• FluTrackers.com Inc. does not provide medical advice. Information on this web site is collected from various internet resources, and the FluTrackers board of directors makes no warranty to the safety, efficacy, correctness or completeness of the information posted on this site by any author or poster. The information collated here is for instructional and/or discussion purposes only and is NOT intended to diagnose or treat any disease, illness, or other medical condition. Every individual reader or poster should seek advice from their personal physician/healthcare practitioner before considering or using any interventions that are discussed on this website. By continuing to access this website you agree to consult your personal physican before using any interventions posted on this website, and you agree to hold harmless FluTrackers.com Inc., the board of directors, the members, and all authors and posters for any effects from use of any medication, supplement, vitamin or other substance, device, intervention, etc. mentioned in posts on this website, or other internet venues referenced in posts on this website.
  • We are not asking for any donations. Do not donate to any entity who says they are raising funds for us.

U.N. rules to contain health emergencies take hold

sharon sanders

Editor-in-Chief & President
GENEVA, June 15 (Reuters) - New rules to help the United Nations contain public health emergencies took effect on Friday, requiring countries to disclose potential threats from disease, chemical agents, radioactive materials and contaminated food.

The World Health Organisation (WHO) said its revised International Health Regulations, approved by member states in 2005, would hasten the detection, investigation and control of potentially devastating outbreaks.

The regulations build upon 1969 guidelines that required countries to report outbreaks of cholera, plague and yellow fever to the WHO. They were applied a year ago to bird flu and extended on Friday to cover other threats such as polio and smallpox. Under the broadened rules, countries need to set up round-the-clock communication with the WHO and report events that may be a public health emergency of international concern within 24 hours. Countries must also boost their ability to monitor and respond to public health threats within five years. Margaret Chan, who heads the Geneva-based agency, said the expanded regulations should lessen the chance of an influenza, or other, pandemic threat spanning the globe, as occurred in 2003 when SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) spread from China to 30 countries, killing 800 people. "SARS was a wake-up call for all of us. It spread faster than we had predicted and was only contained through intensive cooperation between countries," said Chan, who was director of health in Hong Kong at the time. "Today, the greatest threat to international public health security would be an influenza pandemic. The threat of a pandemic has not receded, but implementation of the (international health regulations) will help the world be better prepared for the possibility of a pandemic."
<table cellpading="0" border="0" cellspacing="0" height="74" width="51"><tbody><tr><td class="crumb" align="right">
</td> <td width="112">
</td></tr></tbody></table>
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/L14226681.htm
 
Re: U.N. rules to contain health emergencies take hold

As this is a subject on which I have posted many times before I am not going to go over it all again here beyond saying the IHR(2005) were a missed opportunity. Why and how I argued in my opening post in this thread http://www.flutrackers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=66555 which includes a link to the full regulations and a guide to the key clauses. At the end of that post I refer to some anecdotes by David Sencer which can be found here http://www.flutrackers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6895 . In the first of these he recounts a farcical dispute resolution under the old regulations in which he was a judge and in the second he talks about when he was the chair of the original IHR(1969) negotiations. Dr Sencer was head of the CDC at the time of the Swine flu pandemic scare, and lost his job as a result of his actions at the time, although I would argue he did the right thing with the possible exception of deploying the pre-pandemic vaccine (See post #96 in the National Pandemic Preparedness Blog thread http://www.flutrackers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=24289&page=4 ) were he the head of the CDC now I suspect we would be significantly better prepared than we are. On the subject of pre-pandemic vaccine distribution, for which Dr. Sencer was the fall guy, see Dr. Osterholm’s thoughts and my counter argument here http://www.flutrackers.com/forum/showthread.php?t=27195

Apologies for all the links.
 
Back
Top