus infected birds or other animals should seek prompt medical evaluation for possible influenza testing and antiviral treatment by their clinician or public health department. Symptomatic persons should isolate away from others, including household members, except for seeking medical evaluation until it is determined that they do not have HPAI A(H5N1) virus infection.
Recommendations for Farmers; Poultry, Backyard Bird Flock, and Livestock Owners; and Worker Protection

To reduce the risk of HPAI A(H5N1) virus infection, poultry farmers and poultry workers, backyard bird flock owners, livestock farmers and workers, veterinarians and veterinary staff, and responders should avoid unprotected direct physical contact or close exposure with sick or dead birds or other animals, carcasses, feces, milk, or litter from sick birds or other animals potentially infected or confirmed to be infected with HPAI A(H5N1) virus.
Farmers, workers, and responders should wear recommended PPE such as an N95 filtering facepiece respirator, eye protection, and gloves, and perform thorough hand washing after contact. (e.g., see: PPE recommended for poultry workers) when in direct contact with sick or dead birds or other animals, carcasses, feces, or litter from potentially infected birds or other animals, and when going into any buildings with or that have had sick or dead birds or other animals, carcasses, feces, or litter from potentially infected birds or other animals. Workers should receive training on and demonstrate an understanding of when to use PPE; what PPE is necessary; how to properly put on, use, take off, dispose of, and maintain PPE; and PPE limitations. Employers subject to Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations should comply with applicable standards as highlighted on the OSHA Avian Influenza – Standards page.

Recommendations for Clinicians

Clinicians should consider the possibility of HPAI A(H5N1) virus infection in persons showing signs or symptoms of acute respiratory illness who have relevant exposure history. See: Brief summary for Clinicians. This includes persons who have had contact with potentially infected sick or dead birds, livestock, or other animals within the week before symptom onset (e.g., handling, slaughtering, defeathering, butchering, culling, preparing for consumption or consuming uncooked or undercooked food or related uncooked food products, including unpasteurized (raw) milk or other unpasteurized dairy products), direct contact with water or surfaces contaminated with feces, unpasteurized (raw) milk or unpasteurized dairy products, or parts (carcasses, internal organs, etc.) of potentially infected animals; and persons who have had prolonged exposure to potentially infected birds or other animals in a confined space. Clinicians should contact the state public health department to arrange testing for influenza A(H5N1) virus, collect recommended respiratory specimens (see below) using PPE, consider starting empiric antiviral treatment (see below), and encourage the patient to isolate at home away from their household members and not go to work or school until it is determined they do not have avian influenza A virus infection. Testing for other potential causes of acute respiratory illness should also be considered depending upon the local epidemiology of circulating respiratory viruses, including SARS-CoV-2.

Recommendations for State Health Departments

State health department officials should investigate potential human cases of HPAI A(H5N1) virus infection as described below and should notify CDC within 24 hours of identifying a case under investigation. Rapid detection and characterization of novel influenza A viruses in humans remain critical components of national efforts to prevent further cases, to allow for evaluation of clinical illness associated with them, and to assess the ability of these viruses to spread from human to human. State Health Department officials, including the State Public Health Veterinarian, should collaborate with State Department of Agriculture and State Wildlife officials using a One Health approach when relevant to investigate suspected HPAI A(H5N1) infections in people linked with animals.

Recommendations for Surveillance and Testing

People exposed to HPAI A(H5N1)-infected birds or other animals (including people wearing recommended PPE) should be monitored for signs and symptoms of acute respiratory illness beginning after their first exposure and for 10 days after their last exposure.
Patients who meet Epidemiologic criteria AND either Clinical OR Public Health Response criteria below should be tested for HPAI A(H5N1) virus infection by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay using H5-specific primers and probes at your state or local public health department.

Epidemiological Criteria

Persons with recent exposure (within 10 days) to HPAI A(H5N1) virus through one of the following:

  • Exposure to HPAI A(H5N1) virus infected birds or other animals defined as follows:

    • Close exposure (within six feet) to birds or other animals, with confirmed avian influenza A(H5N1) virus infection. Bird or other animal exposures can include, but are not limited to handling, slaughtering, defeathering, butchering, culling, or preparing birds or other animals for consumption, or consuming uncooked or undercooked food or related uncooked food products, including unpasteurized (raw) milk,
OR
Direct contact with surfaces contaminated with feces, unpasteurized (raw) milk or other unpasteurized dairy products, or bird or animal parts (e.g., carcasses, internal organs) from infected birds or other animals
OR

    • Visiting a live bird market with confirmed bird infections or associated with a case of human infection with HPAI A(H5N1) virus.
    • Exposure to an infected person – Close (within six feet) unprotected (without use of respiratory and eye protection) exposure to a person who is a confirmed, probable, or symptomatic suspected case of human infection with HPAI A(H5N1) virus (e.g., in a household or healthcare facility).
    • Laboratory exposure (unprotected exposure to HPAI A(H5N1) virus in a laboratory)
Clinical Criteria

Persons with signs and symptoms consistent with acute upper or lower respiratory tract infection, or complications of acute respiratory illness without an identified cause. In addition, gastrointestinal symptoms such as diarrhea are often reported with HPAI A(H5N1) virus infection. Examples include but are not limited to:

  • Mild illness (e.g., cough, sore throat, eye redness or eye discharge such as conjunctivitis, fever or feeling feverish, rhinorrhea, fatigue, myalgia, arthralgia, headache)
  • Moderate to severe illness: (e.g., shortness of breath or difficulty breathing, altered mental status, seizures)
  • Complications: pneumonia, respiratory failure, acute respiratory distress syndrome, multi-organ failure (respiratory and kidney failure), sepsis, meningoencephalitis
Public Health Response Criteria

Testing of asymptomatic persons for HPAI A(H5N1) virus infection is not routinely recommended. As part of public health investigations, asymptomatic persons, such as close contacts of a confirmed case of HPAI A(H5N1) virus infection, might be tested after consultation with CDC.

Preferred Clinical Specimens

For persons with suspected HPAI A(H5N1) virus infection,
the following specimens should be collected as soon as possible after illness onset or when deemed necessary: a nasopharyngeal swab and a nasal swab combined with an oropharyngeal swab (e.g., two swabs combined into one viral transport media vial). The nasopharyngeal swab and the combined nasal-throat swabs should be tested separately. If these specimens cannot be collected, a single nasal or oropharyngeal swab is acceptable. If the person has conjunctivitis (with or without respiratory symptoms), both a conjunctival swab and nasopharyngeal swab should be collected. Patients with severe respiratory disease also should have lower respiratory tract specimens (e.g., an endotracheal aspirate or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid) collected, if possible. For severely ill persons, multiple respiratory tract specimens from different sites should be obtained to increase the potential for HPAI A(H5N1) virus detection.

Recommendations for Infection Prevention and Control

Standard, contact, and airborne precautions are recommended for patients presenting for medical care or evaluation who have illness consistent with influenza and recent exposure to birds or other animals potentially infected with HPAI A(H5N1) virus. For additional guidance on infection prevention and control precautions for patients who might be infected with HPAI A(H5N1) virus, please refer to
guidance for infections with novel influenza A viruses associated with severe disease.

Recommendations for Influenza Antiviral Treatment and Chemoprophylaxis

Treating Symptomatic Persons with Bird or Other Animal Exposures

Outpatients meeting epidemiologic exposure criteria who develop signs and symptoms compatible with influenza should be referred for prompt medical evaluation, testing, and empiric initiation of antiviral treatment with oseltamivir as soon as possible. Clinical benefit is greatest when antiviral treatment is administered early, especially within 48 hours of illness onset.

Hospitalized patients who are confirmed, probable, or suspected cases of human infection with HPAI A(H5N1) virus, regardless of time since illness onset are recommended to initiate antiviral treatment with oral or enterically administered oseltamivir as soon as possible. Antiviral treatment should not be delayed while waiting for laboratory testing results.

For detailed guidance on dosing and treatment duration, please see
Interim Guidance of the Use of Antiviral Medications for the Treatment of Human Infection with Novel Influenza A Viruses Associated with Severe Human Disease.

Chemoprophylaxis of Persons with Exposure to HPAI A(H5N1) Virus: Chemoprophylaxis with influenza antiviral medications can be considered for any person meeting epidemiologic exposure criteria. Decisions to initiate post-exposure antiviral chemoprophylaxis should be based on clinical judgment, with consideration given to the type of exposure, duration of exposure, time since exposure, and known infection status of the birds or animals the person was exposed to.

Antiviral chemoprophylaxis is not routinely recommended for personnel who used proper PPE and experienced no breaches while handling sick or potentially infected birds or other animals or decontaminating infected environments (including animal disposal).

If antiviral chemoprophylaxis is initiated, oseltamivir treatment dosing (one dose twice daily) is recommended instead of the antiviral chemoprophylaxis regimen for seasonal influenza. For specific dosage recommendations for treatment by age group, please see
Influenza Antiviral Medications: Summary for Clinicians. Physicians should consult the manufacturer’s package insert for dosing, limitations of populations studied, contraindications, and adverse effects. If exposure was time-limited and not ongoing, five days of medication (one dose twice daily) from the last known exposure is recommended.

Monitoring and Antiviral Chemoprophylaxis of Close Contacts of Persons with HPAI A(H5N1) virus infection: Recommendations for monitoring and chemoprophylaxis of close contacts of infected persons are different than those that apply to persons who meet bird or other animal exposure criteria. Post-exposure prophylaxis of close contacts of a person with HPAI A(H5N1) virus infection is recommended with oseltamivir twice daily (treatment dosing) instead of the once daily pre-exposure prophylaxis dosing. For detailed guidance, please see
Interim Guidance on Follow-up of Close Contacts of Persons Infected with Novel Influenza A Viruses and Use of Antiviral Medications for Chemoprophylaxis.

Vaccination

No human vaccines for prevention of HPAI A(H5N1) virus infection are currently available in the United States. Seasonal influenza vaccines do not provide any protection against human infection with HPAI A(H5N1) viruses.


Last Reviewed: March 29, 2024
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Questions and Answers Regarding Milk Safety During Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) Outbreaks
  • Content current as of:
    03/29/2024
  • Regulated Product(s)
    • Food & Beverages
    • Milk/Milk Product

March 29, 2024

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is closely working with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and state partners to investigate an illness among older dairy cows in Texas, Kansas, and Michigan that is causing decreased lactation, low appetite, and other symptoms.

As of Friday, March 29, the agencies confirmed the detection of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) in two dairy herds in Texas, two dairy herds in Kansas and one dairy her in Michigan that had recently received cows from Texas. HPAI was detected in unpasteurized samples of milk and swabs taken for diagnosis of sick cattle on the dairy farms in Texas, Kansas and Michigan. Testing is also underway for two herds in New Mexico and two additional herds in Texas. These samples were submitted as part of an investigation into illness among primarily older dairy cows that is causing decreased lactation, low appetite, and other symptoms. However, these detections are also appearing in some younger lactating cows. Testing is underway for additional dairy herds in New Mexico, Texas, and Idaho which have cows exhibiting similar signs of illness.

At this time, there continues to be no concern about the safety of the interstate commercial milk supply because products are pasteurized before entering the market, or that this circumstance poses a risk to consumer health.

Only milk from heathy animals is authorized for distribution into interstate commerce for human consumption. Additionally, pasteurization has continually proven to inactivate bacteria and viruses, like influenza, in milk. Pasteurization is required for any milk entering interstate commerce. Milk from impacted animals is being diverted or destroyed so that it does not enter the human food supply. Milk loss resulting from symptomatic cattle to date is too limited to have a major impact on supply and there should be no impact on the price of milk or other dairy products. The FDA will continue to work with our partners and provide updates as necessary.

More information about the detections, as well as information about biosecurity measures producers can take to protect their animals from HPAI is available at USDA, FDA and CDC Share Update on HPAI Detections in Dairy Cattle | USDA-APHIS.

The FDA will continue to work with our partners and provide updates as necessary.



On this page:

Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI)


What is HPAI and why is it a problem?

Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) is a highly contagious and often deadly disease of poultry, caused by the avian influenza virus also known as bird or avian flu. HPAI can be transmitted by wild birds to domestic poultry and other bird and animal species. Although bird flu viruses do not normally infect humans, sporadic human infections have occurred. It is important to note that “highly pathogenic” refers to severe impact in birds, not necessarily in humans. Milk Safety and Supply


Is the milk available in the retail market safe to drink?

The FDA does not currently have concerns about the safety and availability of pasteurized milk products nationwide. Pasteurization has continually proven to inactivate bacteria and viruses, like influenza, in milk and is required for any milk entering interstate commerce. We are continuing to monitor the situation and will provide updates on our website if necessary.

Is this situation impacting the availability of milk?

At this time, milk loss resulting from symptomatic cattle is too limited to have a major impact on supply and there should be no impact on the price of milk or other dairy products. The FDA is not aware that this incident is impacting the availability of pasteurized milk products nationwide. We will continue to monitor the supply chain impacts and will update this page as necessary.

What about cheese sold at retail?

Again, the FDA does not currently have concerns about the safety and availability of pasteurized milk products, including pasteurized cheese, sold nationwide. Pasteurization has continually proven to inactivate bacteria and viruses, like influenza, in milk and milk products such as cheese. We are continuing to monitor the situation and will provide updates on our website if necessary. Also, see questions regarding cheese made from raw/unpasteurized milk. Raw Milk/Cheese Concerns


Are there concerns about HPAI and raw, unpasteurized milk?

Based on the limited research and information available, we do not know at this time if Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) can be transmitted through consumption of unpasteurized (raw) milk and products (such as cheese) made from raw milk from infected cows. However, we have long known that raw milk can harbor dangerous microorganisms (germs) that can pose serious health risks to consumers. According to the CDC, from 1998 through 2018, there were 202 outbreaks linked to drinking raw milk, resulting in 2,645 illnesses and 228 hospitalizations. These outbreaks have typically been caused by the presence of bacteria such as Campylobacter, Cryptosporidium, E. coli, Salmonella, or Listeria monocytogenes in the raw milk. For more information about how consumers can protect themselves from these risks see our Raw Milk.

Because of the limited information available about the transmission of HPAI in raw milk, the FDA recommends that industry does not manufacture or sell raw milk or raw milk cheese products made with milk from cows showing symptoms of illness, including those infected with avian influenza or exposed to those infected with avian influenza.

Additionally, as it is prohibited to sell raw milk for human consumption in interstate commerce, each state has its own regulations regarding the sale and distribution of raw milk within the state. Therefore, we defer questions or concerns about raw milk to the state authorities in which the raw milk is sold.

What about raw, unpasteurized cheese that has undergone aging?

FDA regulations require a 60-day aging process for unpasteurized cheese to ensure food safety, as the aging process is important to inactivate bacteria and viruses. However, because we have limited research and information on whether HPAI can be transmitted through raw milk or raw milk products, such as cheese, the FDA recommends that industry does not manufacture or sell raw milk or raw/unpasteurized milk cheese products made with milk from cows showing symptoms of illness, including those infected with HPAI or exposed to those infected with avian influenza, even if the cheese will undergo the 60-day aging process.

Do consumers need to do anything different to protect against HPAI in food?

At this time, the FDA is not aware that any milk or milk products from symptomatic cows is entering interstate commerce as milk from impacted animals is being diverted or destroyed so that it does not enter the human food supply. Additionally, pasteurization has continually proven to inactivate bacteria and viruses, like influenza, in milk. Pasteurization is required for any milk entering interstate commerce. FDA’s longstanding position is that unpasteurized, raw milk can harbor dangerous microorganisms that can pose serious health risks to consumers, and FDA is reminding consumers of the risks associated with raw milk consumption in light of the HPAI detections. Safe food handling and preparation is always important and more information about best practices can be found at Safe Food Handling. Industry Involvement


Is there anything more that dairies should be doing at this time to protect the food supply?

Farms should continue to monitor their dairy cows for signs of illness to ensure that milk from sick cows does not enter into interstate commerce. Producers that identify illness in their cows should work with the State Animal Health Official's officeExternal Link Disclaimer to submit samples for diagnostic testing.

Is there anything more dairies should be doing at this time to protect their dairy cows?

It is critically important that farmers practice good biosecurity measures and contact their Area Veterinarian in Charge and/or State Animal Health OfficialExternal Link Disclaimer with concerns about preventing HPAI. Additional general information about biosecurity on dairies precautions are available at Enhanced Biosecurity Training | Secure Milk SupplyExternal Link Disclaimer. Producers should continue to closely monitor their cattle for illness, including decline in milk production, and immediately separate sick animals. Milk from these cows should be discarded. If this milk is intended to be used to feed calves, FDA strongly encourages that it be pasteurized or otherwise heat treated to kill harmful bacteria or viruses, including influenza before it is fed. Federal Government Response


Which federal agencies are involved with this response?

The USDA-APHIS is leading this response from the animal health perspective while coordinating closely with FDA concerning milk and animal feed safety, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) who is monitoring this incident from a disease control and prevention aspect. For additional information, see USDA, FDA and CDC Share Update on HPAI Detections in Dairy Cattle | USDA-APHIS.

https://www.fda.gov/food/milk-guida...ited information,or exposed to those infected
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top