• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Urban and Rural Differences in Parental Attitudes About Influenza Vaccination and Vaccine Delivery Models

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
J Rural Health. 2015 May 7. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12119. [Epub ahead of print]
[h=1]Urban and Rural Differences in Parental Attitudes About Influenza Vaccination and Vaccine Delivery Models.[/h] O'Leary ST[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2[/SUP], Barnard J[SUP]2[/SUP], Lockhart S[SUP]2[/SUP], Kolasa M[SUP]3[/SUP], Shmueli D[SUP]2[/SUP], Dickinson LM[SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]4[/SUP], Kile D[SUP]2[/SUP], Dibert E[SUP]2[/SUP], Kempe A[SUP]1,[/SUP][SUP]2,[/SUP][SUP]4[/SUP].
[h=3]Author information[/h]

[h=3]Abstract[/h] [h=4]OBJECTIVES:[/h] To assess and compare among parents of healthy children in urban and rural areas: (1) reported influenza vaccination status; (2) attitudes regarding influenza vaccination; and (3) attitudes about collaborative models for influenza vaccination delivery involving practices and public health departments.
[h=4]METHODS:[/h] A mail survey to random samples of parents from 2 urban and 2 rural private practices in Colorado from April 2012 to June 2012.
[h=4]RESULTS:[/h] The response rate was 58% (288/500). In the prior season, 63% of urban and 41% of rural parents reported their child received influenza vaccination (P < .001). No differences in attitudes about influenza infection or vaccination between urban and rural parents were found, with 75% of urban and 73% of rural parents agreeing their child should receive an influenza vaccine every year (P = .71). High proportions reported willingness to participate in a collaborative clinic in a community setting (59% urban, 70% rural, P = .05) or at their child's provider (73% urban, 73% rural, P = .99) with public health department assisting. Fewer (36% urban, 53% rural, P < .01) were likely to go to the public health department if referred by their provider. Rural parents were more willing for their child to receive vaccination outside of their provider's office (70% vs. 55%, P = .01).
[h=4]CONCLUSIONS:[/h] While attitudes regarding influenza vaccination were similar, rural children were much less likely to have received vaccination. Most parents were amenable to collaborative models of influenza vaccination delivery, but rural parents were more comfortable with influenza vaccination outside their provider's office, suggesting that other venues for influenza vaccination in rural settings should be promoted.
? 2015 National Rural Health Association.


[h=4]KEYWORDS:[/h] health services research; influenza; rural; utilization of health services; vaccine

PMID: 25951772 [PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
 
Back
Top Bottom