• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

Ultrasound Int Open . Comparison of Chest Ultrasound and Standard X-Ray Imaging in COVID-19 Patients

tetano

Editor, Senior Moderator
Ultrasound Int Open


. 2020 Sep;6(2):E36-E40.
doi: 10.1055/a-1217-1603. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
Comparison of Chest Ultrasound and Standard X-Ray Imaging in COVID-19 Patients


Evgenii Shumilov[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Ali Seif Amir Hosseini[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Golo Petzold[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Hannes Treiber[SUP] 1 [/SUP], Joachim Lotz[SUP] 2 [/SUP], Volker Ellenrieder[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Steffen Kunsch[SUP] 3 [/SUP], Albrecht Neesse[SUP] 3 [/SUP]



Affiliations

Abstract

Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic poses new challenges for the medical community due to its large number of patients presenting with varying symptoms. Chest ultrasound (ChUS) may be particularly useful in the early clinical management in suspected COVID-19 patients due to its broad availability and rapid application. We aimed to investigate patterns of ChUS in COVID-19 patients and compare the findings with results from chest X-ray (CRX).
Materials and methods: 24 patients (18 symptomatic, 6 asymptomatic) with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction underwent bedside ChUS in addition to CRX following admission. Subsequently, the results of ChUS and CRX were compared.
Results: 94% (n=17/18) of patients with respiratory symptoms demonstrated lung abnormalities on ChUS. ChUS was especially useful to detect interstitial syndrome compared to CXR in COVID-19 patients (17/18 vs. 11/18; p<0.02). Of note, ChUS also detected lung consolidations very effectively (14/18 for ChUS vs. 7/18 cases for CXR; p<0.02). Besides pathological B-lines and subpleural consolidations, pleural line abnormality (89%; n=16/18) was the third most common feature in patients with respiratory manifestations of COVID-19 detected by ChUS.
Conclusion: Our findings support the high value of ChUS in the management of COVID-19 patients.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; X-ray; chest ultrasound; coronavirus.
 
Back
Top Bottom