• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Unions - Pan/Flu Guidance

sharon sanders

Editor-in-Chief & President
"...What unions can do​

[FONT=AKDCK O+ Sabon,Sabon]Trade unions should ensure that their employer has in place either a separate policy for dealing with pandemic influenza, or a general policy covering major disasters or incidents that also covers major public health incidents such as pandemic influenza. It should not be left to employers alone to decide on what is an appropriate response. Unions must also be involved, as any effective policy must have the confidence of the whole workforce.[/FONT]​

[FONT=AKDCK O+ Sabon,Sabon]When considering your employer?s response to pandemic influenza the following are some of the areas that you may wish to address. [/FONT]
[FONT=AKDCH M+ Frutiger,Frutiger]Are the employer?s proposals reasonable and practical? [/FONT]

[FONT=AKDCK O+ Sabon,Sabon]Many employers will have either overly elaborate plans or will simply add "pandemic influenza" onto an existing emergency plan without making any real changes. To be of any use the employer must actually go through the process of considering what effect all the different possible scenarios would have on their staff and how they operate, right up to the worst likely situation of up to 50% of the workforce being off, disruption to transport, and the disruptions to other services that could also arise (such as banking, the internet, supplies etc.) ..."[/FONT]
 

Attachments

Re: Unions - Pan/Flu Guidance

This is an interesting document from many points of view.

The section quoted by F1 emphasizes the role that unions often take in our society - that of the critical voice on public or private policy. Although the paper does outline a few key areas about plandemic plans that need close scrutiny, it does not provide a critique with the same level of elaboration that it suggests employers use in creating their plans. The reader (at least me) is left wondering if there are unstated questions that should be asked when evaluating plans.

That begs the questions whether or not a gold standard pandemic plan exists, against which other pandemica plans can be evalutated?

Often we see "report card" systems used to quickly indicate the evaluation of some organization, program or policy. For example, Conference Board of Canada publishes a report card on Canad'a socio-economic performance with that of other leading industrialized countries.

http://www.conferenceboard.ca/documents.asp?rnext=2047

A similar evaluation tool is used for environmental concerns.

Does on exist for pandemic preparedness?

J.
 
Back
Top